Search

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for most cases. While radiotherapy has historically served as a palliative modality in metastatic NSCLC, considerable advances in its technology and the continuous development of cutting-edge therapeutic agents, such as targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are increasing its role in the multi-disciplinary management of the disease.Methods: International radiotherapy experts were convened to consider and reach consensuses on the clinical utilities of radiotherapy in metastatic NSCLC, with the aim to provide patient-focused, up to date, evidence-based, recommendations to assist cancer specialists in the management of patients with metastatic NSCLC worldwide.Results: Timely radiotherapy can offer rapid symptom alleviation and allow subsequent aggressive treatment approaches in patients with heavy tumor burden and/or oncologic emergencies. In addition, appropriate incorporation of radiotherapy as concurrent, consolidation, or salvage therapy makes it possible to achieve long-term survival, or even cure, for patients with oligo-metastatic disease. Cranial radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of brain metastasis, potentially augmenting the response and prolonging survival associated with targeted agents and ICIs. However, key questions remain, such as the appropriate choice of radiation techniques, optimal sequence of systemic therapies and radiotherapy, and optimal patient selection for such combination strategies. Although a strong rationale for combining radiotherapy and ICIs exists, its optimal parameters in this setting remain to be established.Conclusions: In the modern era, radiotherapy serves not only as a palliative tool in metastatic NSCLC, but also plays active roles in patients with oligo-focal disease, CNS metastasis and receiving ICIs.

Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers worldwide (1). The traditional treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and interventional therapy. The survival of lung cancer patients has dramatically been prolonged in recent years with the availability of targeted therapies, antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Meanwhile, technologies for the molecular detection of lung cancer have also advanced rapidly: the detection of single driver genes has evolved to cover combined multi-gene analysis, and whole exome sequencing (WES) has increasingly been applied in the clinical setting. In addition, life support technologies, including ventilators, artificial liver, and artificial kidney as well as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), have further matured, providing powerful forms of life support for patients with various acute and critical diseases. However, most clinical studies have only enrolled patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) scores from 0 to 1, with few patients having PS scores of 2; patients with a PS score of 3 or 4 have been typically excluded. Therefore, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, supportive care is recommended for patients with a PS score of 3 to 4 in the current guidelines. In the real-world, however, approximately 25% of lung cancer patients present with PS score of 3 or 4 (2) or attain scores between 3 and 4 during the course of treatment. Certain patients with high PS scores can benefit from individualized anti-tumor treatment plus appropriate life-support techniques. In 2017, the Lung Cancer Research Team at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College & Institute of Respiratory Diseases for the first time pioneered the concept of “advanced severe lung cancer” (3) and argued that standardized therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) plus anti-tumor therapy can improve both quality of life and prognosis in patients with lung cancer combined with COPD. The authors also found that the early detection of lung cancer driver genes and timely targeted therapy can be successful in treating patients with advanced severe lung adenocarcinoma with a PS score of 4 (4). In 2019, the concept of advanced severe lung cancer was further developed in a featured article (5) that indicated “Advanced severe lung cancer: does not refer to end-stage lung cancer but rather to stage IIIB, IIIC and IV lung cancers with a PS score of 2–4, which can result from a variety of factors related to the disease itself or anti-tumor drugs and which are highly likely to benefit from the currently available systemic anti-tumor therapies”. In recent years, with the advances in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment techniques and life support technologies, more clinical studies have enrolled patients with a PS score of 2, and some real-world studies have enrolled patients with PS scores of 3–4. Even for patients with early-stage lung cancer, studies have shown that patients with poor PS scores and co-morbidities have a reduced chance of undergoing surgery and an increased mortality rate (6); nevertheless, survival benefit may still be obtained through surgical modifications combined with individualized and multidisciplinary treatment (7). Therefore, the concept of severe lung cancer should not be limited to advanced lung cancer, but applied to all lung cancer patients. In particular, due to the increase in treatment options as well as substantially prolonged survival, the majority of patients may have a PS score between 2 and 4 for a certain period of time due to a variety of reasons. How to provide timely and reasonable treatment for these lung cancer patients has become a critically important real-world research topic. Therefore, we invited lung cancer experts at home and abroad to consider this issue, and this group has reached the following consensus.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) makes up 13% of lung malignancies. Only one-third of SCLC patients received their diagnosis at the limited stage. Treatment for symptomatic extensive-stage (ES) SCLC with persistent intrathoracic disease is still controversial. The present research aimed to analyze the impact of palliative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) as a treatment for this patient group and build a prognostic nomogram. METHODS: In this retrospective, multi-center study, we analyzed 120 patients with ES-SCLC and a World Health Organization performance status of 1–2 who were diagnosed between March 2014 and September 2019. A nomogram was formulated to predict the patients’ 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study cohort had a median age of 62 years, and males accounted for 85% of enrollees. A significant extension was observed in the median OS in the TRT group compared to the no TRT group (P

