Search

This paper considers the existence of global weak solutions for the Navier-Stokes equations in the infinite cylinder R n × R + {{\mathbf {R}}^n} \times {{\mathbf {R}}_ + } with initial data in L r {L^r} , n ≥ 3 n \geq 3 , 1 > r > ∞ 1 > r > \infty . An imbedding theorem as well as related initial value problems are also studied, thus completing results in [2].

I regret to announce that there is a serious error in my paper in these Transactions, volume 84, pp. 430-443. The error was discovered by Louis Kokoris who found that on line 8 of page 434 the expression given as 4[g(bz)](az) should have been 4[g(az)](bz). As a consequence the computation of P(z, g, az, b) yields nothing, the proof of formula (30) is not valid, and the important Lemma 9 is not proved. Thus the paper does not give a proof of its major result stated as Theorem 1. Nevertheless, the theorems of the paper are all correct and we shall provide a revision of the proof here. This revised proof has been checked by Louis Kokoris to whom the author wishes to express his great thanks. We observe first that the equation

The reading of Ayres' interesting paper suggested to me the following remarks: 1. The order of a subset of a set S in a point p4 cannot surpass the order of S in p. Hence if S2 denotes the set of all points of S of order 2, then S2 has in each point of S the order 2, the order 1, or the order 0, where the terms "order 0" and "0-dimensional" are used synonymously. SI(M), S2(1), S" may denote the set of all points of S in which S2 has the order 0, 1, 2, respectively. The points of order 2 of S are also called the ordinary points of S, and the set S2 of all ordinarv points of S may be called the ordinary part of S. The set S" of all ordinary points of the ordinary part of S may be designated the ordinary kernel of S. WVe have

The purpose of this note is to present a new proof of a generalized form of Day's fixed point theorem. The proof we give is suggested by the work of T. Mitchell in his paper, Function algebras, means, and fixed points, [2]. The version of Day's theorem which we present here has not appeared explicitly in the literature before, and seems especially well suited for application to questions concerning fixed point properties of topological semigroups. 1. Preliminaries. We adopt the terminology and notation of [2] except where otherwise specified. New terminology will be introduced as needed. Let y be a convex compactum (compact convex set in a real locally convex linear topological space E), and let A( Y) denote the Banach space of all (real) continuous affine functions on Y under the supremum norm. Observe that A(Y) contains every function of the form h=f\Y + r where fe E* and r is real; thus A(Y) separates points of Y.

1. Denote by G the group of the equation upon which depends the determi. nation of the curves of order n 3 having simple contact at 1 n ( n -3 ) points with a given curve C of order n having no double points. The case in which n is odd was discussed in the former paper (Transactions, January, 1902) and G was shown to be a subgroup of the group defined by the invariants 43, 04, , , * *, the latter group being holoedrically isomorphic with the first hypoabelian grouip on 2p indices with coefficients taken modulo 2. For n even, G is contained in the group H defined by the invariants 04' 069 * with even subscripts. JORDAN has shown (Traite, pp. 229-242) that H is holoedrically isomorphic with the abelian linear group A on 2p indices with coefficients taken modulo 2. The object of the present paper is to establish the latter theorem by a short, elementary proof, which makes no use of the abstract substitutions [al, 1 ., p, p1] of JORDAN, and which exhibits explicitly the correspondence t between the substitutions of the isomorphic groups.

The analogies that exist between infinite series and infinite integrals are well known and have frequently served to indicate the extension of a theorem or a method from one of these domains of investigation to the other. According to a principle of generalization that has been formulated by E. H. Moore, the presence of such analogies implies the existence of a general theory which incltudes the central features of both the special theories.t It is the purpose of the present paper to develop the fundamental principles of that sectioll of this general theorv which contains as particular instances the theories of Cesaro and H6lder summability of divergent series and divergent integrals. Furthermore, the usefulness of the theory will be illustrated by proving a general theorem in it which includes as special cases the Knopp-Schnee-Ford theoremt with regard to the equivalence of the Cesaro and Holder means for summing divergent series, an analogous theorem due to Landau ? concerning divergent integrals, and a further new theorem with regard to the equivalence of certain generalized derivatives. The general theorem just mentioned can be extended to the case of multiple limits so as to include other new theorems, analogous to those referred to above, with regard to multiple series, multiple integrals, and partial derivatives. This extension, however, involves formulas that are considerably more complicated than in the case of simple limits. I shall therefore reserve it for a second paper, as I wish to avoid algebraic complexity in this first presentation of the general theory. Following the terminology introduced by E. H. Moore, we indicate the basis of our general theory as follows

