Search

Introduction Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are new smoking devices that have gained popularity recently. However, there is limited evidence on e-cigarette consumption in Malaysia. This study aims to determine the prevalence, risk factors and perception associated with e-cigarette use among those attending government hospitals and health clinics in Malaysia. Methods A cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted in seven public hospitals and health clinics in Malaysia, which were selected through a twostage cluster sampling. A validated questionnaire was used to obtain data from the selected participants. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to determine the association between sociodemographics and perceptions of e-cigarette use. Results Almost three-quarters (73.6%; n=923/1254) of participants were aware of e-cigarettes and 13.2% (n=122/923) reported having ever used e-cigarettes. The prevalence was significantly higher among males (18.1%), smokers (21.4%), and younger age group 18–34 years (30.2%). Ever users showed favourable perceptions towards e-cigarettes compared to non-users (23.3% vs 30.14%, p

Background Worldwide, success rates for quitting smoking have been stagnant for decades despite advancement in pharmacotherapy. This study aims to test the effectiveness of a current smoking cessation treatment programme which implemented the modified UK Standard Treatment Plan based on the NHS Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training (NCSCT). Methods We conducted a double-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial with 1-month, 3-months and 6-months follow-ups among newly registered smokers seeking quit smoking services from 19 public hospitals in Malaysia. Smokers were assigned to either NCSCT behaviour modification (treatment group; n = 330) or usual care (control group; n = 172). The intervention was administered by dedicated health staff trained in the NCSCT. Data was collected through self-administered questionnaires, with validation conducted using expired air carbon monoxide measurement. Intention-to-treat analysis was adopted, with smokers who did not return for follow-ups considered smoking. Multiple logistic regression was conducted using a backward elimination model to assess the repeated measures treatment effect of quitting for each point of follow-up. Results No significant difference was discernible between the intervention and control group other than: first cigarette of the day (p=0.05), urge to smoke (p=0.020), method of quitting (p=0.018) and COppm level (p=0.0234) at baseline. Compared to the control group, individuals from the intervention group were more likely to quit successfully at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months follow-up (OR=1.698, OR=3.395, and OR=3.506 respectively). Older individuals were also more likely to abstain at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months follow-up (OR= 1.015, OR=1.022 and OR=1.032 respectively). Individuals who smoked at home were less likely to abstain at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months follow-up (OR= 0.637, OR=0.592 and OR=0.385 respectively). Conclusions The modified Standard Treatment Programme appears superior to routine care practice in maintaining follow up sessions among smokers due to its structured and organized sessions.