Search

BACKGROUND Two-stage exchange is a commonly used approach for treating chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). A pre-reimplantation threshold value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to determine infection eradication and the proper timing of reimplantation remains ill-defined. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 483 potential patients for eligibility. In total, 178 patients were excluded. In addition, 305 joints were eligible who underwent 2-stage revision for prosthetic hip or knee joint infection (PJI). Serum ESR and CRP were recorded at 8 weeks post resection prior to stage 2 reimplantation. ESR and CRP were analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for response failure. RESULTS In total, 252 patients had resections for chronic infections while 53 septic patients had resections for acute infections. Forty-one of 252 (16.3%) patients failed reimplantation. Median ESR at the time of reimplantation was 17 (normal less than 20 mm/h). Median CRP was 0.6 (normal less than 0.5 mg/dL). ROC plot for response failure in analyzing ESR found an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.47. ROC plot analyzing CRP found an AUC of 0.57. The ratio of ESR/CRP was also utilized and found an AUC of 0.60. All of the AUC data are in the "fail to discriminate category." CONCLUSION Although improvements in serology can be somewhat reassuring, there are no statistically significant values of ESR or CRP that would predict failure of reimplantation in the 2-stage treatment of PJI. Because we are flying blind consideration should be made for mandatory pre-reimplantation aspirates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Retrospective Case Series.

Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee carries significant morbidity, mortality, and economic cost. We hypothesize that obese and poor medical hosts will have a significant and additive increase in failure rate undergoing 2-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for PJI. Methods All 2-stage revision total knee arthroplasty procedures for PJI performed at one institution were identified between 2005 and 2020. In total, 144 patients were included and defined as success or failure based on published criteria regarding infection eradication, further intervention, or mortality. The American Society of Anesthesiologists score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index were utilized to assess host grade. Patient, surgical, and microbiologic variables were investigated with univariable and multivariable analysis to explore association with risk of failure. Results In the cohort, 32.4% of patients failed with mean follow-up of 5.1 years. In multivariable analysis, the number of major operations requiring arthrotomy and implantation of new material between the primary and first stage, host grade, and elevated body mass index were the major contributors to failure. Combining these factors, with body mass index >30 and 2 or more major operations, the failure rate increased to 76.5% and 71.4% respectively for American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3 (P ≤ .001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (P ≤ .001). Conclusion In this cohort, multiple major operations between the primary and first stage, host grade, and obesity were the major contributors to failure. When combining these factors, patients had an additive increase in failure rate. Treatments such as amputation or less invasive options and suppression should be discussed and considered in these patients.

Background The microbiological implications of septic failure after 1-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip remain unclear. Methods Information was gathered on comorbidities, previous procedures, preoperative and postoperative microbiology results, methods of detection, and antibiotic resistance patterns, for all patients, who developed septic failure after 1-stage exchange for PJI of the hip performed at our institution during 2001-2017. Results Seventy-seven patients were identified. Septic failure was diagnosed a mean of 1.7 (standard deviation 2.3, range 0-11.8) years later. Although the spectrum of microorganisms was similar to preoperative, in the majority of patients (55%), the initial microorganism(s) was (were) replaced by (a) totally different microorganism(s). Overall, there was a decrease in the number of polymicrobial PJIs. The number of patients with high virulent microorganisms decreased significantly from 52 to 36 (P = .034). The number of PJIs due to gram-negative pathogens remained similar (11 vs 14, P = .491). The number of rifampicin-resistant staphylococci, fluoroquinolone-resistant streptococci, enterococci, and fungi changed from 8 to 15, 0 to 2, 7 to 3, and 1 to 2, respectively, but these changes did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion The majority of reinfections is caused by different infecting bacteria, hence it is essential to perform a new diagnostic workup and not base treatment decisions (solely) on historical cultures. We were furthermore unable to irrefutably prove that, from a microbiological point of view, septic failure after 1-stage exchange comes with increased challenges. Given the time interval to failure, we propose that a longer follow-up of these patients is needed, than previously suggested.

Introduction Self-reported penicillin allergies in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty often results in the use of second-line prophylactic antibiotics. A higher risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with suboptimal antibiotics vs first generation cephalosporins, which have historically been grouped with other beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin for potential allergic reactions. This study evaluates the economic burden of self-reported penicillin allergies in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Methods Data from studies reporting true incidence of IgE-mediated penicillin allergies, infection-free survivorship of TJA, and cost of PJI attributed to use of second-line antibiotics were obtained. Projected cost of preoperative penicillin allergy testing and potentially avoidable PJI associated with second-line antibiotic usage were calculated. This was compared with projected cost of PJI in the current state to estimate cost savings. Results Implementation of preoperative penicillin allergy testing leads to a potential savings of nearly $37 million to payors in the first year based on 1-year survivorship. This savings increases to $411.6 million over a 10-year span and $1.18 billion over a 20-year span. Conclusion Preoperative penicillin allergy testing or risk stratification via thorough history should be implemented as standard of care for patients with self-reported penicillin allergies before TJA and would result in decreased cost of PJI.

Background Two-stage revision remains the standard of care for prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. However, there are substantial complications associated with articulating antibiotic hip spacers. Handmade and molded spacers have been shown to have higher rates of spacer fracture than antibiotic-coated prostheses (ACPs). The aim of this study is to review outcomes with an implant that is often categorized as an ACP spacer, the Zimmer-Biomet StageOne Select Femoral Spacer (ZBSO). Methods A retrospective review was performed of 63 patients who underwent placement of a ZBSO. Patients were compared based on whether or not an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) was performed using Fisher’s exact and t-tests. Results Five patients were excluded due to lack of follow-up or death shortly after stage 1 surgery, leaving 58 patients. Spacer fracture was noted in 5 of 58 patients (8.6%). Sixteen patients underwent ETO and 25.0% suffered a spacer fracture compared to 2.3% without ETO (odds ratio 13.7, P = .0248). There was no association between patient demographics or ETO length and spacer fracture. Two patients had periprosthetic fractures (3.4%) and 4 had dislocations (6.9%). Forty-nine patients (84.4%) went on to second-stage revision; of those 26.5% failed to clear the infection and required an average of 2.2 additional surgeries. Conclusion The ZBSO spacer has overall complication rates similar to previously reported spacer series. Although the ZBSO looks like an ACP spacer, in the setting of ETO, it behaves like a molded or handmade spacer with a high rate of spacer fracture (25%) due to the small diameter of the core. This implant should be used with caution in combination with an ETO.

Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a morbid complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PJI diagnosis and treatment has changed over time, and patient co-management with a high-volume musculoskeletal infectious disease (MSK ID) specialist has been implemented at our institution in the last decade. Methods We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive TJA patients treated for PJI between 1995 and 2018 by a single high-volume revision TJA surgeon. Microbial identities, antibiotic resistance, prior PJI, and MSK ID consultation were investigated. Results In total, 261 PJI patients (median age 66 years, interquartile range 57-75) were treated. One-year and 5-year reinfection rates were 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6-20.7) and 22.1% (95% CI 17.0-27.7), respectively. Microbial identities and antibiotic resistances did not change significantly over time. Despite seeing more prior PJI patients (53.3% vs 37.6%, P = .012), MSK ID-managed patients had similar infection rates as non-MSK ID-managed patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.6-1.75, P = .93). Prior PJI was associated with higher reinfection risk (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.39-4.12, P = .002) overall and in patients without MSK ID consultation, specifically (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.37-5.65, P = .005). This risk was somewhat lower and did not reach significance in prior PJI patients with MSK ID consultation (HR 1.97, 95% CI 0.87-4.48, P = .106). Conclusion We noted minimal differences in microbial/antibiotic resistances for PJI over 20 years in a single institution, suggesting current standards of PJI treatment remain encouragingly valid in most cases. MSK ID involvement was not associated with lower reinfection risk overall; however, in patients with prior PJI, the risk of reinfection appeared to be somewhat lower with MSK ID involvement. Level of Evidence Level IV–Case Series.

Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most frequent and devastating causes of short-term revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In vitro evidence suggests ceramic surfaces demonstrate resistance to biofilm, but the clinical effect of bearing surface modifications on the risk of PJI remains unclear. This premier registry-based study examines the influence of ceramic bearing surface coatings on the outcome in cemented primary TKA. Methods In total, 117,660 cemented primary TKAs in patients with primary osteoarthritis recorded in the German arthroplasty registry since 2012 were followed up for a maximum of 3 years. The primary endpoint was risk of revision for PJI on ceramic coated and uncoated cobalt-chromium-molybdenum femoral components. Propensity score matching for age, gender, obesity, diabetes mellitus, depression and Elixhauser comorbidity index, and substratification on common design twins with and without coating was performed. Results In total, 4637 TKAs (85.1% female) with a ceramic-coated femoral component were identified, 42 had been revised for PJI and 122 for other reasons at 3 years. No survival advantage due to the risk of revision for PJI could be determined for ceramic-coated components. Revision for all other reasons demonstrated a significant higher rate for TKAs with ceramic-coated components. However, the results of this were confounded by a strong prevalence (20.7% vs 0.3%) of metal sensitivity in the ceramic-coated group. Conclusion No evidence of reduced risk for PJI due to ceramic-coated implants in cemented primary TKA was found. Further analysis for revision reasons other than PJI is required.

Background Higher rates of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are related to patient risk factors and/or to special surgical procedures such as revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Among the measures discussed to better protect those patients from the higher infection risks use of dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement has emerged as a further prophylactic option. Methods This retrospective study included 246 patients undergoing strictly aseptic revision knee arthroplasty at our institution in the time period 2015-2018. Based on the type of bone cement used for the cementation of the revision prosthesis, 2 groups were defined. In total, 143 patients received the low-dose single antibiotic-loaded bone cement (SALBC) PALACOS R+G and 103 patients received the high-dose dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement (DALBC) COPAL G+C. The number of PJI cases in each group over a follow-up time of minimum 1 year was compared and the extra costs for the DALBC use calculated against the economic savings per each avoided PJI case on basis of 3 different assumptions (treatment costs and amount of cement use). Results Use of DALBC in aseptic rTKA was associated with a significant reduction in PJI cases (relative risk = 57%, PJI rate in the SALBC group 4.1% vs 0% in the DALBC group, P = 0.035). The calculated total savings per patient was $1367. Depending on the economic assumptions the range of savings was between $1413 (less favorable calculation model) and $3661 (most favorable calculation model). Conclusion The use of DALBC in rTKA has been found to be more effective in preventing PJI and proved cost-efficient in all our cost-calculation models.

Background Resection arthroplasty of the hip is considered a viable option after multiple failed attempts to eradicate a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, much less information about resection arthroplasty of the knee is available. The goals of this study were to determine the success of infection eradication with a resection arthroplasty of the knee and subsequent functional outcomes in this group. Methods We retrospectively identified 25 knees (23 patients) treated with resection arthroplasty of the knee for PJI performed at a single institution between 1974 and 2016. The mean age at resection arthroplasty was 65 years. The mean body mass index was 37 kg/m2, and the mean Charleston Comorbidity Index was 5. Patients had a mean of 5 operations on the knee (mean of 3 operations for infection) before the resection arthroplasty. Failure to eradicate the infection was defined as any reoperation for infection. Clinical outcomes were assessed via ambulatory status, use of gait aids, and ongoing pain. The mean follow-up was 4 years. Results At most recent follow-up, 84% (21 of 25) of knees were free of infection. Three patients had recurrent infection within the first year, and 1 patient had a late infection at 4 years postoperatively. However, only 1 patient required a subsequent amputation. Forty-five percent were community ambulators, 35% were household ambulators, and 20% were only able to transfer. All patients required knee bracing and assistive devices. Fifteen percent of patients were using long-term narcotics. Conclusion This large series demonstrates the results of selected use of resection arthroplasty as a treatment for recalcitrant periprosthetic knee infections that have failed multiple attempts to eradicate an ongoing PJI. The resection definitively solved the infection in 84% of patients. Functional results were variable but surprisingly good in some. All patients required bracing and assistive devices.