In the paper with the above title, which appeared in these T r a n s a c t i on s, vol. 2 (1901), p. 428, I obtained a number of general theorems concerning the zeros of functions of the form 02 y' ol y, where y is a solution of a hornogeneous linear differelntial equation of the second order. There s a further general theorem of the same character which I should have included in that paper if I had discovered it at the time, and which I now give as VII' below, it being a counterpart to VII in the earlier paper. I also give three special applications of this general result, numbered VIII', VIII", VIII"', since they are counterparts of VIII. A part of VIII' was obtained by Fite in the Annals of M athematics for June, 1917, (see the closing lines of his article) by another method; and it was this special result of Fite's that suggested to me the much more general Theorem VII'. What follows should be regarded as an addendum to the former paper, to be inserted on page 434 at the end of ? 2. All references are to that paper, to which the reader should turn for an explanation of the notation and a statement of the restrictions placed on the functions. VII'. If none of the six functions

In an earlier paper t with the same title, we have defined and studied the properties of certain subsets of a continuous curve? which we call the arc-curves of the continuous curve. In a recent paper, G. T. Whyburnil has defined the cyclic elements of a continuous curve, and he has considered a continuous curve as composed of its cyclic elements and has given a large number of the properties of connected collections of cyclic elements. On examining the two papers it is found that arc-curves and connected collections of cyclic elements have many properties in common; and, in fact, in part II of the present paper we shall show that, although these two sets were defined very differently, every connected collection of cyclic elements of a continuous curve is an arc-curve of the continuous curve, and conversely, every arc-curve that contains more than one point is a collection of cyclic elements of the continuous curve. In part III we will develop some new theory concerning the basic sets of a continuous curve, which were defined in Arc-curves, first paper, and shall show the relation between the basic sets and the nodes of a continuous curve. In part IV we shall show that an irreducible basic set of a continuous curve resembles 'in its properties the set of all end points of the continuous curve. All point sets considered in this paper are assumed to lie in a metric, separable, locally compact space. Notation. We shall use the common notation of the theory of sets, such as A +B, A-B, A B, etc., in its usual meaning. If H is a point set, the symbol H denotes the point set consisting of the points of H together

It has been brought to my attention by Mr. N. E. Steenrod that the lemma of page 708 in the paper referred to is in error. The final assertion of the proof is false. It is therefore necessary to point out that the paper is not "disturbed" by this fault. For if one requires that the Pn, «= 1,2, • • •, of the lemma be arcs then the (altered) lemma does hold, since it is true that the connected sum of a perfect continuous curve and an arc is "perfect." One verifies that this restricted lemma is sufficient for the uses of the paper.

It is the object of this paper to obtain theorems concerning the stability of the straight line solutions, and equilateral triangle solutions, respectively, in the problem of three bodies by means of the theorems and calculations of two preceding papers.t It is shown that the generalized theorems of Bohl can be applied to a neighborhood of the straight line solutions, with arbitrary masses, and to a neighborhood of the equilateral triangle solutions, if the masses are such that the characteristic exponents of the generating orbit are not all pure imaginaries. The mutual distances of the three masses are assumed constant on the generating orbit, in both cases.

This paper contains a number of disturbing misprints: Equation (2) p. 560 should read Gpf(x) = aoxPfm+ a1xPf11 + *** + amixpf + amx. Line 17 p. 561 read Ap(x) XBp(x) instead of Ap(x)Bp(x). The term perfect (volkommen) in Theorem 1 is used in the sense of Steinitz, Algebraische Theorie der Korper, edited by Hasse and Baer, pp. 50-51. Line 21 p. 562 should read Fp(x) = Qp(x) X (xP ax) + Ax. Equation (9) p. 562 should read A = aoa(Pm-l)/(P-1) + aia(P'1)/(P-1) + + am,2a0P+1 + am-,a + am. In the expression line 9 p. 563 the last term should be A(")x. Equation (17) p. 564 should read F'"(x) = Fnl(x)P -Fn-1(Wn)PFn-1(X). Line 8 from below p. 574 should read

Let A8 be the domain in the s-plane (s =o+it) defined by -gl(a) -Ah. The proofs of Theorems 1, I1, and III are the same, with the new function S(oI5.