1. The diagnostic performance of rapid diagnostic tests and microscopy for malaria diagnosis in eastern Sudan using a nested polymerase chain reaction assay as a reference standard.
- Author
-
Abdalla ZA, Rahma NA, Hassan EE, Abdallah TM, Hamad HE, Omer SA, and Adam I
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Biological Assay statistics & numerical data, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnostic Tests, Routine statistics & numerical data, Early Diagnosis, Female, Humans, Malaria, Falciparum epidemiology, Male, Microscopy statistics & numerical data, Middle Aged, Plasmodium falciparum isolation & purification, Polymerase Chain Reaction statistics & numerical data, Prevalence, Reproducibility of Results, Sudan epidemiology, Young Adult, Biological Assay standards, Diagnostic Tests, Routine standards, Malaria, Falciparum diagnosis, Malaria, Falciparum genetics, Microscopy standards, Plasmodium falciparum genetics, Polymerase Chain Reaction standards
- Abstract
Background: Accurate diagnosis of malaria infection is essential for successful control and management of the disease. Both microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are recommended for malaria diagnosis, however, RDTs are more commonly used. The aim of the current study was to assess the performance of microscopy and RDTs in the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum infection using a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay as the gold standard., Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in Kassala Hospital, eastern Sudan. A total of 341 febrile participants of all ages were recruited. Blood specimens were collected and malaria testing was performed using an RDT (SD Bioline Malaria Ag Pf), microscopy and nested PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) of microscopy and the RDT were investigated., Results: The prevalence of P. falciparum malaria infections in this study was 22.9%, 24.3% and 26.7% by PCR, microscopy and RDT, respectively. Compared with microscopy, the RDT had slightly higher sensitivity (80.7% vs 74.3%; p=0.442), equivalent specificity (89.3% vs 90.4%), a similar PPV (69.2% vs 69.8%) and a higher NPV (94.0% vs 92.2%)., Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of the RDT was better than that of microscopy in the diagnosis of P. falciparum malaria when nested PCR was used as the gold standard., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF