Search

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate true change in leg length after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) using three-dimensional (3D) assessments, examine the factors that influence leg lengthening and verify their validity in clinical practice. Methods Study 1: a retrospective case series simulation study, included 46 patients (55 knees) that underwent knee arthroplasty or HTO. OWHTO was simulated from preoperative computed tomography using 3D preoperative planning software. Uni- and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors related to change in leg length. Study 2: a retrospective case series study, included 53 patients (55 knees) that underwent OWHTO in another institution. Change in leg length was measured preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively and was compared with the predicted change in leg length calculated using the formula obtained from Study 1. Results Study 1: the true change in leg length significantly increased and showed a strong correlation with the opening width. The change in leg length was predicted using the formula “change in leg length = opening width × 0.75–1.5.” Study 2: the predicted change in leg length showed no significant difference from the change in leg length 1 year postoperatively and a strong correlation with the measured change. Conclusions The true change in leg length after OWHTO was predicted using the formula obtained from the 3D model. Predicting the change in leg length preoperatively can be a basis to consider other HTOs.

The "grand-piano sign" is a well-known indicator of proper rotational femoral alignment. We investigated changes in the shape of the femoral anterior cutting plane by changing the rotational alignment, anterior portion depth, and cutting plane flexion angle.We simulated various cutting planes after cutting the anterior portion of the femur next to the distal femoral osteotomy in 50 patients with varus knee and also a femoral anterior osteotomy with four degree (S group) and seven degree (T group) flexion angles regarding the mechanical axis. We defined the final cutting plane as the farthest position that we could reach without making a notch and the precutting plane as two millimeters anterior from the final cutting plane. The simulated resection plane was rotated to produce external and internal rotation angles of 0°, three degrees, and five degrees relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (SEA). We investigated medial and lateral portions of the femoral anterior cutting plane length ratio (M/L).When we cut parallel to SEA, M/L was 0.67±0.09 and 0.62±0.12 in the T and S groups, respectively. M/L was approximately 0.8 and 0.5 with five degree internal and external rotations, respectively (P0.01). On comparing final cutting and precutting planes, there were no significant differences in M/L without five degree external rotation in the T group and no significant difference in any case in the S group (P0.01).The ideal M/L of the femoral anterior cutting plane was 0.62-0.67. M/L did not change with a precutting plane in almost all rotational patterns.

In TKA, we have used the "projected SEA", which is obtained by projecting the "true SEA" on the distal femoral cutting plane in clinical practice to determine the femoral component rotation. There are no reports examining the accuracy of the "projected SEA". In this study, we investigated the difference between the "true SEA" and "projected SEA".The present study was a CT-based computer-simulated case series. We evaluated 34 knees without osteoarthritis changes. These patients were selected from the operative schedule prior to THA. We defined the "true SEA" on the 3D model and the "projected SEA" on the cutting plane parallel to the distal femoral axis obtained based on the "true SEA". We changed the cutting angles from 20° flexion to 20° extension, and from five degrees varus to five degrees valgus. We measured the "true SEA angle" and "projected SEA angle" regarding the posterior condylar axis (PCA).The mean "true SEA angle" was 3.04°±1.34° (0.6-5.0°). The mean "projected SEA angle" was 3.43°±1.58° at 20° flexion, 3.42°±1.56° at 0° flexion, 3.43°±1.52° at 20° extension, 3.39°±1.59° at five degrees valgus, and 3.39°±1.50° at five degrees varus. At each cutting angle, the "projected SEA angle" was significantly larger than the "true SEA angle" (p0.001). There was no significant difference between any of the "projected SEA angles" (p0.001).We found that the true SEA and projected SEA do not differ significantly (0.39°±0.29° [range 0-1.0°]).