Search

Background Acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN) is thought to affect graft and patient survival among renal transplant recipients. The objective was to compare outcomes among early AGPN (< 6 months from transplant) versus late AGPN (> 6 months from transplant). Methods This retrospective study analyzed 150 patients with AGPN dividing them into early and late AGPN from 2008 to 2016. Predictors of graft loss and mortality were compared using logistic regression analysis. Graft survival and patient survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meyer survival plots. Results 55.3% (n = 83) had early AGPN and 44.7% (n = 67) had late AGPN. In early AGPN group, 13.3% had CMV disease on follow up compared to 3% in late AGPN group (p < 0.05). 26.5% had history of prolonged Foley's catheterization (> 5 days), 38.6% had prolonged DJ stent in-situ (> 2 weeks) following transplant surgery in the early AGPN compared to 7.5% and 19.4% respectively in the late AGPN group (p < 0.05). Recurrent GPN was more common in the late AGPN group – (35.8% versus 18.1%). Presence of renal abscess was predictive of graft loss in Univariate analysis (HR-6.12, p < 0.004). There was decreased death censored graft survival in the early AGPN group (p-0.035) with no significant difference in patient survival among the two groups. Conclusion Occurrence of early AGPN had a significant impact on long term graft survival in renal transplant recipients with no significant effect on patient survival. This study underlines the paramount importance of the prevention of UTIs in renal transplant recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Living kidney donation is a complex psychological experience for donors. The present study examined the psychosocial impact of kidney donation on donors. Methods: The retrospective study included 506 donors who donated a kidney between 2010 and 2018 at a transplant centre in India. These donors responded via a donor insight questionnaire about their hospital anxiety, and their possible level of depression. The information included socio-demographic form with multiple information. The health survey was used periodically evaluate the psychosocial impact among donors following donation, including the transplant outcomes. Results: The majority of donors were females (79.4%). There was a significant improvement in the quality of life among donors (SF-36) following the donation of a kidney, especially among those donors who maintained good graft functions themselves as well as those who were informed about good kidney function in transplanted recipients. These donors showed a lesser degree of depressive and anxiety scores (HAD score 3.5 and BDI II 4.8) than donors who had problems themselves and/or whose donated kidneys did not function well. Most living donors (89.1%) felt that the act of donation had a positive impact on their lives and those donors would encourage others to donate a kidney. Overall, the graft outcomes impacted the donor's state of mind. Conclusion: The study showed a very positive impact of the acknowledgment of the donor by the recipient, especially those donors whose kidney transplants were well functioning. The state of depression, anxiety, and psycho-social outcomes correlated with the graft outcomes. Donors showed positive insight towards donation, with inner conscience still conclusively willing to donate and encourage others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]