Search

Platelet additive solutions (PASs) are becoming increasingly popular for storage of platelets, and PAS is steadily replacing plasma as the storage medium of platelets. PASs are electrolyte solutions intended for storage of platelets, and they are used to modulate the quality of the platelets by adding specific ingredients. All currently available PASs contain acetate. Acetate reduces the amount of glucose that is oxidised into lactic acid and thereby prevents the lowering of pH, which decreases platelet quality. Furthermore, the oxidation of acetate leads to the production of bicarbonate, which serves as buffer. The presence of potassium and magnesium in PAS prevents the lowering of pH and reduces the degree of spontaneous activation of the platelets during storage. In the hospital, platelets stored in PAS result in about half of the number of allergic transfusion reactions as compared with platelets in plasma. Recovery and survival after transfusion, as well as corrected count increments, are at least as good for platelets in PAS as for plasma, and recent data suggest they may even be better. Therefore, with the current generation of PASs, PAS should be preferred over the use of plasma for the storage of platelet concentrates., (© 2016 British Blood Transfusion Society.)

Background: The reported percentage of haemato-oncological patients experiencing bleeding complications is highly variable, ranging from 5 to 70%, posing a major problem for comparison of clinical platelet transfusion trials using bleeding complications as a primary endpoint. In a pilot study we assessed the impact of the design of scoring of bleeding on the percentage of patients with WHO grade 2 or higher bleeding grades., Study Design and Methods: We performed a prospective, observational study using a rigorous bleeding observation system in thrombocytopenic patients with haemato-oncological disorders. Endpoints of the study were the percentage of patients and days with bleeding WHO grade ≥ 2 comparing designs in which skin bleeding represent a continuation of a previous bleed or a new bleed., Results: In four participating hospitals 64 patients suffering 870 evaluable thrombocytopenic days (platelet count < 80 × 10(9) L(-1)) were included. At least one episode of bleeding grade ≥ 2 occurred in 36 patients (56%). Most grade 2 bleeding complications occurred mucocutaneously. The percentage of days with bleeding of grade ≥ 2 was 16% but decreases to 8% when only newly developed skin bleeding was included., Conclusion: Rigorous daily observation results in a bleeding incidence that is comparable to recent reportings applying the same method. The results of this study show that censoring for stable skin bleeding has a profound effect on bleeding incidence per day. The clinical relevance of rigorous or clinically judged bleeding scores as an endpoint remains to be defined., (© 2012 The Authors. Transfusion Medicine © 2012 British Blood Transfusion Society.)

The use of an additive solution for substitution of plasma for storage of leukodepleted platelet concentrates can have many advantages. In this study, a comparison was made between two platelet additive solutions: one containing citrate and acetate (PAS-II), the other also supplemented with additional salts such as magnesium, and with gluconate (Composol-PS). Donor-dependent differences were avoided by applying a paired experimental design (n = 10). The platelet concentrates were prepared by pooling five buffy coats and the additive solution, and prestorage filtration was utilized to remove leucocytes to well below 1 x 106. Storage of platelet concentrates up to 9 days after blood collection revealed that platelet concentrates in Composol-PS maintained an almost constant pH of on average 6.93 from day 2 through day 7, and at 6.90 at day 9. This was in contrast to PAS-II, which showed a gradually decreasing pH from on average 6.97 at day 1 to 6.86 at day 9. In all units stored in both solutions the swirling effect was present during 9 days of storage. In conclusion, both additive solutions allow storage of platelets, derived from pooled buffy coats, for up to 9 days after collection of the whole blood, with maintenance of good quality in vitro. Composol-PS has a slightly better buffering capacity, reflected as a more constant pH throughout the storage period.

To measure pH in platelet concentrates, blood gas analysers with different calibration principles may be used. In this study, variances observed in pH measurements with two types of blood gas analysers were investigated. pH was measured in crystalloid solutions (platelet additive solution (PAS-II), phosphate-buffered solutions) and two types of platelet concentrates (containing 100% plasma, or 65% PAS-II/35% plasma) with two blood gas analysers: either using liquid and gas calibration (AVL 945), or only liquid calibration (AVL OMNI). These measurements were compared with a reference method. Especially for PAS-II, large variation in pH was observed between AVL 945, AVL OMNI and the reference method: 6.91 +/- 0.02, 7.35 +/- 0.02 and 7.188 +/- 0.010, respectively (mean +/- SD; n = 12, P < 0.0001, paired t-test). A significant difference in pH was also found for platelet concentrates in 65% PAS/35% plasma (6.88 +/- 0.09 on AVL 945 and 7.02 +/- 0.09 on AVL OMNI, n = 134, P < 0.0001). Comparison with the reference method revealed minor differences with AVL 945, whereas AVL OMNI gave a mean difference in pH of + 0.17. Platelets in 100% plasma revealed smaller differences (6.93 +/- 0.13 for AVL 945 and 6.99 +/- 0.13 for AVL OMNI, n = 95, P < 0.0001). We conclude that different blood gas analysers can yield different pH values, especially in weak buffered solutions such as platelet concentrates in PAS-II. Validation of blood gas analysers for pH measurement of these solutions is therefore mandatory.