Search

Dabigatran and other new oral anticoagulants (OAC) represent a step forward in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). They indeed have been shown to be an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) without the burden of laboratory control. However, these new drugs compete with an effective and well-established therapy, thus bringing about a series of questions and doubts. In this report members of the board of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA) answer some questions every clinician might be confronted with.

Lupus anticoagulants belong to the family of antiphospholipid antibodies. They include two phospholipid-dependent inhibitors of coagulation that may be distinguished on the basis of specific coagulation profiles generated from the comparison of the ratios of the Kaolin Clotting Time (KCT) and the dilute Russell's Viper Venom Time (dRVVT): when the ratio of the KCT exceeds that of the dRVVT, the plasma is allocated to the "KCT" coagulation profile, when the opposite occurs, the plasma is defined to belong to the "dRVVT" coagulation profile group. We prospectively followed-up a historical cohort of 100 consecutive patients with lupus anticoagulants referred to our Institution between January 1988 and October 1997 to investigate the relationship between their coagulation profile at diagnosis and the development of thrombosis during a median follow-up time of 37.5 months (range 1-115 months). Fifty-six patients were allocated to the "dRVVT" coagulation profile, whereas the other 44 displayed the "KCT" profile. Lupus anticoagulants were transient in 17 patients, without differences between the two groups. None of these patients developed clinical events before disappearance of the phospholipid-dependent inhibitors of coagulation. The 83 cases with persistent lupus anticoagulants consistently displayed the same coagulation profile they had been allocated to at entry. Fourteen patients developed 18 thromboembolic events during the follow-up, with an overall rate of thrombosis of 4.2% patients-year. Twelve of them belonged to the "dRVVT" coagulation profile, whereas the other 2 to the "KCT" profile (p = 0.03). The "dRVVT" coagulation profile gave an odds ratio of thrombosis of 5.25 (95% confidence interval [C.I]: 1.17-23.50). Ten of the 14 patients who developed thrombosis during follow-up had already experienced thrombosis: a previous thrombotic event caused an odds ratio of recurrency of 2.72 (95% C.I.: 0.85-8.73) (p = 0.09). By multivariate analysis, the "dRVVT" coagulation profile was still associated with a trend to a higher risk of thrombosis, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Increased levels of anticardiolipin antibodies (> 40 GPL and/or MPL units) were found in all the 14 patients (p = 0.0064). The "KCT" coagulation profile was significantly associated (p = 0.005) with moderate thrombocytopenia (platelets 50-150 X 10(9)/l). Neither profile was found to represent a risk factor for the development of recurrent miscarriages, neoplastic diseases and death. In conclusion, the "dRVVT" profile appears to have predictive value with respect to the thrombotic complications suffered by patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.

The R506Q mutation ("Factor V Leiden") is responsible for the resistance to activated Protein C (aPCR), that is evaluated by coagulation tests. Such tests cannot be used in patients with lupus anticoagulants (LAs), due to the interfering effect exerted by these antibodies on "in vitro" phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests. For this reason, assays have been developed to evaluate aPCR that are insensitive to the presence of LA antibodies. We evaluated two such coagulation tests in the plasma of 82 consecutive patients with LAs. By polymerase chain reaction 3 patients (3.6%) were found heterozygous for the R506Q mutation. aPCR was evaluated by two clotting assays, proposed to be "insensitive" to the presence of LAs: 1. aPCR-tissue factor-based assay, using Factor V deficient plasma and 1:40 diluted test plasma; 2. aPCR-dRVVT-based assay with highly concentrated phospholipids. Their interassay coefficient of variation was 28% and 6.2%, respectively. Compared to the polymerase chain reaction analysis, the 2 tests displayed the following characteristics: sensitivity 67% vs 100%, specificity 92% vs 96%, positive predictive value 25% vs 50%, negative predictive value 99% vs 100%. respectively. Among LA patients without the R506Q mutation, 5 scored positive in the aPCR-tissue factor-based assay, 2 in the aPCR-dRVVT-based assay and another one in both assays. Our findings suggest that the aPCR-dRVVT-based test is more reliable and sensitive than the aPCR-tissue factor-based one to the R506Q mutation in patients with LAs. Both assays, when negative, make unlikely the presence of the R506Q mutation. Polymerase chain reaction analysis remains, however, to be performed when either test is positive.

