1. Negligible effect of tenofovir on atazanavir trough concentrations and genotypic inhibitory quotients in the presence and absence of ritonavir
- Author
-
Niamh Higgins, Réjean Thomas, Cassandra Fournier, Nancy L. Sheehan, Denis Thibeault, Jean-Guy Baril, and Richard N. Lalonde
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Genotype ,Pyridines ,Atazanavir Sulfate ,Organophosphonates ,Gastroenterology ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Drug Interactions ,Tenofovir ,Retrospective Studies ,Pharmacology ,Ritonavir ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Adenine ,Odds ratio ,HIV Protease Inhibitors ,Middle Aged ,Viral Load ,Confidence interval ,Atazanavir ,Tolerability ,Therapeutic drug monitoring ,Female ,Drug Monitoring ,business ,human activities ,Viral load ,Oligopeptides ,medicine.drug - Abstract
BACKGROUND It is recommended to boost atazanavir with ritonavir (ATV/r) when it is combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) because of drug interactions. For tolerability, unboosted atazanavir (ATV) is sometimes coadministered with TDF. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this interaction on the proportion of patients achieving target ATV C troughs and genotypic inhibitory quotients (GIQ). MATERIALS AND METHODS A therapeutic drug monitoring database was screened to evaluate ATV concentrations. Differences in C trough and GIQ values among 4 antiretroviral drug combinations were evaluated. RESULTS Three hundred eight C troughs, 91 GIQs, and 92 viral loads were evaluated for 238, 68, and 69 patients, respectively. Patients receiving ATV/r and TDF compared with ATV and TDF were more likely to have a therapeutic C trough (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.46-3.52; P < 0.001). Among patients on unboosted ATV, the odds of having a therapeutic ATV C trough did not differ between groups with TDF versus without TDF. Although ritonavir increased the GIQ in patients receiving TDF (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% confidence interval: 1.30-8.81; P = 0.013), a similar proportion of patients on TDF and either ATV/r or ATV achieved a therapeutic GIQ. CONCLUSIONS In patients receiving TDF, ritonavir increased the ATV C trough and GIQ and patients on ATV/r were more likely to have therapeutic C troughs. However, among subjects without ritonavir boosting, TDF compared with other nucleosides did not influence the odds of achieving a therapeutic ATV C trough. These data suggest that ritonavir boosting of ATV is prudent, particularly in patients with resistance mutations.
- Published
- 2013