Search

Summary Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is an accelerated form of coronary artery disease that affects long‐term outcomes in heart transplant (HTx) patients. We prospectively evaluated the feasibility of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the detection of CAV during clinical implementation at our center. All consecutive HTx patients >4 years post‐transplant were actively converted from myocardial perfusion imaging to CCTA for the annual assessment of CAV. Between February 2018 and May 2019, 129/172 (75%) HTx patients underwent a CCTA. Renal impairment (n = 21/43) was the most frequent reason for patients could not undergo CCTA. CCTA image quality was good–excellent in 118/129 (92%) patients, and the radiation dose was 2.1 (1.6–2.8) mSv. CCTA showed obstructive CAV in 19/129 (15%) patients. Thirteen (10%) patients underwent additional tests, of which 8 patients underwent coronary revascularization within 90 days of CCTA. After 1 year, 3 additional coronary angiograms were performed, resulting in one revascularization in a patient with known severe CAV who developed ventricular tachycardia. One myocardial infarction after coronary stenting and 2 non‐cardiac deaths were observed. CCTA can be successfully implemented for routine detection of CAV with good image quality and low radiation dose. CCTA allows CAV evaluation with the limited need for additional invasive testing., CCTA can be safely and successfully implemented as a noninvasive alternative for routine detection of CAV in HTx patients with good image quality and low radiation dose.

Summary Targeting interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) is a promising strategy to counteract antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR). In inflammatory states, IL‐6 antagonism was shown to modulate cytochrome P450 (CYP), but its impact on drug metabolism in ABMR treatment was not addressed so far. We report a sub‐study of a phase 2 trial of anti‐IL‐6 antibody clazakizumab in late ABMR (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03444103). Twenty kidney transplant recipients were randomized to clazakizumab versus placebo (4‐weekly doses; 12 weeks), followed by a 9‐month extension where all recipients received clazakizumab. To study CYP2C19/CYP3A4 metabolism, we administered pantoprazole (20 mg intravenously) at prespecified time points. Dose‐adjusted C0 levels (C0/D ratio) of tacrolimus (n = 13) and cyclosporin A (CyA, n = 6) were monitored at 4‐weekly intervals. IL‐6 and C‐reactive protein were not elevated at baseline, the latter was then suppressed to undetectable levels under clazakizumab. IL‐6 blockade had no clinically meaningful impact on pantoprazole pharmacokinetics (area under the curve; baseline versus week 52: 3.16 [2.21–7.84] versus 4.22 [1.99–8.18] μg/ml*h, P = 0.36) or calcineurin inhibitor C0/D ratios (tacrolimus: 1.49 [1.17–3.20] versus 1.37 [0.98–2.42] ng/ml/mg, P = 0.21; CyA: 0.69 [0.57–0.85] versus 1.08 [0.52–1.38] ng/ml/mg, P = 0.47). We conclude that IL‐6 blockade in ABMR – in absence of systemic inflammation – may have no meaningful effect on CYP metabolism., In inflammatory disease states, interleukin‐6 antagonism was shown to interfere with CYP450 metabolism. In this phase 2 pilot trial of anti‐interleukin‐6 antibody clazakizumab in late antibody‐mediated rejection ‐ in absence of systemic inflammation ‐ we found no significant effect of treatment on the pharmacokinetics of CYP substrate pantoprazole and dose‐adjusted calcineurin inhibitor levels. Abbreviations: ABMR, antibody‐mediated rejection; CYP, cytochrome P450; DSA, donor‐specific antibodies; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; EP, endpoint; IL‐6, interleukin‐6, PK, pharmacokinetics.

The number of patients returning to dialysis after graft failure increases. Surprisingly, little is known about the clinical and immunological outcomes of this cohort. We retrospectively analyzed 254 patients after kidney allograft loss between 1997 and 2017 and report clinical outcomes such as mortality, relisting, retransplantations, transplant nephrectomies, and immunization status. Of the 254 patients, 49% had died 5 years after graft loss, while 27% were relisted, 14% were on dialysis and not relisted, and only 11% were retransplanted 5 years after graft loss. In the complete observational period, 111/254 (43.7%) patients were relisted. Of these, 72.1% of patients were under 55 years of age at time of graft loss and only 13.5% of patients were >= 65 years. Age at graft loss was associated with relisting in a logistic regression analysis. In the complete observational period, 42 patients (16.5%) were retransplanted. Only 4 of those (9.5%) were >= 65 years at time of graft loss. Nephrectomy had no impact on survival, relisting, or development of dnDSA. Patients after allograft loss have a high overall mortality. Immunization contributes to long waiting times. Only a very limited number of patients are retransplanted especially when >= 65 years at time of graft loss.