Significant recent advances have occurred in the use of radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). In fact, the past few decades have seen both therapeutic gains and setbacks in the evolution of radiotherapy for LA-NSCLC. The PACIFIC trial has heralded a new era of immunotherapy and has raised important questions for future study, such as the future directions of radiation therapy for LA-NSCLC in the era of immunotherapy. Modern radiotherapy techniques such as three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) provide opportunities for improved target conformity and reduced normal-tissue exposure. However, the low-dose radiation volume brought by IMRT and its effects on the immune system deserve particular attention when combing radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Particle radiotherapy offers dosimetric advantages and exhibits great immunoregulatory potential. With the ongoing improvement in particle radiotherapy techniques and knowledge, the combination of immunotherapy and particle radiotherapy has tremendous potential to improve treatment outcomes. Of particular importance are questions on the optimal radiation schedule in the settings of radio-immunotherapy. Strategies for the reduction of the irradiated field such as involved-field irradiation (IFI) and omission of clinical target volume (CTV) hold promise for better preservation of immune function while not compromising locoregional and distant control. In addition, different dose-fractionation regimens can have diverse effects on the immune system. Thus, prospective trials are urgently needed to establish the optimal dose fractionation regimen. Moreover, personalized radiotherapy which allows the tailoring of radiation dose to each individual's genetic background and immune state is of critical importance in maximizing the benefit of radiation to patients with LA-NSCLC.

Based on the PACIFIC study, the standard care of unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) shifted from concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) alone to CCRT followed by durvalumab consolidation in 2017. In the era of immunotherapy, two kinds of therapeutic drugs are involved in the management of LA-NSCLC: chemotherapeutics and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. However, the best choices of systematic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and treatment schedule remain controversial. The immune modulation effects of chemotherapy, as well as the potential immunosuppressive impact of pretreatment medications, should be taken into consideration. Indeed, chemotherapeutics are double-edged swords to immunotherapy, with both stimulatory and suppressive effects on the immune system. Moreover, low-dose chemotherapy is reported to enhance anti-tumor immune responses with reduced toxicities. As for glucocorticoids, there is no consensus about its exact impact on the efficacy of immunotherapy. In addition, the timing of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent related to CCRT has three modes: induction, concurrent, and consolidation therapy. Although CCRT followed by durvalumab consolidation is the standard of care, the best sequence of immunotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy is still under debate. Furthermore, the efficacy and toxicity of various PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors should be compared, especially in the background of CCRT. In this review, we will summarize the detailed knowledge about chemotherapeutics and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 axis agents, and discuss the potential implications in designing novel, effective treatment strategies for LA-NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Despite the emergence of programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs), knowledge gaps remain regarding the impact and timing of cranial radiotherapy for patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. METHODS: Data were collected from 461 consecutive patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for metastatic NSCLC at three institutions between June 2017 and September 2020. Intracranial progressive disease (PD) at the original disease sites, new sites, or both sites were classified as original-site PD (OPD), new-site PD (NPD), and original-and-new-site PD (ONPD), respectively. Patients with baseline BMs were categorized based on whether they received upfront cranial radiotherapy (uCRT) at any time point between the introduction of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and the first subsequent progression. RESULTS: Of the 461 patients enrolled, 110 (23.9%) had BMs at baseline. The presence of BMs did not show independent prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). During a median follow-up of 13.2 months, 96 patients with BMs developed PD, of whom 53 (55.2%) experienced intracranial PD. OPD, NPD, and ONPD were observed in 50.9%, 18.9%, and 30.2% of patients, respectively. Patients who received uCRT exhibited a longer median OS than those with BMs who did not receive uCRT (25.4 vs. 14.6 months, HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29–0.91, P=0.041); this survival advantage was more prominent in patients with 1–4 BMs (median OS, 25.4 vs. 17.0 months, HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.22–0.81, P=0.024), and uCRT was independently associated with OS among these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of BMs at baseline was not associated with poorer OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Intracranial progression on PD-l/PD-L1 inhibitors predominately occurred at the original BM sites. The use of uCRT may improve OS, especially in NSCLC patients with 1–4 BMs.

Radiotherapy, along with other loco-regional interventions, is conventionally utilized as a palliative approach to alleviate symptoms and mitigate oncological emergencies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thanks to the ongoing improvement of medical treatments in the last decade, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC has been considerably prolonged, making it feasible and clinically beneficial for radiotherapy to play a more active role in highly selected subpopulations. In this review, we will focus on the evolving roles of radiotherapy in advanced NSCLC. First of all, among patients who are initially unable to tolerate aggressive treatment due to severe symptoms caused by metastases and/or tumor emergencies, timely radiotherapy could significantly improve their performance status (PS) and general condition, thus giving them a chance for intensive treatment and prolonged survival. The efficacy, potential candidates, and optimal dose-fractionation regimens of radiotherapy in this clinical scenario will be discussed. Additionally, radiotherapy can play a curative role as a concurrent therapy, consolidation therapy, and salvage therapy for patients with oligo-metastatic, oligo-residual, and oligo-progressive disease, respectively. Accumulating evidence from recent clinical trials, basic research, and translational investigations regarding the potentially curative roles of radiotherapy in NSCLC patients with oligo-metastatic disease will be summarized. Moreover, with the advent of various small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment efficacy and overall survival of oncogene-addicted NSCLC with brain metastases have been significantly improved, and the clinical value and optimal timing of cranial radiotherapy have become topics of much debate. Finally, synergistic antitumor interactions between radiotherapy and immunotherapy have been repeatedly demonstrated. Thus, the immune sensitizing role of radiotherapy in advanced NSCLC is also highlighted in this review.

Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in the management of lung cancer. Development of radiation techniques is a possible way to improve the effect of RT by reducing toxicities through better sparing the surrounding normal tissues. This article will review the application of two forms of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), fixed-field IMRT and helical tomotherapy (HT) in lung cancer, including dosimetric and clinical studies. The advantages and potential disadvantages of these two techniques are also discussed.