Search

Previous research has identified differences in mutation frequency in genes implicated in chemotherapy resistance between mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal cancers (CRC). We hypothesized that outcomes in mucinous and non-mucinous CRC may be influenced by expression of genes responsible for chemotherapy resistance. Gene expression data from primary tumor samples were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas PanCancer Atlas. The distribution of clinical, pathological, and gene expression variables was compared between 74 mucinous and 521 non-mucinous CRCs. Predictors of overall survival (OS) were assessed in a multivariate analysis. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed to compare survival according to gene expression using the log rank test. The median expression of 5-FU-related genes TYMS, TYMP, and DYPD was significantly higher in mucinous CRC compared to non-mucinous CRC (p

Mucinous colorectal cancer is a unique histological subtype that is known to respond poorly to cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There are a number of genes known to be associated with resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. The aim of this study was to compare the somatic mutation frequency and copy number variation (CNV) in these genes between mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal cancer. A systematic search of PubMed was performed to identify papers investigating drug resistance in colorectal cancer. From this review, a list of 26 drug-resistance-associated genes was compiled. Using patient data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the somatic mutation rate and CNV was compared between patients with mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal cancer. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad PRISM® version 5.00. Data were available on 531 patients (464 non-mucinous, 67 mucinous). A statistically significant difference in the somatic mutation rate between the two cohorts was identified in the TYMP (p = 0.0179), ATP7B (p = 0.0465), SRPK1 (p = 0.0135), ABCB1 (p = 0.0423), and ABCG2 (p = 0.0102) genes. A statistically significant difference in CNV was identified between the two cohorts in the GSTP1 (p = 0.0405), CCS (p = 0.0063), and TOP1 (p = 0.0048) genes. Differences in somatic mutation rate and CNV in genes associated with resistance to 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan may partly account for the pattern of resistance observed in mucinous colorectal cancers. These genetic alterations may prove useful when deciding on a personalized approach to chemotherapy and may also represent potential therapeutic targets going forward.

Mucinous colorectal cancer is a unique histological subtype that is known to respond poorly to cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There are a number of genes known to be associated with resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. The aim of this study was to compare the somatic mutation frequency and copy number variation (CNV) in these genes between mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal cancer. A systematic search of PubMed was performed to identify papers investigating drug resistance in colorectal cancer. From this review, a list of 26 drug-resistance-associated genes was compiled. Using patient data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the somatic mutation rate and CNV was compared between patients with mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal cancer. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad PRISM® version 5.00. Data were available on 531 patients (464 non-mucinous, 67 mucinous). A statistically significant difference in the somatic mutation rate between the two cohorts was identified in the TYMP (p = 0.0179), ATP7B (p = 0.0465), SRPK1 (p = 0.0135), ABCB1 (p = 0.0423), and ABCG2 (p = 0.0102) genes. A statistically significant difference in CNV was identified between the two cohorts in the GSTP1 (p = 0.0405), CCS (p = 0.0063), and TOP1 (p = 0.0048) genes. Differences in somatic mutation rate and CNV in genes associated with resistance to 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan may partly account for the pattern of resistance observed in mucinous colorectal cancers. These genetic alterations may prove useful when deciding on a personalized approach to chemotherapy and may also represent potential therapeutic targets going forward.