Search

Objectives/hypothesis Several recent studies have observed a high incidence of duodenoscope microbial contamination and an association of contamination with healthcare-acquired infections. This study sought to quantify nasopharyngoscope microbial contamination relative to that of other endoscope categories and characterize the manufacturers, outcomes, and microbial profiles associated with these cases. Study design Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Methods A total of 3,865 adverse events were collected from 2013 to 2019 using the US Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database. The fraction of total device failures associated with contamination was quantified for nasopharyngoscopes, bronchoscopes, duodenoscopes, and gastroscopes. Odds ratios of nasopharyngoscope contamination compared to that of bronchoscopes, duodenoscopes, or gastroscopes were calculated, and significance was assessed by χ2 analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for nonparametric testing of significance. Results Nasopharyngoscope device failures were reported at an incidence of 0.646 per month; 34.1% involved contamination, comparable to the frequency observed for bronchoscopes (23.4%, P = .118), duodenoscopes (29.2%, P = .493), and gastroscopes (45.3%, P = .178). The frequency of device contamination was observed to be significantly higher for a particular endoscope manufacturer regardless of endoscope category (Kruskal-Wallis P = .021). In instances of contamination, nasopharyngoscopes were significantly less associated with patient harm or death than bronchoscope (odds ratio [OR] = 10.2) and duodenoscope (OR = 4.81) cases. Conclusions Although the rates of contamination were comparable across all endoscope categories, nasopharyngoscope contamination was less commonly associated with patient harm or death. In an era of rising healthcare costs, determining adequate disinfection standards for nasopharyngoscopes and their impact on patient safety is crucial. Level of evidence NA Laryngoscope, 131:598-605, 2021.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Review the published literature of telemedicine's use within otorhinolaryngology (ORL), highlight its successful implementation, and document areas with need of future research. STUDY DESIGN: State of the Art Review. METHODS: Three independent, comprehensive searches for articles published on the subject of telemedicine in ORL were conducted of literature available from January 2000 to April 2020. Search terms were designed to identify studies which examined telemedicine use within ORL. Consensus among authors was used to include all relevant articles. RESULTS: While several, small reports document clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and the cost of telemedicine, much of the literature on telemedicine in ORL is comprised of preliminary, proof-of-concept reports. Further research will be necessary to establish its strengths and limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Particularly during the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic, telemedicine can, and should, be used within ORL practice. This review can assist in guiding providers in implementing telemedicine that has been demonstrated to be successful, and direct future research. Laryngoscope, 2020.

OBJECTIVES Adequate treatment of laryngopharyngeal malignancy often incorporates radiation therapy. Structures surrounding laryngopharynx exposed to traditional radiation doses are susceptible to posttreatment toxicity. Among poorly understood sequelae is the rare manifestation of sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) osteoradionecrosis (ORN). METHODS Three institutional encounters prompted a comprehensive literature search, generating three published case reports. Systematic extraction and analysis (n = 6) of demographics, cancer history, comorbidities, ORN presentation, imaging, and management established the largest series to investigate this pathology. RESULTS Patients were males (6), 54 to 70 years old, smokers (4), with Hypertension/dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction/coronary artery disease, second primary (2), diabetes mellitus (1), and myelofibrosis(1). Four underwent total laryngectomy, one primary, three as salvage. Five patients had concurrent chemoradiation (≥70 Gy). All patients presented with swollen, tender neck wounds concerning for persistent/recurrent malignancy. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated bone erosion (5 of 5) and increased bone scan uptake (2 of 2). All responded to surgical exploration with drainage alone (1), sequestrectomy (2), or bone resection with synovectomy (3). Complete healing took 2 months to 3 years. One unrelated patient death occurred before control of ORN was achieved. DISCUSSION Given varied patient characteristics, synergistic risk factors exist that alter bone radiation threshold, resulting in irreversible ischemic damage and osteoradionecrosis. Vascular susceptibility and inability to repair may regulate that threshold. Understanding this relationship will facilitate early detection and intervention. CONCLUSION Integrating cases of sternoclavicular joint ORN promotes awareness of atypical laryngopharyngeal radiation complications, elucidates contributing factors, educates physicians on presentation and management, and provides a platform for prospective investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 129:865-870, 2019.