Search

Giant left atrium is a rare condition, with a reported incidence of 0.3%, that is normally caused by rheumatic mitral valve disease but very rarely is caused by other etiologies. In such patients, annular dilatation with tenting and reduced height of the posterior leaflet result in significant mitral regurgitation. At surgery, the posterior leaflet was incised from the posterior mitral annulus, starting the incision at the mid portion of the mitral annulus and, if necessary, extending it to the anterolateral portion of the mitral annulus and the posteromedial portion of the mitral annulus. An autologous pericardial patch was harvested, depending on the incision. Herein is reported a surgical technique for posterior leaflet extension in patients with giant left atrium, without rheumatic disease.

Controversy exists regarding the optimal operative method or type of prosthesis for patients with a small aortic root. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the early and mid-term outcomes of standard aortic valve replacement (AVR) using 16 mm or 18 mm ATS Advanced Performance (AP) or 17 mm St. Jude Medical (SJM) Regent valves for a small aortic root.Between April 2003 and August 2009, 78 patients (age range: 50-86 years; 86% agedor = 65 years) underwent AVR with 16 mm or 18 mm ATS AP valves (16AP group: n = 21, 18AP group: n = 32), or a 17 mm SJM Regent valve (17Regent group: n = 25). Fifty-six patients (72%) had a body surface area (BSA) of1.5 m2; the BSA in the 16AP group was significantly smaller than in the other two groups. The early and mid-term outcomes, and the hemodynamic performance of the prostheses, were evaluated and compared among the groups.No operative deaths were observed in the 16AP and 17Regent groups, but one hospital death occurred in the 18AP group. During follow up, there were four cardiac-related deaths (two patients each in the 16AP and 18AP groups). Although the postoperative pressure gradient of the 16AP group was significantly higher than that of the 18AP group, the left ventricular mass in all groups was decreased significantly during follow up, but the extent of left ventricular mass regression was similar among the groups (-30%, -25% and -28% in the 16AP, 17Regent and 18AP groups, respectively; p = 0.844).The early and mid-term results of AVR with 16 mm or 18 mm ATS AP valves, or with a 17 mm SJM Regent valve, were satisfactory. Therefore, standard AVR using these small mechanical prostheses, which avoids the need to enlarge the annulus or to conduct stentless bioprosthesis implantation, might represent an acceptable method, especially in elderly patients with a small aortic root.