Search

Recently, approval of tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors by Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency in NTRKfusion-positive cancer types has led to a variety of proposed testing algorithms. In this study, performance of the fully automated Idylla GeneFusion Assay was assessed in a set of clinically relevant cancer types, including glioblastoma, non–small-cell lung cancer, microsatellite instability–positive colorectal cancer, and thyroid carcinoma. Analysis with the Idylla GeneFusion Assay revealed significant differences in baseline RNA expression profile between the different cancer types, which corresponded to both literature and pan-TRK immunohistochemical staining. Compared with the RNA-based Oncomine Focus Assay, the Idylla GeneFusion Assay demonstrated an overall percentage agreement, positive percentage agreement, and negative percentage agreement of 92.7%, 81.8%, and 93.8%, respectively; and the pan-TRK immunohistochemistry demonstrated an overall percentage agreement, positive percentage agreement, and negative percentage agreement of 82.1%, 45.5%, and 85.7%, respectively. These findings highlighted the importance of tailoring NTRKtesting algorithms per cancer type. In a small subset, data from the RNA-based Archer FusionPlex Assay were also available. NTRKfusion detection efficiency was compared between the four NTRKtesting modalities, with a high concordance between the PCR-based methods. Last, RNA degradation was observed when using the Idylla GeneFusion Assay on snap frozen tissue samples as these are nonfixated. This might be countered by increasing the amount of sample input. To conclude, the Idylla GeneFusion Assay has shown a clear potential in identifying NTRKfusions.

In this study, the clinical performance of the Idylla MSI test (investigational use only) was evaluated in 330 colorectal carcinoma samples (all stages). This test is fully automated, from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slide to result, and gives a result in <2.5 hours. Compared with the Promega MSI Analysis System version 1.2, an overall agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of 99.7%, 98.7%, and 100%, respectively, was reached. Whereas seven samples were invalid with the Promega MSI Analysis System, only two were invalid with the Idylla MSI test. Compared with the historical immunohistochemistry (IHC) data, overall agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of 98.7%, 94.4%, and 100%, respectively, were observed. Tumor mutation burden analysis of the discordant IHC cases was in favor of the Idylla MSI test result in three of the four samples. Furthermore, for those cases where the IHC data were invalid or hard to interpret because sole loss of one DNA mismatch repair deficiency marker was observed, Idylla MSI test results were always valid and accurate. Herein, the Idylla MSI test has been shown to be an accurate, fast screening assay for the detection of microsatellite status in colorectal cancer patients, with a low number of invalid results.