Search

Background. The incidence of donor kidneys with vascular anomalies ranges from 18% to 30%; such kidneys are usually at increased risk of vascular and urological complications. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of cadaver kidneys with vascular anomalies would adversely affect posttransplant graft and patient outcome.Methods. From October 1987 to January 2004, 241 patients underwent kidney transplantation in our pediatric surgery department. Vascular anomalies were noted in 77/241 grafts (31.9%); 50 (64.9%) had multiple renal arteries and 22 (28.5%) venous anomalies. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A (1 renal artery and vein, 1 arterial and venous anastomosis [n = 161]), Group B (> 1 renal artery or vein, 1 arterial and venous anastomosis [n=33]), and Group C (> 1 renal artery or vein, > 1 arterial and venous anastomosis [n=47]). We compared the three groups for: patient and graft survival, incidence of posuransplant acute tubular necrosis, vascular and urological complications, postoperative mean creatinine levels, and posuransplantation hypertension.Results. We found no significant differences among the three groups regarding episodes of acute rejection or acute tubular necrosis. Creatinine levels reached normal levels within 30 days in all the groups without any significant differences. Furthermore, patient and graft survival were excellent (100% and 97%).Conclusions. The presence of vascular anomalies and their multiple or complex repair does not represent a theoretical disadvantage even in pediatric patients. In order to maximize the quantity and quality of donor kidneys especially in pediatric population, kidneys with vascular anomalies may be implanted with very little risk.

Background. We report on a single-institutional experience with renal transplantation in patients with severe lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) who underwent bladder augmentation or urinary diversion, and assess the long-term results. Methods. From September 1987 to January 2005, 255 patients (161 male and 94 female), 7 months to 39 years old of age (median age at time of transplantation 14 years), received 271 kidney transplants. Etiology of end-stage renal disease was LUTD in 83 cases. Among these patients, 24 had undergone bladder augmentation or urinary diversion. Results. We identified two groups of patients surgically treated due to LUTD: group 1 included 16 patients (eight male, eight female) aged 4 to 39 years (median 19 years) with bladder augmentation, whereas in group 2, seven patients (five male, two female) 7 months to 31 years old (median 17 years) with incontinent urinary diversion were reported. In the first group, surgical complications after kidney transplantation included one urinary fistula, one ureteral stenosis. Three patients of second group developed recurrent urinary tract infection. Cumulative graft survival rates of all patients transplanted was 69.4% after 15 years, whereas in the two investigated groups, group 1 and group 2, was 80.7% and 55.5% respectively (P=NS.). Conclusions. Drainage of transplanted kidneys into an augmented bladder or urinary diversion is an appropriate management strategy when the native bladder is unsuitable. Kidney transplantation in patients with bladder augmentation or urinary diversion for LUTD let achieve similar results to those obtained in the general population with normal lower urinary tracts.