Background Diagnosing persistent infection following staged treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging. The alpha defensin (AD) test has been shown to be an accurate diagnostic test for the primary diagnosis PJI but has limited evaluation for use following a staged treatment of PJI. The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AD testing following staged treatment of PJI before reimplantation surgery and to determine if negative AD test predicted success following reimplantation using Delphi Criteria at time of last follow-up. Methods Patients who underwent AD testing prior to reimplantation after staged treatment of PJI (n = 52) were reviewed. Preoperative data (AD result, synovial fluid [SF], C-reactive protein level [mg/L], SF culture, SF white blood cell count, % of polymorphonuclear lymphocytes, serum C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and intraoperative data (purulence and tissue culture) were reviewed and used to classify patients using 2018 Musculoskeletal Infectious Disease Society criteria for infection, which was then used as a gold standard test to calculate diagnostic accuracy. Chart review was used to determine if patients who underwent reimplantation surgery would go on to treatment failure as defined by Delphi Criteria. Results The sensitivity and specificity of AD test result as compared with Musculoskeletal Infectious Disease Society criteria in diagnosing PJI was calculated to be 71% and 97.78%. Positive predictive value was calculated to be 83.3%, and negative predictive value was calculated to be 95.65%. Patients who underwent reimplantation (46/52 patients) all had negative AD test results, and 9/46 or 19.5% would have treatment failure as defined by the Delphi Criteria with an average follow-up of 588 days. Conclusion AD demonstrates high specificity and negative predictive value, with low sensitivity when utilized after staged treatment of PJI. Further investigation of this and other diagnostic tests following staged treatment of PJI is needed. Additionally, validated criteria used to identify persistent infection following staged treatment of PJI are required.

BACKGROUND Choosing the intervention for prosthetic joint infections, whether debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), or explant and antibiotic spacer placement, is multifactorial. One characteristic that may influence this decision is a previously established relationship with the patient. We hypothesized that patients receiving their arthroplasty at an outside institution and presenting with infection would be more likely to undergo removal of their implant without an attempt at DAIR compared to patients who underwent primary arthroplasty at the investigating institution. METHODS The institutional database was queried for primary total hip and knee arthroplasty infections. Manual review of medical records was performed, excluding patients who did not meet the Musculoskeletal Infection Society definition of infection. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, presenting infection characteristics, and surgical intervention were collected. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of treatment. RESULTS A total of 270 patients were included for analysis. McPherson score (P < .001) and duration of symptoms (P < .001) were associated with subsequent treatment. Additionally, when controlling for age, gender, symptom duration category, procedure, McPherson score, and American Society of Anesthesiologists category, patients with index procedures at outside hospitals were more likely to undergo implant removal (odds ratio, 36.30; 95% confidence interval, 8.16-161.51; P < .001). CONCLUSION Patients receiving their primary arthroplasty at an outside hospital and presenting with infection are more likely to undergo removal of hardware as their initial treatment. To avoid treatment bias, institutional protocols should be implemented to guide the shared decision-making process.

Background In addition to the significant morbidity and mortality associated with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), the cost of treating PJI is substantial. Prior high-quality national estimates of the economic burden of PJI utilize data up to 2009 to project PJI growth in the United States through 2020. Now in the year 2020, it is appropriate to evaluate these past projections and incorporate the latest available data to better understand the current scale and burden of PJI in the United States. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2002-2017) was used to identify rates and associated inpatient costs for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) and PJI-related revision TKA and THA. Poisson regression was utilized to model past growth and project future rates and cost of PJI of the hip and knee. Results Using the most recent data, the combined annual hospital costs related to PJI of the hip and knee were estimated to be $1.85 billion by 2030. This includes $753.4 million for THA PJI and $1.1 billion for TKA PJI, in that year. Increases in PJI costs are mainly attributable to increases in volume. Although the growth in incidence of primary THA and TKA has slowed in recent years, the incidence of PJI and the cost per case of PJI remained relatively constant from 2002 to 2017. Discussion Understanding the current and potential future financial burden of PJI for surgeons, patients, and healthcare systems is essential. There is an urgent need for efficacious preventive strategies in reducing rates of PJI after THA and TKA.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common cause of failure following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine the success of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in a large cohort of TKA PJIs and assess the utility of current classification systems in predicting DAIR outcomes in early postoperative, late hematogenous, and chronic PJIs.In a multicenter review over 15 years, 230 patients underwent DAIR for first episode PJI following primary TKA. Patient demographics, disease and surgical factors, treatment regime, and outcomes were identified. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to identify factors associated with successful DAIR. Continuous variables with predictive value were further analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves. The ability to predict DAIR outcomes of multiple classification systems was also assessed.Patients were followed for an average of 6.9 years. The overall success rate of DAIR was 53.9%. On receiver operating characteristic analysis, 3 months (area under the curve = 0.63) and 1-year age (area under the curve = 0.66) of implant cut-offs was similarly predictive of outcomes. On multivariate survival analysis, DAIR was successful in 64% of "early" PJIs (implant1 year) vs 38% of "late hematogenous" PJIs (implant1 year; odds ratio [OR] 1.78, P = .01). For late PJIs (implant1 year), Staphylococcus aureus (OR 4.70, P.001) and gram-negative infections (OR 2.56, P = .031) were risk factors for DAIR failure.DAIR has a high failure rate in all PJIs occurring more than a year post primary TKA, particularly when caused by S aureus or gram-negative bacteria. The age of implant is an important predictor of DAIR outcomes.

