Search

Purpose Biomaterials used to restore digital nerve continuity after injury associated with a defect may influence ultimate outcomes. An evaluation of matched cohorts undergoing digital nerve gap reconstruction was conducted to compare processed nerve allograft (PNA) and conduits. Based on scientific evidence and historical controls, we hypothesized that outcomes of PNA would be better than for conduit reconstruction. Methods We identified matched cohorts based on patient characteristics, medical history, mechanism of injury, and time to repair for digital nerve injuries with gaps up to 25 mm. Data were stratified into 2 gap length groups: short gaps of 14 mm or less and long gaps of 15 to 25 mm. Meaningful sensory recovery was defined as a Medical Research Council scale of S3 or greater. Comparisons of meaningful recovery were made by repair method between and across the gap length groups. Results Eight institutions contributed matched data sets for 110 subjects with 162 injuries. Outcomes data were available in 113 PNA and 49 conduit repairs. Meaningful recovery was reported in 61% of the conduit group, compared with 88% in the PNA group. In the group with a 14-mm or less gap, conduit and PNA outcomes were 67% and 92% meaningful recovery, respectively. In the 15- to 25-mm gap length group, conduit and PNA outcomes were 45% and 85% meaningful recovery, respectively. There were no reported adverse events in either treatment group. Conclusions Outcomes of digital nerve reconstruction in this study using PNA were consistent and significantly better than those of conduits across all groups. As gap lengths increased, the proportion of patients in the conduit group with meaningful recovery decreased. This study supports the use of PNA for nerve gap reconstruction in digital nerve reconstructions up to 25 mm. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.

Purpose The hand has unique skin characteristics. Intrinsic flap donors are limited due to functional specificity and compactly connected structures. The hypothenar area is a reliable option for the reconstruction of finger defects. We performed anatomic studies elucidating the blood supply of this area and hypothesized that the fourth common palmar digital artery perforator free flap can be used to reconstruct soft tissue defects in fingers with minimal donor site morbidity. Methods From November 2017 to February 2020, 30 procedures of fourth common digital artery perforator free flaps were performed to cover digital skin defects . A retrospective chart review was performed, and the cases were analyzed. Results The mean patient age was 42.4 years (range, 1–75 years; median age, 40 years). Defects were located at the fingertip (n = 12), the dorsum (n = 3), the palmar (n = 9) aspect of the finger, and both the dorsal and palmar aspects of the finger (n = 6). Indications included emergent coverage (n = 13), coverage after necrosis (n = 11), oncological resection (n = 1), and contracture release (n = 5). The defect size ranged from 1.5 × 0.8 cm (1.2 cm 2) to 6 × 2.5 cm (15 cm2 ). The perforator was located approximately 1 cm proximal to the distal palmar crease as it arose from the fourth common digital artery at a right angle. It continued to the ulnar border of the hand through the superficial fascia of the hypothenar muscles before running in a proximoulnar direction toward the dorsum of the hand. The diameter of the perforator was between 0.5 and 0.7 mm. All flaps survived. One case required a split-thickness skin graft for donor site closure, and all others could be closed primarily. Conclusions The fourth common digital artery perforator is a versatile flap and can be used for both palmar and dorsal defects, including for the fingertip. The location of the perforator used differs from previous descriptions but is routinely and reliably located. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

Venous congestion after digital replantation or revascularization threatens digit survival in the immediate postoperative period. External bloodletting, including leech therapy, provides a central role in salvage of the congested finger. Although there have been previous studies describing the initiation of leech therapy for digits experiencing venous insufficiency, few published articles and no consensus guidelines have discussed the weaning of leeches in the postoperative period. We review the current evidence behind leech therapy and offer a treatment algorithm based on available data and existing leech weaning protocols.

Purpose Clinical outcomes of nerve repair have not substantially improved over the last several decades. Although clearly a multifactorial problem, basic principles including proper fascicular alignment are not always realized. The use of short conduits as connectors may enhance nerve alignment by entubulating and directing the approximation of nerve ends. Methods Ten hand surgeons (5 experienced and 5 inexperienced) performed a series of in vitro human cadaver nerve repairs. Three small-diameter (2 mm), 3 medium-diameter (3–4 mm), and 3 large-diameter (5–6 mm) nerves were repaired (under 10× magnification) utilizing each of 3 techniques: suture-only, connector-only (sutures placed through the ends of the connector), and connector-assisted (alignment sutures at the nerve interface plus connector). Three judges (blinded to who performed the repairs) assessed each repair for fascicular alignment based on predetermined qualitative scales. Results Across all surgeons, 23 of 30 connector-assisted repairs were judged good or excellent versus 18 of 30 of the suture-only and 13 of 30 of the connector-only repairs. Experienced surgeons in general did better repairs and in particular were more likely to obtain superior alignment for conduit-only repairs (73.3% vs 13.3% good or excellent) and suture-only repairs (73.3% vs 46.7% good or excellent) and were not statistically different for connector-assisted repairs (86.7% vs 66.7% good or excellent) compared with inexperienced surgeons. Conclusions In a cadaver nerve model, there was no significant difference in the technical alignment of conduit-assisted repairs between experienced and inexperienced surgeons whereas inexperienced surgeons were more likely to achieve inadequate alignment with suture-only or conduit-only repairs. Clinical relevance Connector-assisted repairs combining suture-approximation and entubulation may improve the technical alignment of nerve repairs performed, especially by less-experienced surgeons.