Search

IntroductionIn the South African Breast Cancer and HIV Outcomes (SABCHO) study, we previously found that breast cancer patients living with HIV and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieve lower rates of complete pathologic response than patients without HIV. We now assess the impact of comorbid HIV on receipt of timely and complete neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy.Materials and MethodsSince June 2015, the SABCHO study has collected data on women diagnosed with breast cancer at 6 South African hospitals. We selected a sample of participants with stages I-III cancer who received ≥2 doses of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Data on chemotherapies prescribed and received, filgrastim receipt, and laboratory values measured during treatment were captured from patients’ medical records. We calculated the mean relative dose intensity (RDI) for all prescribed chemotherapies. We tested for association between full regimen RDI and HIV status, using linear regression to control for demographic and clinical covariates, and for association of HIV with laboratory abnormalities.ResultsThe 166 participants living with HIV and 159 without HIV did not differ in median chemotherapy RDI: 0.89 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.77-0.95) among those living with HIV and 0.87 (IQR 0.77-0.94) among women without HIV. Patients living with HIV experienced more grade 3+ anemia and leukopenia than those without HIV (anemia: 10.8% vs. 1.9%, P = .001; leukopenia: 8.4% vs. 1.9%, P = .008) and were more likely to receive filgrastim (24.7% vs. 10.7%, P = .001).ConclusionsHIV status did not impact neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy RDI, although patients with breast cancer living with HIV experienced more myelotoxicity during treatment.

Background In high-income settings, delays from breast cancer (BC) diagnosis to initial treatment worsen overall survival (OS). We examined how time to BC treatment initiation (TTI) impacts OS in South Africa (SA). Methods We evaluated women enrolled in the South African BC and HIV Outcomes study between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2019, selecting women with stages I-III BC who received surgery and chemotherapy. We constructed a linear regression model estimating the impact of sociodemographic and clinical factors on TTI and separate multivariable Cox proportional hazard models by first treatment (surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)) assessing the effect of TTI (in 30-day increments) on OS. Results Of 1260 women, 45.6% had upfront surgery, 54.4% had NAC, and 19.5% initiated treatment >90 days after BC diagnosis. Compared to the surgery group, more women in the NAC group had stage III BC (34.8% vs 81.5%). Living further away from a hospital and having hormone receptor positive (vs negative) BC was associated with longer TTI (8 additional days per 100 km, P = .003 and 8 additional days, P = .01, respectively), while Ki67 proliferation index >20 and upfront surgery (vs NAC) was associated with shorter TTI (12 and 9 days earlier; P = .0001 and.007, respectively). Treatment initiation also differed among treating hospitals (P < .0001). Additional 30-day treatment delays were associated with worse survival in the surgery group (HR 1.11 [95%CI 1.003-1.22]), but not in the NAC group. Conclusions Delays in BC treatment initiation are common in SA public hospitals and are associated with worse survival among women treated with upfront surgery.

In sub‐Saharan Africa, clinical decisions can be affected by resource constraints. This article analyzes the clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients from a previously existing cohort: women enrolled in the prospective South African Breast Cancer and HIV Outcomes study., Background. In the U.S., neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for nonmetastatic breast cancer (BC) is used with extensive disease and aggressive molecular subtypes. Little is known about the influence of demographic characteristics, clinical factors, and resource constraints on NAC use in Africa. Materials and Methods. We studied NAC use in a cohort of women with stage I–III BC enrolled in the South African Breast Cancer and HIV Outcomes study at five hospitals. We analyzed associations between NAC receipt and sociodemographic and clinical factors, and we developed Cox regression models for predictors of time to first treatment with NAC versus surgery. Results. Of 810 patients, 505 (62.3%) received NAC. Multivariate analysis found associations between NAC use and black race (odds ratio [OR] 0.49; 95% confidence limit [CI], 0.25–0.96), younger age (OR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92–0.97 for each year), T‐stage (T4 versus T1: OR 136.29; 95% CI, 41.80–444.44), N‐stage (N2 versus N0: OR 35.64; 95% CI, 16.56–76.73), and subtype (triple‐negative versus luminal A: OR 5.16; 95% CI, 1.88–14.12). Sites differed in NAC use (Site D versus Site A: OR 5.73; 95% CI, 2.72–12.08; Site B versus Site A: OR 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16–0.86) and time to first treatment: Site A, 50 days to NAC versus 30 days to primary surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% CI, 1.25–2.71); Site D, 101 days to NAC versus 126 days to primary surgery (HR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27–0.89). Conclusion. NAC use for BC at these South African hospitals was associated with both tumor characteristics and heterogenous resource constraints. Implications for Practice. Using data from a large breast cancer cohort treated in South Africa's public healthcare system, the authors looked at determinants of neoadjuvant chemotherapy use and time to initiate treatment. It was found that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increasing tumor burden and aggressive molecular subtypes, demonstrating clinically appropriate care in a lower resource setting. Results of this study also showed that time to treatment differences between chemotherapy and surgery varied by hospital, suggesting that differences in resource limitations were influencing clinical decision making. Practice guidelines and care quality metrics designed for low‐ and middle‐income countries should accommodate heterogeneity of available resources.