It is important to identify risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty in order to mitigate the substantial social and economic burden. The objective of this study is to evaluate early aseptic revision surgery as a potential risk factor for PJI following total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Patients who underwent primary THA or TKA with early aseptic revision were identified in 2 national insurance databases. Control groups of patients who did not undergo revision were identified and matched 10:1 to study patients. Rates of PJI at 1 and 2 years postoperatively following revision surgery were calculated and compared to controls using a logistic regression analysis.In total, 328 Medicare and 222 Humana patients undergoing aseptic revision THA within 1 year of index THA were found to have significantly increased risk of PJI at 1 year (5.49% vs 0.91%, odds ratio [OR] 5.61, P.001 for Medicare; 7.21% vs 0.68%, OR 11.34, P.001 for Humana) and 2 years (5.79% vs 1.10%, OR 4.79, P.001 for Medicare; 8.11% vs 1.04%, OR 9.05, P.001 for Humana). Similarly for TKA, 190 Medicare and 226 Humana patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA within 1 year were found to have significantly higher rates of PJI at 1 year (6.48% vs 1.16%, OR 7.69, P.001 for Medicare; 6.19% vs 1.28%, OR 4.89, P.001 for Humana) and 2 years (8.42% vs 1.58%, OR 6.57, P.001 for Medicare; 7.08% vs 1.50%, OR 4.50, P.001 for Humana).Early aseptic revision surgery following THA and TKA is associated with significantly increased risks of subsequent PJI within 2 years.

It is vital for orthopedic residents and residency programs to have a current understanding of the materials and resources utilized on the Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) to tailor resident educational curricula accordingly. This study presents an updated analysis of the hip and knee section of the OITE.All OITE questions related to hip and knee reconstruction over six examinations between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed for topic, subtopic, taxonomy, imaging modalities, resident performance, and references.There were 166 hip and knee reconstruction questions of 1600 OITE questions (10.4%) over a six-year period. The most commonly tested topics include mechanical properties of total knee and hip implants (10.8%), instability after THA (10.8%), periprosthetic fracture (10.2%), and prosthetic joint infection (10.2%). A total of 362 references were cited from 68 different sources. The most common sources were JOA, JBJS, JAAOS, and CORR, which were collectively responsible for 68% of all citations. There was an average publication lag of 7.1 years, with 75% of all citations falling within 10 years of the question date. Compared with a prior analysis from 2005 and 2009, there were significantly more complex multistep questions regarding treatment and fewer one-step knowledge recall questions (P = .003). Similarly, recent tests had significantly more questions involving interpretation of radiographs (55%, P.001) and advanced imaging (9.6%, P.001), compared with a decade ago.The OITE continues to evolve over time, incorporating recent literature and topics. The current analysis identifies high-yield topics and resources that can guide resident preparation for the OITE hip and knee section.

Background Recent reports highlighted the association between smoking and higher risk of postsurgical infections. The aim was to compare the incidence of prosthetic joint infection after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) according to smoking status. Methods A prospective hospital registry–based cohort study was performed including all primary knee and hip TJAs performed between March 1996 and December 2013. Smoking status preoperatively was classified into never, former, and current smoker. Incidence rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for prosthetic joint infection according to smoking status were assessed within the first year and beyond. Results We included 8559 primary TJAs (mean age 69.5 years), and median follow-up was 67 months. There were 5722 never, 1315 former, and 1522 current smokers. Incidence rates of infection within the first year for never, former, and current smokers were, respectively, 4.7, 10.1, and 10.9 cases/1000 person-years, comparing ever vs never smokers, crude and adjusted HRs were 2.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-3.98) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.04-3.2). Beyond the first year, crude and adjusted HRs were 1.37 (95% CI 0.78-2.39) and 1.12 (95% CI 0.61-2.04). Conclusion Smoking increased the infection risk about 1.8 times after primary hip or knee TJA in both current and former smokers. Beyond the first year, the infection risk was similar to never smokers.

INTRODUCTION: Irrigation and debridement with modular component exchange (IDMCE) can treat prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Compared to two-stage revision, IDMCE is associated with lower morbidity, but may carry higher infection recurrence rates. We aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with successful IDMCE following patients with PJI. METHODS: We identified 99 consecutive patients who underwent IDMCE following TKA PJI at a tertiary academic medical center from November 2009 through January 2016. Examined variables included age, gender, symptom duration, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, total protein, albumin, hemoglobin A1c, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, gram stain results, final cultures, and use of long-term antibiotic suppression. Success was defined as no further operation on the ipsilateral knee. We used t-tests and chi-squared analyses to determine whether each preoperative factor was associated with IDMCE reoperation. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 2.6 years, 64 patients who underwent IDMCE were defined as successful. Thirty-five patients required one or more additional procedures for recurrent infection; of these, 20 patients underwent two-stage revision. Patients with symptom duration of less than two days avoided additional surgery in 88% of cases. Elevated ESR >47mm/hr was the only variable associated with reoperation (P=0.005). There were no associations among the other examined variables. CONCLUSION: Using IDMCE for PJI after TKA required reoperation in 35% of cases. Elevated preoperative ESR laboratory values and duration of symptoms >2 days were associated with re-operation.

