Search

The ability of two newly developed bispyridinium oximes (K920, K923) to reduce tabun-induced acute neurotoxic signs and symptoms was compared with the oxime K203 and trimedoxime using a functional observational battery (FOB). The neuroprotective effects of the oximes studied combined with atropine on rats poisoned with tabun at a sublethal dose (130 μg/kg i.m.; 80% of LD50 value) were evaluated. Tabun-induced neurotoxicity was monitored by FOB at 2 h after tabun administration. The results indicate that all tested oximes combined with atropine enable tabun-poisoned rats to survive till the end of experiment while one non-treated tabun-poisoned rat died within 2 h. Both newly developed oximes (K920, K923) combined with atropine were able to markedly decrease tabun-induced neurotoxicity in the case of sublethal poisoning although they did not eliminate all tabun-induced acute neurotoxic signs and symptoms. Their ability to decrease tabun-induced acute neurotoxicity did not prevail the neuroprotective efficacy of trimedoxime and the oxime K203. Therefore, the newly developed oximes are not suitable for the replacement of currently available oximes (especially trimedoxime) in the treatment of acute tabun poisonings.

The influence of the combination of oximes on the reactivating and therapeutic efficacy of antidotal treatment of acute soman poisoning was evaluated. The ability of two combinations of oximes (HI-6 + trimedoxime and HI-6 + K203) to reactivate soman-inhibited acetylcholinesterase and reduce acute toxicity of soman was compared with the reactivating and therapeutic efficacy of antidotal treatment involving single oxime (HI-6, trimedoxime, K203) using in vivo model. Studies determining percent of reactivation of soman-inhibited blood and diaphragm acetylcholinesterase in poisoned rats showed that the reactivating efficacy of both combinations of oximes is slightly greater than the reactivating efficacy of the most effective individual oxime, but the difference among them is not significant. Both combinations of oximes were found to be as effective in the reduction of acute lethal toxic effects in soman-poisoned mice as the antidotal treatment involving the most efficacious individual oxime. Thus, the efficacy of oximes is comparative in rats vs mice. A comparison of reactivating and therapeutic efficacy of individual oximes showed that the newly developed oxime K203 is approximately as effective as commonly used trimedoxime; nevertheless, their reactivating and therapeutic efficacy is markedly lower compared to the oxime HI-6. Based on the obtained data, one can conclude that the antidotal treatment involving chosen combinations of oximes does not significantly influence the potency of the most effective individual oxime (HI-6) to reactivate soman-inhibited rat acetylcholinesterase and to reduce acute toxicity of soman.

The potency of bispyridinium acetylcholinesterase reactivator KR-22934 in reactivating tabun-inhibited acetylcholinesterase and reducing tabun-induced lethal toxic effects was compared with the oxime K203 and commonly used oximes. Studies determining percentage of reactivation of tabun-inhibited blood and tissue acetylcholinesterase in rats showed that the reactivating efficacy of KR-22934 was slightly higher than the reactivating efficacy of K203 and roughly corresponded to the reactivating efficacy of obidoxime and trimedoxime in blood and diaphragm. On the other hand, the oxime KR-22934 was not able to reactivate tabun-inhibited acetylcholinesterase in the brain. The therapeutic efficacy of all oximes studied approximately corresponded to their reactivating efficacy. Based on the results, one can conclude that the oxime KR-22934 is not suitable for the replacement of commonly used oximes for the antidotal treatment of tabun poisoning in spite of its potency to reactivate tabun-inhibited acetylcholinesterase in the peripheral compartment (blood, diaphragm).

The neuroprotective effects of newly-developed oxime K203 and currently available oximes (trimedoxime, obidoxime, HI-6) in combination with atropine in rats poisoned with soman were studied. The soman-induced neurotoxicity was monitored using a functional observational battery at 24 h following soman challenge. The results indicate that the potency of a newly-developed oxime K203 to counteract soman-induced neurotoxicity is very low and roughly corresponds to the neuroprotective efficacy of currently available oximes. Among tested oximes, the oxime HI-6 seems to be the most efficacious to counteract acute neurotoxicity of soman, although the differences in neuroprotective efficacy of chosen oximes are not significant. Thus, the oxime K203 does not provide any beneficial effect for the antidotal treatment of acute poisoning with soman and the oxime HI-6 should be still considered to be the best oxime for antidotal treatment of acute soman poisonings.

A potency of newly-developed oximes (K156, K203) and commonly used oximes (obidoxime, HI-6) to reactivate cyclosarin-inhibited acetylcholinesterase and to reduce cyclosarin-induced acute toxic effects was evaluated in this study. In vivo determined percentage of reactivation of cyclosarin-inhibited blood and tissue acetylcholinesterase in poisoned rats showed that the potency of a newly-developed oxime (K203) to reactivate cyclosarin-inhibited acetylcholinesterase and to reduce the acute lethal effects of cyclosarin, corresponding to the relatively low reactivating and therapeutic efficacy of obidoxime. The potency of another newly-developed oxime (K156) to counteract the inhibitory and acute clinical effects of cyclosarin is almost negligible. On the other hand, the oxime HI-6 is a very efficient reactivator of cyclosarin-inhibited acetylcholinesterase in the peripheral (blood, diaphragm) as well as central (brain) compartment, and it is able to reduce the acute toxicity of cyclosarin more than three times. Although the reactivating and therapeutic efficacy of the oxime K203 is higher compared to another newly-developed oxime K156, the reactivating and therapeutic potency of both newly-developed oximes is significantly lower in comparison with the oxime HI-6 and, therefore, none of them is suitable for replacement of HI-6 in the case of the treatment of cyclosarin poisoning.