1. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in combat casualties: The past, present, and future
- Author
-
Scott A. Zakaluzny, Rachel M. Russo, Christina M. Theodorou, Joseph J. DuBose, and Sarah C. Stokes
- Subjects
History ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Resuscitation ,Clinical Sciences ,Nursing ,Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,History, 21st Century ,Article ,Battlefield ,medicine.artery ,medicine ,Humans ,Preventable death ,Aorta ,business.industry ,Balloon Occlusion ,History, 20th Century ,21st Century ,Emergency & Critical Care Medicine ,20th Century ,Good Health and Well Being ,Balloon occlusion ,Emergency medicine ,Hemorrhage control ,War-Related Injuries ,Surgery ,business ,Forecasting - Abstract
BACKGROUND Noncompressible torso hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion was first used in combat in the 1950s, but military use was rare before Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. During these wars, the combination of an increasing number of deployed vascular surgeons and a significant rise in deaths from hemorrhage resulted in novel adaptations of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) technology, increasing its potential application in combat. We describe the background of REBOA development in response to a need for minimally invasive intervention for hemorrhage control and provide a detailed review of all published cases (n = 47) of REBOA use for combat casualties. The current limitations of REBOA are described, including distal ischemia and reperfusion injury, as well as ongoing research efforts to adapt REBOA for prolonged use in the austere setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level V.
- Published
- 2021