With the increased demand for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and corresponding rise in revision procedures, it is imperative to understand the factors contributing to the development of Clostridium difficile colitis. We aimed to provide a detailed analysis of: (1) the incidence of; (2) the demographics, lengths of stay, and total costs for; and (3) the risk factors and mortality associated with the development of C. difficile colitis after revision THA.The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for all individuals diagnosed with a periprosthetic joint infection and who underwent all-component revision THA between 2009 and 2013 (n = 40,876). Patients who developed C. difficile colitis during their inpatient hospital stay were identified. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between hospital- and patient-specific characteristics and the development of C. difficile colitis.The overall incidence of C. difficile colitis after revision THA was 1.7%. These patients were significantly older (74 vs 65 years), had greater lengths of hospital stay (19 vs 9 days), accumulated greater costs ($51,641 vs $28,282), and were more often treated in an urban hospital compared to their counterparts who did not develop C. difficile colitis (P.001 for all). Patients with colitis also had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those without (5.6% vs 1.4%; P.001).While C. difficile colitis infection is an uncommon event following revision THA, it can have potentially devastating consequences. Our analysis demonstrates that this infection is associated with a longer hospital stay, higher costs, and greater in-hospital mortality.

Background: A significant amount of patients undergoing revision surgery of a prosthetic joint turn out to have an infection. Withholding preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in these patients to optimize culture yield during revision surgery remains a matter of debate. The aim of our study was to determine (1) the rate of positive intraoperative cultures with or without preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and (2) the incidence of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) during the follow-up in the 2 groups.Methods: Medical files of patients in whom preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was withheld until culture samples were taken (2007-2010, n = 284) and in whom antibiotic prophylaxis was given during the induction of anesthesia (2010-2013, n = 141) were retrospectively reviewed.Results: The percentage of >= 1 positive cultures was the same in the group without (26%) and with preoperative prophylaxis (27%; P value, .7). PJI was diagnosed during revision surgery according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria in 6.7% patients not receiving preoperative prophylaxis and in 7.0% receiving it (P value, .79). We found no important differences in the type of microorganisms that were isolated in both groups. During a 3-month follow-up, an early PJI developed in patients undergoing total revision surgery in 6.4% of the nonpreoperative prophylaxis group vs 1.6% in the preoperative prophylaxis group (P value, .1).Conclusion: Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis does not reduce culture yield in patients undergoing knee revision surgery. Our data show a trend toward a higher PJI rate in the postoperative period of total revision surgery when preoperative prophylaxis is withheld.

Background The risk of prosthetic joint infection increases with Staphylococcus aureus colonization. The cost-effectiveness of decolonization is controversial. We evaluated cost-effectiveness decolonization protocols in high-risk arthroplasty patients. Methods An analytical model evaluated risk under 3 protocols: 4 swabs, 2 swabs, and nasal swab alone. These were compared to no-screening and universal decolonization strategies. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the hospital, patient, and societal perspective. Results Under base case conditions, universal decolonization and 4-swab strategies were most effective. The 2-swab and universal decolonization strategy were most cost-effective from patient and societal perspectives. From the hospital perspective, universal decolonization was the dominant strategy (much less costly and more effective). Conclusion S aureus decolonization may be cost-effective for reducing prosthetic joint infections in high-risk patients. These results may have important implications for treatment of patients and for cost containment in a bundled payment system.

© 2019 Elsevier Inc. Background: Rotating hinge knee prostheses (with or without distal femoral replacement) are indicated in cases of unreconstructible bony or soft tissue compromise. Despite their versatility, these implants have demonstrated high rates of mechanical failure. We aimed to review clinical outcomes of a novel hinged knee arthroplasty system. Methods: We reviewed all cases in a prospective database of hinged total knee arthroplasty (with and without distal femoral arthroplasty) involving a single manufacturer's implant system at a large tertiary-level academic health sciences center. We collected reasons for surgery, implant survivorship, reasons for revision, and clinical outcomes (Short Form 12, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Knee Society Scores). Results: Seventy-six cases of hinged knee implants using the knee system under investigation were performed (39 hinged total knee and 37 distal femoral replacements) between 2011 and 2018, inclusive. Indications for surgery varied, with second-stage reimplantation most common for rotating hinge and fracture most common for distal femoral arthroplasty. There were 6 revisions in the rotating hinge group (none for aseptic loosening) and 5 in the distal femoral arthroplasty group (1 for aseptic loosening). Average follow-up was 2.89 ± 2.09 years. Postoperative Short Form 12 (Physical Component), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Knee Society Scores were 30.12 ± 10.17, 55.90 ± 21.51, and 115.62 ± 45.20, respectively. Conclusion: This novel hinged knee system is a highly durable option for complex and revision knee arthroplasty. Early failures tend to be secondary to infection. We observed only a single case of aseptic loosening. Although these early results are encouraging, ongoing follow-up is required to determine long-term prognosis in patients receiving this implant.

Background The purpose of this study was to compare patients who had chronic prosthetic joint infection treated using three methods of articulating polymethylmethacrylate spacers in two-stage reimplantation. Methods We identified 77 patients who had chronic prosthetic joint infection with a minimum of one-year follow-up. Reinfection rates were determined using modified International Consensus group criteria. Results The overall reinfection rate was 18% (14 of 77 patients). Despite a higher medical comorbidity in the second-generation spacer cohort, there were no statistical differences in reinfection rates between articulating spacer types. Conclusion This study suggests that there were no differences in efficacy between the traditional molded, first-generation premolded, and second-generation premolded articulating spacers, but more studies with high level of evidence are needed.

Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and costs. We developed a fast-track PJI care system using an infectious disease physician to work directly with the TJA service and coordinate in the treatment of PJI patients. We hypothesized that streamlined care of patients with hip and knee PJI decreases the length of the acute hospital stay without increasing the risk of complication or incorrect antibiotic selection. Methods A single-center retrospective chart review was performed for all patients treated operatively for PJI. A cohort of 78 fast-track patients was compared to 68 control patients treated before the implementation of the program. Hospital length of stay (LOS) and cases of antibiotic mismatch were primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes, including 90-day readmissions, reoperations, mortality, rate of reimplantation, and 12-month reimplant survival, were compared. Cox regressions were analyzed to assess the effects on LOS of patient demographics and the type of surgery performed. Results Average hospital LOS from infection surgery to discharge was significantly lower in the fast-track cohort (3.8 vs 5.7 days; P = .012). There were no episodes of antibiotic mismatch in the fast-track group vs 1 recorded episode in the control group. No significant differences were noted comparing 90-day complications, reimplantation rate, or 12-month reimplant survival rates. Conclusion Through the utilization of an orthopedic-specific infectious disease physician, a fast-track PJI protocol can significantly shorten hospital LOS while remaining safe. Streamlining care pathways may help decrease the overall healthcare costs associated with treating PJI.

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the alpha defensin qualitative detection (ADLF) sensitivity and specificity as compared with 3 standard classifications in the diagnostic management of chronic prosthetic joint infections. Materials and methods A multicenter cohort of 136 patients with a painful arthroplasty was classified into either infected or noninfected according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) score, Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) score, European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) score. The sensitivity and specificity of the ADLF test were calculated for each score. Spearman’s correlations between all scores were then analyzed, and multiple logistic regression was applied to identify independent variables strongly connected to the prosthetic joint infection probability. Results The EBJIS score was positive in 68 patients, IDSA score in 50 patients, MSIS score in 41 patients, and ADLF in 40 patients. The ADLF sensitivity was 87.8% compared with MSIS, 70% compared with IDSA, and 55.8% compared with EBJIS. The ADLF specificity was in the range of 94%-97%. A good correlation was observed between synovial fluid cultures and ADLF (r = 0.73). Low to excellent correlations were recorded between ADLF and the EBJIS (r = 0.58), IDSA (r = 0.68), and MSIS (r = 0.84) scores. The synovial fluid’s white blood cell count was proven to be the biological test that most influenced the probability of a positive culture (P value: .005). Discussion The ADLF sensitivity was variable, whereas its specificity was excellent. The EBJIS score results significantly differed from those obtained via cultures, which possibly explains the ADLF low sensitivity compared with that of the EBJIS score.

Background The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging because no single test has consistently demonstrated an adequate discriminative potential. The combination of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) with adequate thresholds is well established. This study sought to investigate the role of plasma viscosity (PV) in the diagnosis of PJI following painful total knee arthroplasty. Methods The medical notes, and hematological and microbiology results of 310 patients who underwent revision for a painful total knee arthroplasty were evaluated. Infection was confirmed using Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria in 102 patients (32.9%), whereas 208 patients (67.1%) were classified as noninfected. Serum investigations including ESR, CRP, and PV were analyzed using receiver observer curves and optimal cutoff points identified. Results There was a strong correlation between PV and both ESR and CRP. The area under curve was 0.814 for PV and 0.812 for ESR. Statistical analysis showed noninferiority of PV as compared to ESR in diagnosing PJI. A PV value of ≥ 1.81 mPa.s. had the best efficiency of 82.1%. Combining a CRP ≥ 13.5 mg/L with a PV ≥ 1.81 mPa.s. in a serial test approach yielded the highest specificity of 97.9% and positive likelihood ratio of 22.8. Sensitivity was 47.9% and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.53. Conclusion PV is noninferior to ESR in diagnosing PJI. Its use is justified in clinical practice. It is cheaper, quicker, more efficient, and not influenced by hematocrit levels or medication. In this cohort, a PV value ≥ 1.81 mPa.s. would be an adequate cutoff to diagnose PJI in combination with CRP ≥ 13.5 mg/L.

Background Antibiotic cement spacers are used during 2-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection. Complications including dislocation and periprosthetic fracture have been reported but a large cohort comparing spacer design features is lacking. We aimed to determine if spacer design is associated with perioperative complications. Methods We performed a retrospective review of antibiotic cement spacers implanted between 2004 and 2014. Radiographic assessment included leg length, offset, and bone loss (Paprosky classification). Clinical outcomes included dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, spacer fracture, infection cure, and overall reoperation rate. Univariate analysis, Student’s t-test, chi-squared test, or Kruskal-Wallis test was employed (P Results One hundred eighty-five patients were treated: 42% were female and mean age was 64 years (range 24-93, standard deviation 13.6). Spacer types were (1) molded (53%), (2) antibiotic-coated prosthesis (30%), (3) handmade (12%); and (4) prefabricated (4%). Cemented acetabular liners were used in 3% (6/185). There was no loss to follow-up during the interstage period. Spacer complications occurred in 26% (48/185). Dislocation occurred in 9% (17/185) and was associated with reduced femoral offset of >5 mm (P = .033) and increased bone loss (P = .01). Spacer fracture occurred in 8% (14/185); 12% (12/97) molded versus 8% (2/23) handmade (P = .02). Periprosthetic femur fracture was associated with increased offset >5 mm (P = .01) and extended trochanteric osteotomy (P = .001). Conclusion During 2-stage total hip arthroplasty, antibiotic-loaded cement spacers had an overall complication rate of 26%. Spacer design, acetabular and femoral bone loss, and offset restoration were significantly associated with perioperative complications. We recommend the optimization of antibiotic-loaded cement spacer placement to minimize potential complications by focusing on restoration of leg-length and offset, ensuring adequate femoral fixation and paying attention to selection of an appropriate head/neck ratio.

