Search

CD4 + T cells mediate antigen-specific allograft tolerance, but die in culture without activated lymphocyte derived cytokines. Supplementation of the media with cytokine rich supernatant, from ConA activated spleen cells, preserves the capacity of tolerant cells to transfer tolerance and suppress rejection. rIL-2 or rIL-4 alone are insufficient to maintain these cells, however. We observed that activation of naïve CD4 + CD25 + FOXP3 + Treg with alloantigen and the Th2 cytokine rIL-4 induces them to express interleukin-5 specific receptor alpha (IL-5Rα) suggesting that IL-5, a Th2 cytokine that is produced later in the immune response may promote tolerance mediating Treg. This study examined if recombinant IL-5(rIL-5) promoted survival of tolerant CD4 + , especially CD4 + CD25 + T cells. CD4 + T cells, from DA rats tolerant to fully allogeneic PVG heart allografts surviving over 100 days without on-going immunosuppression, were cultured with PVG alloantigen and rIL-5. The ability of these cells to adoptively transfer tolerance to specific-donor allograft and suppress normal CD4 + T cell mediated rejection in adoptive DA hosts was examined. Tolerant CD4 + CD25 + T cells' response to rIL-5 and expression of IL-5Rα was also assessed. rIL-5 was sufficient to promote transplant tolerance mediating CD4 + T cells' survival in culture with specific-donor alloantigen. Tolerant CD4 + T cells cultured with rIL-5 retained the capacity to transfer alloantigen-specific tolerance and inhibited naïve CD4 + T cells' capacity to effect specific-donor graft rejection. rIL-5 promoted tolerant CD4 + CD25 + T cells' proliferation in vitro when stimulated with specific-donor but not third-party stimulator cells. Tolerant CD4 + CD25 + T cells expressed IL-5Rα. This study demonstrated that IL-5 promoted the survival of alloantigen-specific CD4 + CD25 + T cells that mediate transplant tolerance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Naïve CD4+CD25+T cells suppress immune responses in a non-antigen specific manner. The effects of naïve CD4+CD25+T cells in suppressing alloimmune responses as assayed in the mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) is poorly understood. Method: The alloreactivity of naïve CD4+CD25+, CD4+CD25- and unfractionated CD4+T cells from DA rats was compared in MLC with MHC incompatible stimulator cells. The response of Lewis and PVG cells to semi-allogeneic (Lewis x PVG)F1 cells and fully allogeneic stimulators were compared. Potential mechanisms of suppression were examined by blocking T cell cytokines, produced by activated CD4+CD25+T cells. Results: Proliferation of CD4+CD25-T cells was significantly greater than unfractionated CD4+T cells to both allogeneic and syngeneic stimulator cells. CD4+CD25+T cells had no response to syngeneic stimulators and very low proliferative responses to alloantigen due to the Foxp3- cells. Admixing CD4+CD25+T cells with CD4+CD25-T cells at a ratio of 1:10 reduced the proliferation to that of unfractionated CD4+T cells. At a ratio of 1:1 proliferation was nearly totally suppressed, IL-2, IL-4 and IL-5 mRNA induction was reduced but IFN-γ, IL- 10, TGF-β and inducible nitric oxide (iNOS) mRNA induction was spared. The inhibition by CD4+CD25+T cells was not due to their consumption of IL-2 nor to anti-CD25mAb that had been used to enrich the cells being releases and blocking the IL-2 receptor on CD4+CD25+T cells that had been activated by alloantigen and induced to express CD25. Blocking IFN-γ, IL-10, TGF-β, IL-5 or iNOS did not prevent CD4+CD25+T cell's inhibition of CD4+CD25-T cell proliferation. Blocking IFN-γ or iNOS enhanced CD4+CD25+T cell proliferation only in the absence of CD4+CD25-T cells. Depletion of CD4+CD25+T cells enhanced responses to syngeneic stimulator cells, but this anti-self suppression did not regulate the response to alloantigen on semi-allogeneic stimulators. Conclusions: Two independent mechanisms that control proliferation of CD4+CD25+T cells in MLC were identified that naive CD4+CD25+T cells mediated by cell to cell contact and not release of cytokines produced in the cultures, and that CD4+CD25-T cells producing IFN-β to induce iNOS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

CD4 + T cells that transfer alloantigen-specific transplant tolerance are short lived in culture unless stimulated with specific-donor alloantigen and lymphocyte derived cytokines. Here, we examined if IFN-γ maintained survival of tolerance transferring CD4 + T cells. Alloantigen-specific transplant tolerance was induced in DA rats with heterotopic adult PVG heart allografts by a short course of immunosuppression and these grafts functioned for > 100 days with no further immunosuppression. In previous studies, we found the CD4 + T cells from tolerant rats that transfer tolerance to an irradiated DA host grafted with a PVG heart, lose their tolerance transferring ability after 3 days of culture, either with or without donor alloantigen, and effect rejection of specific-donor grafts. If cultures with specific-donor alloantigen are supplemented by supernatant from ConA activated lymphocytes the tolerance transferring cells survive, suggesting these cells depend on cytokines for their survival. In this study, we found addition of rIFN-γ to MLC with specific-donor alloantigen maintained the capacity of tolerant CD4 + T cells to transfer alloantigen-specific tolerance and their ability to suppress PVG allograft rejection mediated by co-administered naïve CD4 + T cells. IFN-γ suppressed the in vitro proliferation of tolerant CD4 + T cells. Tolerant CD4 + CD25 + T cells did not proliferate in MLC to PVG stimulator cells with no cytokine added, but did when IFN-γ was present. IFN-γ did not alter proliferation of tolerant CD4 + CD25 + T cells to third-party Lewis. Tolerant CD4 + CD25 + T cells' expression of IFN-γ receptor (IFNGR) was maintained in culture when IFN-γ was present. This study suggested that IFN-γ maintained tolerance mediating alloantigen-specific CD4 + CD25 + T cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most approaches to transplant tolerance involve treatment of the recipient to prevent rejection. This study investigates donor treatment with IL-4 for its effect on subsequent rat liver allograft survival. Rat orthotopic liver transplants were performed in rejecting (PVC donor to Lewis recipient) or spontaneously tolerant (PVG to DA) strain combinations. Donors were untreated or injected intraperitoneally with IL-4 (30,000 U/day) for 5 days. Tissue infiltrates and gene expression were examined by immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR. IL-4 induced a marked leukocyte infiltrate in donor livers prior to transplant. Macrophages comprised the major population, although 13 cells, T cells and natural killer (NK) cells also increased. lL-4-induced liver macrophages had an alternatively activated phenotype with increased expression of mannose receptor but not inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS2). lL-4 also induced lDO and IFN-gamma expression by NK cells. Donor IL-4-treatment converted rejection to acceptance in the majority of Lewis recipients (median survival time >96 days) and did not prevent acceptance in DA recipients. Acceptance in Lewis recipients was associated with increased donor cell migration to recipient spleens and increased splenic lL-2. IFN-gamma and IDO expression 24 h after transplantation. Donor IL-4-treatment increased leukocytes in the donor liver including potentially immuno-suppressive populations of alternatively activated macrophages and IDO-expressing NK cells. Donor treatment led to long-term acceptance of most livers in association with early immune activation in recipient lymphoid tissues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Naïve CD4+ T cells are central to allograft rejection, but include 3-10% CD4+CD25+ T cells that induce and maintain immune tolerance. Whether increasing the ratio of CD4+CD25+ T cells can inhibit rejection and induce tolerance is not known. This study examined the effects that naïve CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- T cells have on rejection of MHC incompatible PVG cardiac allografts in whole body irradiated DA rats. The ratio of CD4+CD25+ T cells to CD4+CD25- T cells was increased to examine if this delayed rejection. CD4+CD25+ T cells alone restored near first set rejection time of 8-10 days and were significantly faster than unfractionated CD4+ T cells which nearly always took over 10 days to effect rejection. Enriched CD4+CD25+ T cells, either fresh or cultured with IL-2 and donor alloantigen, did not restore rejection. Admixing naïve CD4+CD25+ T cells with CD4+ T cells at a ratio of 1:10 prevented graft destruction by rejection. Naïve CD4+CD25+ T cells, either fresh or cultured with IL-2 and donor alloantigen, at a ratio of 1:1, prevented significant episodes of rejection and grafts survived >300 days. These grafts had large areas of normal myocardium but had some foci of CD4+, CD8+ and CD25+ cellular infiltration. This study found CD4+CD25 T cells were the principal mediators of rejection and naive CD4+CD25+ T cells partially inhibited the CD4+CD25- T cells in unfractionated CD4+ T cells. Increasing the ratio of naïve CD4+CD25+ to CD4+CD25- T cells inhibited rejection allowing grafts to survive indefinitely and may induce transplant tolerance, without a need for long-term immunosuppression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Naïve CD4+CD25+T cells suppress immune responses in a non-antigen specific manner. The effects of naïve CD4+CD25+T cells in suppressing alloimmune responses as assayed in the mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) is poorly understood., Method: The alloreactivity of naïve CD4+CD25+, CD4+CD25(-) and unfractionated CD4+T cells from DA rats was compared in MLC with MHC incompatible stimulator cells. The response of Lewis and PVG cells to semi-allogeneic (LewisxPVG)F1 cells and fully allogeneic stimulators were compared. Potential mechanisms of suppression were examined by blocking T cell cytokines, produced by activated CD4+CD25+T cells., Results: Proliferation of CD4+CD25(-)T cells was significantly greater than unfractionated CD4+T cells to both allogeneic and syngeneic stimulator cells. CD4+CD25+T cells had no response to syngeneic stimulators and very low proliferative responses to alloantigen due to the Foxp3(-) cells. Admixing CD4+CD25+T cells with CD4+CD25(-)T cells at a ratio of 1:10 reduced the proliferation to that of unfractionated CD4+ T cells. At a ratio of 1:1 proliferation was nearly totally suppressed, IL-2, IL-4 and IL-5 mRNA induction was reduced but IFN-gamma, IL-10, TGF-beta and inducible nitric oxide (iNOS) mRNA induction was spared. The inhibition by CD4+CD25+ T cells was not due to their consumption of IL-2 nor to anti-CD25mAb that had been used to enrich the cells being releases and blocking the IL-2 receptor on CD4+CD25(-)T cells that had been activated by alloantigen and induced to express CD25. Blocking IFN-gamma, IL-10, TGF-beta, IL-5 or iNOS did not prevent CD4+CD25+T cell's inhibition of CD4+CD25(-)T cell proliferation. Blocking IFN-gamma or iNOS enhanced CD4+CD25(-)T cell proliferation only in the absence of CD4+CD25+T cells. Depletion of CD4+CD25+T cells enhanced responses to syngeneic stimulator cells, but this anti-self suppression did not regulate the response to alloantigen on semi-allogeneic stimulators., Conclusions: Two independent mechanisms that control proliferation of CD4+CD25(-)T cells in MLC were identified that naive CD4+CD25+T cells mediated by cell to cell contact and not release of cytokines produced in the cultures, and that CD4+CD25(-)T cells producing IFN-gamma to induce iNOS.