Search

Background We calculated the population pharmacokinetics of mizoribine in adult Chinese patients and compared the parameters with those of Japanese patients to determine whether there are any ethnic differences in blood concentration transition between these 2 populations. Methods The blood concentrations of mizoribine in 21 Chinese patients who were administered mizoribine after renal transplantation were measured at 304 time points. The absorption lag time, absorption rate constant, apparent distribution volume, and oral clearance were thereafter calculated and compared with the respective Japanese references. Results The absorption lag time, absorption rate constant, and apparent distribution volume calculated in this study were, respectively, 0.353 hour, 0.856 hour−1, and 0.776 L/kg. The oral clearance was calculated as 2.18 times the creatinine clearance using creatinine clearance as a function. The absorption rate constant, apparent distribution volume, and oral clearance are determinants of the maximum blood concentration, trough, and area under the blood concentration time curve. The relative absorption rate constant, apparent distribution volume, and oral clearance were 0.9-, 0.9-, and 1.2-fold, respectively, in Chinese patients compared with those in Japanese patients. These values are within the confidence limit, suggesting that there is no significant PK difference between the 2 ethnic groups. Conclusions Results of this study showed no ethnic difference in blood mizoribine concentration transition between Chinese and Japanese patients. In addition, the population pharmacokinetic parameters obtained in this study are useful in determining the initial dosage or in the Bayesian analysis of mizoribine concentrations using scarce time points.

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of immunosuppression therapy early after kidney transplantation, particularly exposure of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), on posttransplantation de novo HLA antibody production. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, enrolling the kidney transplant or pancreas-kidney transplant recipients who had surgery between January 2010 and February 2016. Results A total of 214 recipients were included in the study with a median follow-up period of 1.06 years. A total of 30 recipients (14.0%) were positive in HLA antibody detection posttransplant with a median follow-up period of 1.46 years. Ten recipients (4.7%) lost their allograft function during follow-up, and 6 of them (60%) developed de novo HLA antibody after graft failure. Multivariate analysis showed that acute rejection significantly increased the risk of de novo HLA antibody (hazard ratio [HR], 2.732). Intensified MPA dosing therapy reduced the risk by 59.8% (HR, 0.402); low-dose CNI therapy increased the risk by 33.3% (HR, 1.333), and the effect of extremely low-dose CNI therapy was even larger (HR, 2.242). Conclusion The risk of de novo HLA antibody can be decreased by reducing the risk of acute rejection. A tendency was seen in low-dose CNI therapy to increase the risk of de novo HLA antibody, but intensified MPA dosing therapy may provide an umbrella protection effect by reducing the risk. Prospective study was required to confirm the effects.

Glomerulonephritis recurrence has emerged as one of the leading causes of allograft loss. We aimed to investigate the effect of living-related and deceased donation on the incidence of renal allograft glomerulonephritis and its effect on renal allograft survival.Adult renal allograft recipients with primary glomerulonephritis were enrolled. Transplantation date was from Feb 2004 to Dec 2015. Exclusion criteria included combined organ transplantation, structural abnormality, diabetic nephropathy, hypertension nephropathy, obstructive nephropathy, and primary uric acid nephropathy. The incidence of biopsy-proven allograft glomerulonephritis was compared between the living-related donor group and the deceased donor group. Graft survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the effect of posttransplant glomerulonephritis on graft outcome.There were 525 living-related donor kidney transplant recipients (LRKTx) and 456 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTx) enrolled. The incidence of IgA nephropathy was 8.8% in the LRKTx group and 1.3% in the DDKTx group (P .001); the incidence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was 3.8% in the LRKTx group and 1.5% in the DDKTx group (P = .03). FSGS increased the risk of graft failure compared with non-FSGS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.703 [1.459-9.397]; P = .006). IgA nephropathy increased the risk of graft failure by over 5 times 5 years after kidney transplantation compared with non-IgA nephropathy, but it did not affect early allograft survival (HR for ≥5 years, 6.139; 95% CI, 1.766-21.345; P = .004; HR for 5 years, 0.385 [0.053-2.814]; P = .35).Higher incidence of IgA nephropathy and FSGS in renal allograft was observed in living-related donor kidney transplantation compared with deceased donor kidney transplantation. De novo or recurrent IgA nephropathy and FSGS impaired long-term renal allograft survival.