Search

Background: Functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) secondary to left-sided heart disease may lead to poor quality of life and reduced long-term survival. This study evaluated clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing tricuspid valve (TV) repair using a rigid three-dimensional ring (Contour 3D, Medtronic) concomitant with another procedure., Methods: From September 2011 to July 2015, 112 patients (mean age 70.9 ± 9.0 years) were enrolled at 10 centers in Europe, Israel, and the United States. Inclusion criteria were FTR ≥ moderate and/or tricuspid annular diameter (TAD) ≥ 40 mm. Echocardiography was planned before surgery and at discharge with echocardiographic and clinical follow-ups performed 6 months postoperatively., Results: Three fourths (74.4%) of patients had higher than moderate TR. Mean TAD was 41.0 ± 7.3 mm; 61.7% of patients were in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV. The most common concomitant procedure was mitral valve repair (57 patients, 53.3%). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.9% ( n  = 1). The mean EuroSCORE II was 8.9 ± 8.4% (median: 5.9%; interquartile range: 3.5-11.5%). The observed to expected ratio (O/E) based on the median was 0.1. Six deaths occurred during follow-up (three cardiac related). Mean implanted ring size was 30.3 ± 2.7. At 6 months, 94.4% of patients showed ≤ mild TR, and 92.0% were in NYHA class I/II ( p  < 0.001 vs baseline for both). Mean pressure gradient across the TV was 2.0 ± 1.1 mm Hg; leaflet coaptation length was 7.5 ± 3.3 mm., Conclusion: The Contour 3D annuloplasty ring used for treatment of FTR substantially reduced TR for up to 6 postoperative months with low mean pressure gradients across the TV and significant improvement in NYHA class., Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01532921., Competing Interests: Ralf Guenzinger has no conflicts of interest to declare. Ruediger Lange is a consultant for Medtronic. Jean-Francois Obadia is a consultant for St. Jude Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Landanger, and Delacroix-Chevalier and receives research support from Abbott. Shuzhen Li is an employee and shareholder of Medtronic. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In contrast to an emergency department of thoracotomy (EDT), an urgent thoracotomy (UT) is defined as a surgical thoracic intervention performed in the operating room within the first 48 hours of the patient's intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The factors affecting survival after UT are not fully understood. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and outcome of patients with blunt and penetrating chest injuries who underwent UT., Methods: All adult patients who had blunt or penetrating chest trauma and who underwent UT, were included in the study. All data were collected from the patients' hospital and ICU records. Forty-five patients with thoracic injuries who underwent UT during the first 48 hours of ICU stay were analyzed. Of these, 25 had penetrating chest injuries, and 20 had blunt thoracic injuries. Of the penetrating injuries, 16 were stab wounds, and 9 were gunshot wounds., Results: Overall ICU mortality was 29% ( n  = 13) and was significantly higher in the blunt chest trauma group than in the penetrating trauma group (45% vs 16%; p  = 0.04). Lung parenchyma injuries (lacerations and contusions) were the most common intraoperative findings in both groups. The following independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were found: an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of >40; an Acute Physiology and Chronic Evaluation II (APACHE II) score of >30; prolonged duration of UT; low body temperature on admission to the ED; abnormal arterial blood lactate, bicarbonate, and pH at the end of UT; and use of vasopressors during the first 24 hours of ICU stay., Conclusion: Mortality after UT was higher in patients with blunt chest trauma. The UT should be performed in both penetrating and blunt chest trauma as quickly as possible and should be limited to damage control. It also emerges that acidosis and hypothermia in chest trauma patients need to be treated extremely aggressively before, during, and after UT., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objective: Open-heart surgery carries a high risk for hemodialysis patients. This study focuses on the short and long-term outcomes of hemodialysis patients undergoing heart surgery., Design: The study was carried out as a retrospective analysis in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery in a large university-affiliated hospital., Patients: 115 hemodialysis patients underwent cardiac surgery in our department between 1 July 1996 and 31 July 2006. 67.5 % (77 patients) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 13.2 % (15 patients) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 20.2 % (23 patients) underwent mitral valve surgery or combined valve and coronary artery bypass grafting or multiple valve surgery., Methods: The relationship between several variables (age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and previous myocardial infarction, type of disease, preoperative ejection fraction, and congestive heart failure) and operative (30 days) mortality and late survival was analyzed., Results: The overall 30-day mortality was 18.3 % (21 patients). It was 13 % (10/77 patients) for the isolated CABG group and 13.3 % (2/15) for the isolated AVR group. Patients undergoing combined valve and coronary surgery or multiple valve surgery had a higher perioperative mortality of 39.1 % (9/23) compared to the isolated CABG and isolated AVR patients. Perioperative death was also higher in patients with moderate and severe LV dysfunction, and in patients with diabetes. The duration of dialysis periods was not related to perioperative death. Mean follow-up was 26.4 +/- 29.7 months (0.1 to 104 months). Actuarial survival at 1 year and 5 years was 76 % and 55 % for isolated CABG, 59 % and 21 % for isolated AVR, and 44 % and 33 % for all other cases, respectively (log rank P = 0.001)., Conclusion: Patients on dialysis have a high risk of perioperative mortality and poor long-term survival rates. Mortality is higher and survival is worse after combined CABG and valve-related procedures or multiple valve surgery than after isolated CABG and AVR.

Background: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is an accepted treatment modality for patients with advanced emphysema. Recently, successful lung transplantation (LTX) has been reported following LVRS. We assess the pulmonary functions in lung transplant recipients after LVRS., Methods: 8 patients - 5 males and 3 women--aged 53-66 years with advanced emphysema underwent LVRS. Following clinical deterioration and decline of pulmonary function, patients underwent single LTX. Post transplantation follow-up included pulmonary function, 6 minute walk distance (6 MWD) and recording perioperative complications., Results: Median forced expiratory in one second (FEV 1) before and after LVRS were 24 % with 31 % predicted, respectively. All but one showed improvement in lung function and 6 MWD following LVRS. Median maximal 6 MWD before and after LVRS was 222 and 316 meters, respectively. Median time from LVRS to LTX was 46 months (range 10-83). All patients survived and were discharged after LTX. Median FEV1 before and after LTX was 23 % with 57 % predicted, respectively. Median 6MWD before and after LTX was 240 and 462 meters, respectively. NYHA classes improved from 3-4 to 1-2 in 7 surviving patients. At transplantation, bleeding due to pleural adhesions was observed in 4 patients; two required blood transfusions. One patient developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and one had unilateral vocal cord paralysis. At nine-month follow-up, 7 patients are doing remarkably well, while one patient died 6 months after LTX due to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS)., Conclusions: LVRS is a therapeutic option in patients with end-stage emphysema. When emphysema deteriorates, LTX can be successfully performed with significant improvement of quality of life without significant additional risk.

A relatively simple and safe method is described for the insertion of a left atrial pressure line in patients undergoing operation for repair of congenital heart defects. This method has been utilized successfully in 12 patients undergoing repair of a ventricular septal defect and tetralogy of Fallot.