aPL antibodies are a wide and heterogeneous family of autoantibodies, formerly believed to be directed at anionic phospholipids. In recent years they have been shown to be directed at plasma proteins bound to suitable (phospholipid) anionic surface: beta 2-GPI and prothrombin are the best known and characterized antigens, which are recognized by aCL antibodies and most Lupus Anticoagulants, respectively. The presence of these antibodies has been associated with arterial and venous thrombosis, recurrent miscarriages and thrombocytopenia in the so-called "Antiphospholipid Syndrome". Retrospective and "cross-sectional" studies have established the role of aCL antibodies and Lupus Anticoagulants as risk factors for both venous and arterial thrombosis, the most common clinical manifestations of APS. Prospective studies performed in different patients' populations have validated the association between aCL antibodies and Lupus Anticoagulants with venous and, possibly, arterial thrombosis. Along with the concept of the heterogenity of aPL antibodies there is the observation that among Lupus Anticoagulants aCL-type A, but not LA antibodies, appear to represent a risk factor for thrombosis. However, informations on the predictive value of the various laboratory tests with respect to thrombosis are still rather limited. It is, therefore, necessary to continue the development and standardization of assays that selectively identify aPL antibodies associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, in order to help the clinicians to establish the most appropriate therapeutic strategies for the prevention of the thromboembolic complication of APS.

To assess the organization and the quality of care of an anticoagulation clinic, the structure, the process of laboratory control and the clinical outcome in our Center are described. 1068 patients under control in 1994 (M/F 572/496; median age 63 range 6-91 ys., 74% in long-term prophylaxis) were evaluated. The clinic was run twice weekly by a physician, two nurses and a technician; management for emergencies was always warranted. Prothrombin time was carried out with a sensitive thromboplastin (ISI < 1.1) and a computer program provided calculation and graphical representation of INR, comparison with therapeutic range, automatic dosage prescription and print out. Laboratory quality of therapy was assessed by three different techniques: 'cumulative INR', 'last check in file' and 'linear change', yielding respectively 69% of laboratory controls, 71% of patients and 80% of days within the therapeutic range. The rate of thrombosis, major and total bleeding were respectively 0.2%, 0.2% and 12.5%. An anticoagulation clinic represents an effective organizational model for the management of patients taking oral anticoagulants.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was carried out in a single center to compare the clinical and laboratory quality of oral anticoagulant therapy monitored with recombinant tissue factor (RTF) or with a sensitive, human-derived, conventional thromboplastin (CT) in the PT test. Seven hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients receiving oral anticoagulation for various indications were randomized to RTF (n = 379) or CT (n = 368) for 6 months. Total follow-up was 167 and 153 patient-years for RTF and TP groups respectively. Fifty-six bleeding events were observed: 31 in the RTF group and 25 in the TP group. The incidence of bleeding was 18.5 and 16.5% pt-yrs for RTF and TP patients respectively (n.s.). The event-free follow-up curves were not significantly different between the two groups. The laboratory quality of oral anticoagulation was evaluated with the "last check in file" method: therapeutic INR was found in the same proportion of RTF and TP patients (70.2% vs 68.8%). Our study shows that RTF is as effective as a sensitive, conventional thromboplastin for monitoring oral anticoagulation.

An abnormal fibrinogen, denoted as "fibrinogen Bergamo I", has been characterized. Its defect consists in an exchange of arginine by cysteine in position 16 of the A alpha-chain, thus corresponding to that found in a number of other fibrinogen variants. The abnormal fibrinopeptide A cannot be split off by thrombin from intact fibrinogen Bergamo I. We describe three different chemical modifications of the cysteine A alpha 16, i.e. aminoethylation, methylation and carboxamidomethylation, and their effects on the susceptibility of fibrinogen Bergamo I towards thrombin attack. S-aminoethylation of the A alpha 16Cys renders the peptide bond A alpha 16-17 cleavable by thrombin. Following methylation or carboxamidomethylation, the A alpha 19-arginyl bond becomes accessible for thrombin. The chemically modified extended fibrinopeptide A can be readily separated from the normal fibrinopeptide A by HPLC. The latter two modifications are suitable alternative procedures for detecting the molecular defect A alpha 16Arg----Cys of fibrinogen.