1. The Clinical and Economic Benefit of CMV Matching in Kidney Transplant: A Decision Analysis
- Author
-
David A. Axelrod, Mark A. Schnitzler, Doug Norman, Ali J. Olyaei, Gregory R. Istre, Krista L. Lentine, Su-Hsin Chang, Vikas R. Dharnidharka, Joseph B. Lockridge, Darren Malinoski, and Dorry L. Segev
- Subjects
Transplantation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Kidney ,business.industry ,Analytic model ,Antiviral therapy ,virus diseases ,Cytomegalovirus ,medicine.disease_cause ,Graft loss ,Kidney transplant ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Survival advantage ,business ,Decision analysis - Abstract
Background The development of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after kidney transplant remains a significant cause of posttransplant morbidity, graft loss, and mortality. Despite appropriate antiviral therapy, recipients without previous CMV exposure can currently be allocated a kidney from a donor with previous CMV infection (D+R-) which carries the greatest risk of posttransplant CMV infection and associated complications. Preferential placement of CMV D- organs in negative recipients (R-) has been shown to reduce the risk of viral infection and associated complications. Methods To assess the long-term survival and economic benefits of allocation policy reforms, a decision analytic model was constructed to compare receipt of CMV D- with CMV D+ organ in CMV R- recipients using data from transplant registry, Medicare claims, and pharmaceutical costs. Results For CMV R- patients, receipt of a CMV D- organ was associated with greater average survival (14.3 vs 12.6 years), superior quality-adjusted life years (12.6 vs 9.8), and lower costs ($529 512 vs $542 963). One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated a survival advantage for patients waiting as long as 30 months for a CMV D- kidney. Conclusions Altering national allocation policy to preferentially offer CMV D- organs to CMV R- recipients could improve survival and lower costs after transplant if appropriately implemented.
- Published
- 2022