Sarcopenia, an age-related loss of muscle mass and function, has been previously linked to an increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and infection after a variety of surgical procedures. This study is the first to evaluate the impact of the psoas-lumbar vertebral index (PLVI), a validated marker for central sarcopenia, on determining post-arthroplasty infection status.This is a case-control, retrospective review of 30 patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria compared to 69 control patients who underwent a total hip or knee arthroplasty. All patients had a recent computed tomography scan of the abdomen/pelvis to calculate the PLVI. PLVI was evaluated alongside age, gender, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and smoking status to determine the predictive value for infection.Notably, the infected group had a large, significant difference in their average PLVI (0.736 vs 0.963, P.001). The patient's PLVI was a predictor of infection status, with a higher PLVI being protective against infection (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.109-0.715, P = .008). Additional predictors of infection status were higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR 10.634, 95% CI 3.112-36.345, P.001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.438, 95% CI 1.155-1.791, P = .001). Multivariate, binary logistic regression analysis confirmed that PLVI was a significant independent predictor of infection status (B = -0.685, P = .039).PLVI, a marker for central sarcopenia, was demonstrated to be a risk factor for PJI. Further research and consideration of sarcopenia as a screening and optimizable risk factor for total joint arthroplasty must be explored.

Background: Persistent wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an important complication with potential substantial adverse consequences, in particular periprosthetic joint infection. Methods: This review evaluated the available literature regarding several issues in the field of persistent wound drainage after TJA and offers a classification of persistent wound drainage and an algorithmic approach to the decision-making process. Results: Available literature addressing the diagnosis and treatment of persistent wound drainage after TJA is scarce and an evidence-based clinical guideline is lacking. This is partially caused by the absence of a universally accepted definition of persistent wound drainage. In patients with persistent wound drainage, clinical signs and serological tests can be helpful in the diagnosis of a developing infection. Regarding the treatment of persistent wound drainage, nonsurgical treatment consists of absorbent dressings, pressure bandages, and temporary joint immobilization. Surgical treatment is advised when wound drainage persists for more than 5-7 days and consists of open debridement with irrigation and exchange of modular components and antimicrobial treatment. Conclusion: Based on this literature review, we proposed a classification and algorithmic approach for the management of patients with persistent wound drainage after TJA. Hopefully, this offers the orthopedic surgeon a practical clinical guideline by finding the right balance between overtreatment and undertreatment, weighing the risks and benefits. However, this classification and algorithmic approach should first be evaluated in a prospective trial. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Background Synovial analysis of joint aspirates is a key diagnostic tool; all major diagnostic algorithms include cell count (CC) and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) as important criteria to make the diagnosis. In this context, we conducted this study to analyze the overall accuracy of CC and PMN%. Methods A single-center retrospective analysis was performed with clinical data of included patients, with a total of 524 preoperative joint aspirations (255 hips, 269 knees). From the aspirated synovial fluid, we tested the leukocyte esterase activity, leukocyte CC, and PMN%, and sent specimens for aerobic and anaerobic bacterial culture. Depending on the clinical results in accordance with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for prosthetic joint infection (PJI), 203 patients were then admitted for aseptic revision and 134 patients for septic exchange. Results In 337 cases (64.3% of the study patients), it was possible to measure the CC. The best cutoff level for PJI of all study patients was 2582 leukocytes/μL (sensitivity [SE] 80.6%, specificity [SP] 85.2%) and a PMN% of 66.1% (SE 80.6%, SP 83.3%). The chosen cutoff levels for PJI of total knee and total hip arthroplasty were 1630 leukocytes/μL (SE 83.6%, SP 82.2%) and a PMN% of 60.5% (SE 80.3%, SP 77.1%) and 3063 leukocytes/μL (SE 78.1%, SP 80.0%) and a PMN% of 66.1% (SE 82.2%, SP 82.4%), respectively. Conclusions CC and PMN% are sensitive methods for diagnosing PJI of total hip and total knee arthroplasty. However, there are differences in cutoff levels between knees and hips. International guidelines and diagnostic criteria need revisions in terms of these parameters.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee remains one of the most common and feared arthroplasty complications. The impact and cost of PJI is significant, both to the patient and to the health care system. Recent reports of results of different treatment strategies have led many surgeons to modify their approach to management of PJI. This paper will explore apparent paradigm shifts, both to indications and technique, including the importance of waiting for bacterial identification, the decreasing role for irrigation and debridement (I&D) with retention of components, the increased utilization of single stage revision, and conversely a decreasing role for two-stage exchange. Strategies for treating drug-resistant organisms and management of failed treatment will also be examined.

Diabetic patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with postoperative hyperglycemia200 mg/dL have increased the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). We investigated the correlation between preoperative hemoglobin A1c (A1c) and postoperative hyperglycemia in diabetic patients undergoing TJA.A retrospective review of 773 diabetic patients undergoing TJA was conducted. A Youden's J computational analysis determined the A1c where postoperative glucose levels200 mg/dL were statistically more likely. Patients were then stratified into 3 groups: A1c7%, A1c 7.0-8.0%, and A1c8.0%. Outcomes included the highest postoperative in-hospital serum glucose level and PJI.We determined an A1c7.45% resulted in a greater chance of postoperative hyperglycemia200 mg/dL. Average postoperative serum glucose increased with A1c (A1c7 = 167 mg/dL, A1c 7.0-8.0 = 240 mg/dL, and A1c8 = 276 mg/dL, P.0001). PJI did not statistically increase with A1c (2.25%, 1.99%, and 4.55%, respectively, P = .4319).Preoperative hemoglobin A1c levels correlate with postoperative glucose levels. We recommend using an A1c cutoff of 7.45% for patients undergoing TJA and suggest that caution should be exercised in patients with elevated A1c levels undergoing TJA.

