1. Cost-effectiveness of outpatient versus inpatient non-invasive ventilation setup in obesity hypoventilation syndrome: the OPIP trial
- Author
-
Patrick Brian Murphy, Maxime Patout, Gill Arbane, Swapna Mandal, Georgios Kaltsakas, Michael I Polkey, Mark Elliott, Jean-François Muir, Abdel Douiri, David Parkin, Jean-Paul Janssens, Jean Louis Pépin, Antoine Cuvelier, Clare Flach, Nicholas Hart, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital [London], King‘s College London, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique (UMRS 1158), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB), Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), ADIR Association (ADIR), Office of Health Economics [London, UK] (OHE), Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Hypoxie et PhysioPathologie (HP2), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire [Grenoble] (CHU), CHU Rouen, Normandie Université (NU), and SALAS, Danielle
- Subjects
[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Inpatients ,Noninvasive Ventilation ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome ,Outpatients ,Quality of Life ,Humans ,Middle Aged ,Aged ,Non invasive ventilation - Abstract
BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend that patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) are electively admitted for inpatient initiation of home non-invasive ventilation (NIV). We hypothesised that outpatient NIV setup would be more cost-effective.MethodsPatients with stable OHS referred to six participating European centres for home NIV setup were recruited to an open-labelled clinical trial. Patients were randomised via web-based system using stratification to inpatient setup, with standard fixed level NIV and titrated during an attended overnight respiratory study or outpatient setup using an autotitrating NIV device and a set protocol, including home oximetry. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness at 3 months with daytime carbon dioxide (PaCO2) as a non-inferiority safety outcome; non-inferiority margin 0.5 kPa. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was measured using EQ-5D-5L (5 level EQ-5D tool) and costs were converted using purchasing power parities to £(GBP).ResultsBetween May 2015 and March 2018, 82 patients were randomised. Age 59±14 years, body mass index 47±10 kg/m2and PaCO26.8±0.6 kPa. Safety analysis demonstrated no difference in ∆PaCO2(difference −0.27 kPa, 95% CI −0.70 to 0.17 kPa). Efficacy analysis showed similar total per-patient costs (inpatient £2962±£580, outpatient £3169±£525; difference £188.20, 95% CI −£61.61 to £438.01) and similar improvement in HRQL (EQ-5D-5L difference −0.006, 95% CI −0.05 to 0.04). There were no differences in secondary outcomes.DiscussionThere was no difference in medium-term cost-effectiveness, with similar clinical effectiveness, between outpatient and inpatient NIV setup. The home NIV setup strategy can be led by local resource demand and patient and clinician preference.Trial registration numbersNCT02342899andISRCTN51420481.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF