Search

Innovation is a hallmark of organ, tissue, and cell transplantation. The development of new treatments derived from these substances of human origin (SoHO) has rapidly evolved in recent years. Despite the great benefits that these innovative therapies could bring to patients, significant difficulties have arisen in making them equitably and widely accessible. Herein, we identify and address 4 challenges to promote innovation in this field in a collaborative, sustainable, and transparent manner and propose some concrete solutions applicable to SoHO-derived treatments, ranging from cell therapies to solid organ transplantation. Regulators, health policymakers, and government officials are recommended to incorporate specific elements into the regulatory frameworks of their respective jurisdictions, although regulatory convergence and equivalent quality and safety standards applicable to SoHO at a global level would be needed. An innovation-driven regulatory environment, respectful with the human origin and in accordance with the altruistic donation of SoHO, should be encouraged to improve the safety, effectiveness, accessibility, and affordability of SoHO and to promote collaboration between countries and between public and private sectors. This overview is the outcome of a working group focused on "Innovation in the donation and clinical application of SoHO" as part of the international Summit "Towards Global Convergence in Transplantation: Sufficiency, Transparency and Oversight" convened by the Organización Nacional de Trasplantes under the Spanish Presidency of the Council of the European Union in November 2023 and cosponsored by the Council of Europe, the World Health Organization, the Transplantation Society, and the European Society for Organ Transplantation., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ex situ machine perfusion of the donor liver, such as dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (DHOPE), is increasingly used in liver transplantation. Although DHOPE reduces ischemia/reperfusion-related complications after liver transplantation, data on cost-effectiveness are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DHOPE in donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation., Methods: We performed an economic evaluation of DHOPE versus static cold storage (SCS) based on a multicenter randomized controlled trial in DCD liver transplantation (DHOPE-DCD trial; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02584283). All patients enrolled in the 3 participating centers in the Netherlands were included. Costs related to the transplant procedure, hospital stay, readmissions, and outpatients treatments up to 1 y posttransplant were calculated. The cost for machine perfusion was calculated using 3 scenarios: (1) costs for machine perfusion, (2) machine perfusion costs plus costs for personnel, and (3) scenario 2 plus depreciation expenses for a dedicated organ perfusion room., Results: Of 119 patients, 60 received a liver after DHOPE and 59 received a liver after SCS alone. The mean total cost per patient up to 1 y posttransplant was €126 221 for the SCS group and €110 794 for the DHOPE group. The most significant reduction occurred in intensive care costs (28.4%), followed by nonsurgical interventions (24.3%). In cost scenario 1, DHOPE was cost-effective after 1 procedure. In scenarios 2 and 3, cost-effectiveness was achieved after 25 and 30 procedures per year, respectively., Conclusions: Compared with conventional SCS, machine perfusion using DHOPE is cost-effective in DCD liver transplantation, reducing the total medical costs up to 1 y posttransplant., Competing Interests: R.J.P. reports travel support and honoraria for lectures (paid to his employer) by Aferetica, XVIVO, and Johnson and Johnson. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is used for the viability assessment of high-risk donor livers before transplantation. The production of hemostatic proteins is one of the major synthetic functions of the liver. The objective of this study was to measure the concentration and functionality of hemostatic proteins concentration in the NMP perfusate of human donor livers., Methods: Thirty-six livers that underwent NMP for viability assessment were included in this study. Perfusate samples taken during NMP (start, 150 min, and 300 min) were used for the measurement of antigen and activity levels of hemostatic proteins (factors II, VII, and X; fibrinogen; plasminogen; antithrombin; tissue plasminogen activator; von Willebrand factor; and proteins induced by vitamin K absence). The antigen levels were correlated with hepatocellular function according to previously proposed individual hepatocellular viability criteria: lactate clearance and perfusate pH., Results: Antigen levels of hemostatic proteins reached subphysiological levels in the NMP perfusate. Hemostatic proteins that were produced during NMP were at least partially active. All livers produced all hemostatic proteins tested within 150 min of NMP. Hemostatic protein concentrations did not significantly correlate with perfusate lactate and perfusate pH after 150 min of NMP., Conclusions: All livers produce functional hemostatic proteins during NMP. The generation of a functional hemostatic system in NMP perfusate confirms the need for adequate anticoagulation of the perfusate to avoid generation of (micro)thrombi that may harm the graft., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is performed for hemangiosarcoma (HAS) despite disappointing results., Methods: Retrospective study of 14 males and 8 females reported to the European Liver Transplant Registry. In view of the difficult differential diagnosis between HAS and hemangioendothelioma (HE), the study was deliberately restricted to the period 1986 to 2004 to allow comparison of clinical and biochemical behavior of HAS and HE liver recipients transplanted during the same time period., Results: Clinical signs, symptoms, and biochemical parameters differed significantly. Pre-LT diagnosis of HAS was made in only 5 of 16 (31%) biopsied patients. HE (7 patients) and hepatocellular cancer (2 patients) were confounding diagnoses leading to LT. Extrahepatic disease was present at time of LT in 4 (19%) patients. Giant invalidating tumor (5 HAS, 1 with Budd-Chiari syndrome [BCS], and 10 supposed epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, 1 with BCS), acute BCS of unknown origin (2 patients), chronic liver failure (4 patients), and solitary hepatocellular cancer (1 patient) were the main indications for LT. Overall survival was 7.2±2.6 months; no patient survived after 23 months. Recurrence was diagnosed after 5.0±2.6 months. Seventeen (77.2%) patients died of tumor recurrence, and the remaining 5 patients died of early infections., Conclusions: HAS is an absolute contraindication to LT due to the poor outcome. When dealing with the difficult differential diagnosis between HAS and HE, futile LT can be avoided by taking into consideration their distinct clinical and biochemical behaviors as well as a 6-month wait-list observation period. This time period enables the evaluation of HAS disease progression without compromising prognosis of HE patients, thereby allowing to avoid organ wastage.