Search

Seaweeds are dominant organisms in coastal environments. However, in the context of global change, the integrity of these organisms is threatened by metal pollution. It is therefore important to understand how seaweeds are affected by metal concentrations in the water. Measuring the concentrations of metals in seaweed provides information about the effects of metal pollution on the seaweeds themselves and their ecosystems. Nonetheless, correct interpretation of this type of analysis requires knowledge of the cellular location of the pollutants, as the effects will differ depending on whether the metals are present in particles adhered to the surface, attached to external polysaccharides or dissolved in the cytoplasm. Thus, the objectives of this study were to compile the available information on the subcellular distribution of metals in seaweeds and to conduct a critical review of the information. We found that the existing studies provide contrasting, sometimes contradictory, results. Thus, metals have been detected entirely intracellularly and also mainly outside of the cells. In all of the studies reviewed, which used different techniques (mainly extracellular elution, X-ray microanalysis and centrifugation), methodological and/or conceptual problems were identified that raise questions about the effectiveness of each approach. To obtain reliable information about the distribution of metals in algal cells, further studies must be conducted that take into consideration the differences between elements and algal species and the limits of the methods used to measure the elements.

Although soil is known to contribute to the concentrations of elements in moss, protocols for atmospheric biomonitoring with terrestrial moss do not include recommendations on how to address this factor. As a result, researchers indiscriminately use a wide range of detection/correction methods without considering whether the results are equivalent. In this study, three of these methods were compared: i) use of the enrichment factor (EF) index; ii) calculation of the ratios of different elements in soil and moss, and subtraction of the contribution of soil concentrations from the raw concentrations of elements in mosses (SCS); and iii) positive matrix factorization (PMF), a receptor modelling method for source apportioning based on multivariate analysis techniques. The aim of the comparison was to determine whether the methods produce equivalent results and, if not, which method is the most appropriate for use in moss biomonitoring surveys. The data used corresponded to 146 samples of Pseudoscleropodium purum collected from a regular sampling grid of 15 × 15 km in Galicia (NW Spain). Comparison of the methods revealed that, although they yield relatively similar results, the corresponding interpretations are not equivalent and none of the methods provides a reliable estimate of the soil contribution to the concentrations of elements in moss samples. Independently of the technique applied, use of Ti as a reference element is not recommended, because, at least in this study, it was present at unusually high levels in moss. Given the absence of a reliable correction method and the fact that most elements are present in fairly high amounts in the soil, we recommend using atmospheric biomonitoring with moss only for Cu, Zn and Cd, i.e. for those elements in moss for which the soil contributes very low amounts and corrections are not therefore necessary The authors belong to the Galician Competitive Research Group GRC/GPC2016-002 and to the CRETUS Strategic Partnership (AGRUP2015/02) which are co-funded by FEDER (EU). Authors would like to thank RIAIDT-USC for the use of analytical facilities. P. Giráldez is grateful to the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades for a grant awarded within the Programa de Formacion de Profesorado Universitario (FPU 2018 [grant number FPU18/04134]). Z. Varela was supported by a postdoctoral research grant awarded by the Autonomous Government of Galicia (Spain) SI