Search

Context:Delayed, postoperative, spine infections are rare, most commonly occurring secondary to fastidious, less virulent pathogens. The etiology may involve a distant infectious focus, not related to the index operation. Patients may present months, or even years postoperatively with pain related to mechanical implant failure, often without additional signs of systemic infection.Findings:We present the case of a 59-year-old male who developed rapid disk degeneration and implant failure seven months following instrumented lumbar fusion surgery. The causal organism was found to be Micromonas micros, an anaerobic bacterium typically located in the oral cavity and associated with periodontal disease. The patient was found to have extensive oral caries, which were presumed to have occurred secondary to poor oral hygiene and his use of fentanyl lozenges for chronic back pain. The patient was treated with revision staged spinal surgery and long-term intravenous antibiotics.Conclusion/clinical relevance:This case highlights an unusual etiology of delayed postoperative spinal implant failure and provides evidence for periodontal disease as a source of hematogenous seeding in postoperative spinal infections. The orthopaedist should also be aware of the potential relationship between poor oral hygiene and the use of high sugar content fentanyl lozenges in treating chronic back pain in these patients.

Objective:To determine the prevalence and variation of inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) use in the spine trauma population and evaluate patient and facility level factors associated with their use.Study Design:Retrospective cohort.Participants/Outcome Measures:Patients with spinal injuries were identified by ICD-9 codes from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), the best validated national trauma database. Patients whose spine injuries were operatively treated and those who received IVCF were identified from procedure description fields. Additional information compiled included patient demographics, injury severity score (ISS), time until surgery, concomitant fractures, and facility level information. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship of associated factors for IVCF use.Results:Of the 120,920 patients identified with spinal injuries, 2.4% received prophylactic IVCF. Of the 13,273 patients with operatively treated spinal injuries, 8.2% received prophylactic IVCF. Of the 7,770 patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), 10.8% received prophylactic IVCF. The interquartile ranges of placement rates among centers demonstrated greater than 10 fold variation. Based on multivariate logistic regression, ISS score >12 demonstrated the strongest association with prophylactic IVCF (adjusted OR = 4.908). Concomitant pelvic and lower extremity fractures (adj OR 2.573 and 2.522) were also associated with their use.Conclusions:Currently the only data regarding existing IVCF use in the spine trauma population amounts to surveys. The present study provides the most detailed and objective information regarding their use in this setting. Even in the operatively treated and SCI subgroups, prophylactic filters were used in only a small percentage of cases but placement rates varied widely among centers. More severely injured patients (ISS >12) had highest odds of receiving prophylactic IVCF. Further study is needed to clarify their role in this vulnerable population.