Search

BACKGROUND The collection of hematopoietic stem cells from the peripheral blood of healthy donors has been established as a highly efficient method. Nevertheless, some donors have a moderate or poor chance of harvest success with standard mobilization regimens. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 7216 unrelated healthy donors, who underwent granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor mobilization and consecutive leukapheresis for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We tested different donor variables of potential influence and established a statistical model for prediction of upfront mobilization capacity and harvest success. In addition, we calculated the likelihood of a successful harvest dependent on predicted preapheresis CD34+ count and recipient weight. RESULTS Female sex, older age, smoking, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, higher relative lymphocyte count, and higher large unstained cell count at baseline were negatively correlated with the CD34+ cell count on Day +5 (p

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is accepted as a routine procedure in related and unrelated healthy donors worldwide. Venous access can be accomplished by peripheral veins or a central venous catheter (CVC). STUDY DESING AND METHODS: We compared efficacy and tolerability of 40 PBSC collections via CVC with 6267 PBSC collections via peripheral veins in healthy allogeneic donors. Results of the leukapheresis procedures and side effects in the donors were evaluated. RESULTS: The median CD34+ cell counts on Day 5 and the results of the stem cell collection were not significantly different between the two groups of allogeneic donors. Pain or problems at the site of puncture or catheter insertion occurred in 58.6% of the donors with a CVC versus 37.8% of the donors with peripheral venous access (p = 0.03). The incidence and severity of paresthesia during the leukapheresis was not significantly different in both groups of donors (p = 0.09). During follow-up no major adverse events related to CVC were reported. CONCLUSION: Central femoral lines proved to be safe and tolerable in healthy allogeneic donors but peripheral venous access should be preferred, whenever possible.

The collection of hematopoietic stem cells from the peripheral blood of healthy donors has been established as a highly efficient method. Nevertheless, some donors have a moderate or poor chance of harvest success with standard mobilization regimens.We retrospectively reviewed data from 7216 unrelated healthy donors, who underwent granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor mobilization and consecutive leukapheresis for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We tested different donor variables of potential influence and established a statistical model for prediction of upfront mobilization capacity and harvest success. In addition, we calculated the likelihood of a successful harvest dependent on predicted preapheresis CD34+ count and recipient weight.Female sex, older age, smoking, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, higher relative lymphocyte count, and higher large unstained cell count at baseline were negatively correlated with the CD34+ cell count on Day +5 (p 0.0001). In contrast, higher platelet count, higher body mass index, higher absolute lymphocyte count, and higher relative monocyte count at baseline showed a positive correlation with the CD34+ count on Day +5 (p 0.0001). Using a model built on these factors, we could significantly improve the prediction of harvest success compared to a basic model.The model allows the identification of female donors who eventually have a significant risk of harvest failure if requested to donate for recipients with a high body weight.

BACKGROUND A single injection of pegfilgrastim has been shown to be equivalent to daily filgrastim in enhancing neutrophil recovery after chemotherapy, whereas the experiences with pegfilgrastim in mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Forty unselected patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma were treated with different chemotherapy regimens followed by 6 mg of pegfilgrastim for mobilization of autologous PBPCs. Patients with an inadequate mobilization (blood CD34+ cells

Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is accepted as a routine procedure in related and unrelated healthy donors worldwide. Venous access can be accomplished by peripheral veins or a central venous catheter (CVC). STUDY DESING AND METHODS: We compared efficacy and tolerability of 40 PBSC collections via CVC with 6267 PBSC collections via peripheral veins in healthy allogeneic donors. Results of the leukapheresis procedures and side effects in the donors were evaluated.The median CD34+ cell counts on Day 5 and the results of the stem cell collection were not significantly different between the two groups of allogeneic donors. Pain or problems at the site of puncture or catheter insertion occurred in 58.6% of the donors with a CVC versus 37.8% of the donors with peripheral venous access (p = 0.03). The incidence and severity of paresthesia during the leukapheresis was not significantly different in both groups of donors (p = 0.09). During follow-up no major adverse events related to CVC were reported.Central femoral lines proved to be safe and tolerable in healthy allogeneic donors but peripheral venous access should be preferred, whenever possible.