Search

Background and Overview Monckeberg arteriosclerosis is a disease of unknown etiology characterized by dystrophic calcifications within the tunica media of small- and medium-sized arteries, leading to reduced arterial compliance. The authors report a case discovered incidentally on dental radiographs. Case Description A 78-year-old man with a complex medical history was seen for routine oral health care. Panoramic and bite-wing radiographs revealed a tortuous, linear calcification in the area of the left mandibular first molar anterior to the angle of the mandible and suggestive of a calcified facial artery. Conclusions and Practical Implications Medical radiologists have used the presence of arterial calcifications to determine the severity and prognosis of such diseases as primary hyperparathyroidism, secondary hyperparathyroidism, coronary artery disease, and diabetes. The presence of Monckeberg arteriosclerosis on dental radiographs can help oral health care professionals identify patients with undiagnosed systemic disease.

Background Alveolar ridge keratosis (ARK) is not widely recognized as a distinct clinicopathologic entity, and it often is included in studies of oral leukoplakia (OL), thereby implying premalignant potential. The authors' objectives were to characterize the clinicopathologic features of ARK and determine whether removing ARK from the OL category would significantly affect the prevalence of dysplasia or carcinoma in OL. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective consecutive case review of 477 ARK cases and 1,676 OL cases submitted to their biopsy service from 1995 through 2004. The authors defined ARK as a white plaque without erythema or ulceration and limited to the retromolar pad or edentulous ridge. Results Microscopically, most ARK cases (97.9 percent) exhibited hyperkeratosis without dysplasia. The few dysplastic cases (2.1 percent) were associated with one or more of the following: verrucous appearance, tobacco or alcohol use, multiple OL lesions and previous oral squamous cell carcinoma. Excluding ARK from OL increased the percentage of OL cases exhibiting dysplasia or carcinoma from 20.2 percent to 24.8 percent. Including versus excluding ARK resulted in good but less than excellent agreement in the OL case definition (κ = 0.6128). Conclusions ARK in patients without high-risk habits or other clinical warning signs appears to be a distinctly different lesion from OL, with a much smaller proportion of dysplasia or carcinoma evident among ARK versus OL cases. However, prospective studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Clinical Implications Although most cases clinically consistent with ARK are benign hyperkeratoses, dysplasia or carcinoma can be excluded only by means of biopsy and histopathologic examination.