Contains fulltext : 252052.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Clinical study endpoints that assess the efficacy of interventions in patients with chronic renal insufficiency can be adopted for use in kidney transplantation trials, given the pathophysiological similarities between both conditions. Kidney dysfunction is reflected in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and although a predefined (e.g., 50%) reduction in GFR was recommended as an endpoint by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2016, many other endpoints are also included in clinical trials. End-stage renal disease is strongly associated with a change in estimated (e)GFR, and eGFR trajectories or slopes are increasingly used as endpoints in clinical intervention trials in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Similar approaches could be considered for clinical trials in kidney transplantation, although several factors should be taken into account. The present Consensus Report was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the EMA in 2020. This paper provides a contemporary discussion of primary endpoints used in clinical trials involving CKD, including proteinuria and albuminuria, and evaluates the validity of these concepts as endpoints for clinical trials in kidney transplantation.

The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) submitted a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2018, to explore whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research, thereby improving long-term outcomes for allograft recipients. The request was refined collaboratively by the EMA and ESOT, with the EMA issuing a final response in December 2020. This Transplant International special issue explores the topics that were the focus of these interactions between the EMA and ESOT. Articles explore the current issues and dilemmas in kidney transplantation, primarily relating to unclear or outdated risk stratification and markers of transplantation success, although several potential improvements for outcomes assessment are also suggested. Discussions between the EMA and ESOT and recommendations are summarized, in the hope that this project will generate further discussion eventually generating a consensus on clinical trial endpoints and risk stratification, increase the quality of research in transplantation medicine, and improve long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients. ispartof: TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL vol:35 ispartof: location:Switzerland status: published

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that assess individuals' perceptions of life participation, medication adherence, disease symptoms, and therapy side effects are extremely relevant in the context of kidney transplantation. All PROs are potentially suitable as primary or secondary endpoints in interventional trials that aim to improve outcomes for transplant recipients. Using PRO measures (PROMs) in clinical trials facilitates assessment of the patient's perspective of their health, but few measures have been developed and evaluated in kidney transplant recipients; robust methodologies, which use validated instruments and established frameworks for reporting, are essential. Establishing a core PROM for life participation in kidney transplant recipients is a critically important need, which is being developed and validated by the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG)-Tx Initiative. Measures involving electronic medication packaging and smart technologies are gaining traction for monitoring adherence, and could provide more robust information than questionnaires, interviews, and scales. This article summarizes information on PROs and PROMs that was included in a Broad Scientific Advice request on clinical trial design and endpoints in kidney transplantation. This request was submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) by the European Society for Organ Transplantation in 2016. Following modifications, the EMA provided its recommendations in late 2020. ispartof: TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL vol:35 ispartof: location:Switzerland status: published

This article gives a personal, historical, account of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on transplantation services. The content is based on discussions held at two webinars in November 2020, at which kidney transplantation experts from prestigious institutions in Europe and the United States reflected on how the pandemic affected working practices. The group discussed adaptations to clinical care (i.e., ceasing, maintaining and re-starting kidney transplantations, and cytomegalovirus infection management) across the early course of the pandemic. Discussants were re-contacted in October 2021 and asked to comment on how transplantation services had evolved, given the widespread access to COVID-19 testing and the roll-out of vaccination and booster programs. By October 2021, near-normal life and service delivery was resuming, despite substantial ongoing cases of COVID-19 infection. However, transplant recipients remained at heightened risk of COVID-19 infection despite vaccination, given their limited response to mRNA vaccines and booster dosing: further risk-reduction strategies required exploration. This article provides a contemporaneous account of these different phases of the pandemic from the transplant clinician’s perspective, and provides constructive suggestions for clinical practice and research.