Search

OBJECTIVE: Unconfounded differences in inherent vulnerability to metabolic disturbance may be hypothesized for different diagnostic groups with severe mental illness. METHOD: A naturalistic cohort of patients diagnosed with DSM-IV bipolar disorder (N = 112), schizophrenia (N = 503), and schizoaffective disorder (N = 92) were assessed for metabolic disturbances. The prospective inclusions started in November 2003 and were concluded in July 2007. RESULTS: Diagnosis was strongly associated with the metabolic syndrome (chi(2) = 14.90, df = 2, p < .001). Compared with bipolar patients, the unadjusted risk for metabolic syndrome was significantly higher for schizoaffective (odds ratio [OR] = 3.51, p < .0001) but not for schizophrenia patients (OR = 1.58, p = .094). Differences were not reducible to confounding factors including treatment. Rather, the difference between bipolar and schizophrenia patients also reached significance after adjustment (OR = 1.97, p = .046). Furthermore, the association between diagnosis and glucose dysregulation was significant (chi(2) = 6.97, df = 2, p = .031), with a significantly higher risk in schizoaffective (unadjusted OR = 2.12, p = .022) but not in schizophrenia patients (unadjusted OR = 1.13, p = .640) compared with bipolar patients. Diagnostic differences in glucose dysregulation were in part mediated by body mass index (BMI). CONCLUSIONS: Schizoaffective patients in particular may be at risk for metabolic disturbances compared with bipolar and schizophrenia patients. Differences were not reducible to known metabolic risk factors and could only be explained in part by higher BMI in schizoaffective patients, suggesting an increased inherent vulnerability in this group. ispartof: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry vol:69 issue:8 pages:1319-1327 ispartof: location:United States status: published

OBJECTIVE To investigate 3-month changes in glucose metabolism in a naturalistic sample of patients with schizophrenia newly started on or switched to specific atypical antipsychotic medication therapy. METHOD One hundred eighty-three patients were evaluated before initiation and 3 months after with a 75-g glucose load oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Data were collected between November 2003 and January 2007. RESULTS Eight patients (4.4%) developed new-onset diabetes within 3 months. Initiation of clozapine resulted in a significantly higher risk for new-onset glucose abnormalities than initiation of aripiprazole (odds ratio = 67.29, 95% CI = 5.23 to 866.49). Significant drug x time interactions were found for all OGTT glucose assessments (fasting: F = 6.79, df = 5,177; p < .0001; 30 minutes: F = 3.89, df = 5,177; p = .0023; 60 minutes: F = 5.03, df = 5,177; p = .0002; 120 minutes: F = 3.78, df = 5,177; p = .0028), with the evolution of plasma glucose levels being significantly worse in patients initiated on clozapine therapy (fasting, 30 minutes, and 60 minutes), olanzapine therapy (fasting, 60 minutes, and 120 minutes), and quetiapine therapy (fasting and 60 minutes) than in patients initiated on aripiprazole therapy (p < .05). Clozapine was also significantly more deleterious than risperidone and amisulpride for fasting plasma glucose level changes (p < .05). Type of initiation (start or switch) did not affect any of the metabolic parameters. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of new-onset glucose abnormalities, including diabetes, in the first 3 months after newly starting or switching atypical antipsychotic medication is high and may be markedly influenced by type of prescribed antipsychotic. The importance of accurately screening for new-onset glucose abnormalities after initiation of an atypical antipsychotic is emphasized.