We performed this study to compare prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and renal toxicity rates following hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA) when a first-generation cephalosporin was administered either alone or in combination with a single preoperative vancomycin dose, whether vancomycin administration timing potentially influenced dual-antibiotic PJI prophylaxis approach effectiveness, and whether single-dose vancomycin use increased risk of renal impairment.This was a retrospective study of 1997 consecutive primary TJAs (1871 patients) treated with cefazolin alone (1044 TJAs) or cefazolin with single-dose vancomycin (953 TJAs). The vancomycin group included 476 TJAs (450 patients) with infusion started at least 45 minutes before the skin incision and 477 TJAs (464 patients) with infusion started less than 45 minutes before the skin incision.The addition of a single dose of vancomycin did not significantly reduce PJI rates when compared with cefazolin alone (1.6% vs 2.1%, P = .32). However, the PJI rate was significantly lower following primary TJA when vancomycin administration was initiated at least 45 minutes before incision (0.2%) when compared with other TJA procedures performed using cefazolin and vancomycin (2.9%, P.01) or cefazolin alone (2.1%, P.01). We observed no difference in renal toxicity between treatment groups.In our institution, the addition of vancomycin to cefazolin at least 45 minutes before incision reduced PJI infection rates in primary hip and knee TJA with a low risk of renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: The role of space suits in the prevention of orthopaedic prosthetic joint infection remains unclear. Recent evidence suggests space suits may in fact contribute to increased infection rates, with bioaerosol emissions from space suits identified as a potential cause. This study aimed to compare the particle and microbiological emission rates of space suits and standard surgical clothing. METHODS: A comparison of emission rates between space suits and standard surgical clothing was performed in a simulated surgical environment during five separate experiments. Particle counts were analysed with two separate particle counters capable of detecting particles between 0.1 and 20 μm. An Andersen Impactor was used to sample bacteria, with culture counts performed at 24 and 48 hours. RESULTS: Four experiments consistently showed statistically significant increases in both particle and microbiological emission rates when space suits are used compared with standard surgical clothing. One experiment showed inconsistent results, with a trend towards increases in both particle and microbiological emission rates when space suits are used compared with standard surgical clothing. CONCLUSION: Space suits cause increased particle and microbiological emission rates compared with standard surgical clothing. This finding provides mechanistic evidence to support the increased prosthetic joint infection rates observed in clinical studies.

The aim of our study was to determine the potential influence of blood transfusion and the length of storage of packed red blood cells (RBC) on prosthetic joint infection after primary knee arthroplasty. From November 2007 to November 2009, all variables potentially associated with deep infection were registered in 1331 consecutive patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Infection was diagnosed in 32 (2.4%) patients. After adjusting for important variables, blood transfusion with RBCs stored >14days was the strongest predictive factor for prosthetic joint infection within 90days after primary knee arthroplasty (OR: 5.9, 95% CI: 2.6-13.2, P < 0.001). Blood saving techniques are desirable to reduce perioperative blood transfusion.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after THA is a major complication with an incidence of 1%-3%. We report our experiences with a technique using a custom-made articulating spacer (CUMARS) at the first of two-stage treatment for PJI. This technique uses widely available all-polyethylene acetabular components and the Exeter Universal stem, fixed using antibiotic loaded acrylic cement. Seventy-six hips were treated for PJI using this technique. Performed as the first of a two-stage procedure, good functional results were commonly seen, leading to postponing second stage indefinitely with retention of the CUMARS prosthesis in 34 patients. The CUMARS technique presents an alternative to conventional spacers, using readily available components that are well tolerated, allowing weight bearing and mobility, and achieving comparable eradication rates.

Topical vancomycin powder (VP) has shown efficacy and safety in decreasing post-operative spine infections. VP use in arthroplasty has not been established. Concerns remain for third-body wear with the addition of crystalline substrate at the implant interface. The study's purpose was to compare wear behavior of CoCr on UHMWPE to identical wear couples with VP. A six-station wear simulator was utilized and cyclic articulations were run for 10 million cycles (Mc). UHMWPE wear was measured using photography, stereomicroscopy, and gravimetric measurement. There were no differences in wear mark length (P = 0.43), width (P = 0.49), or gravimetric wear at 10 Mc (P = 0.98). VP and control groups lost 0.32 and 0.33 mg, respectively. VP may have a role in PJI prevention. A well-designed clinical study is needed.

Two-stage revision is widely used for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections. However, the duration of antibiotic treatment between stages and role of reimplantation microbiology are controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome and influence of the reimplantation microbiology of two-staged revisions with 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment. We retrospectively reviewed 107 patients treated with two-stage revision between 2001 and 2009. The overall treatment success rate was 94.4%. The reimplantation cultures were positive in 5/97 (5.2%) cases, and only one of them failed. Therefore, we achieved excellent results with a 6-week course of antibiotics between stages in two-stage revision. Positive reimplantation cultures do not seem to be associated with worse outcomes.

Background Surgical site infection and nosocomial infections in general have appropriately undergone increased scrutiny over the last decade. Numerous studies have documented pathogenic bacterial contamination of personal items such as cell phones, pagers, ties, and pens in the hospital setting. It is our understanding that Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations requires all personnel to wear an identification badge at all times, which includes the operating room environment. Methods Badges, lanyards, and pagers from operating room personnel were swabbed and cultured using the same protocol used for surgical specimens in the operating rooms. Personnel included orthopedic attendings (14), orthopedic residents (20), nurses (19), and anesthesia personnel (11). Results A total of 64 badges were sampled, with no methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) cultured on any of the badges. Two of 64 had enterococcus (3%), and 1 of those was vancomycin resistant. Pagers had similar results, with only 1/42 growing MSSA or enterococcus (2.4%), and no MRSA. Lanyards showed higher rates of contamination. There were 11% with MSSA or MRSA out of 27 sampled. Highest contamination rates were with orthopedic staff and resident lanyards, with 3/22 (13.6%) growing MSSA or MRSA. No lanyards grew enterococcus. When comparing rates of MSSA and/or MRSA between groups, lanyards had a statistically significant higher rate ( P Conclusion At a minimum, operating room personnel should probably not use lanyards to display their ID badges.

Traditionally, periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) due to gram-negative organisms are considered more difficult to manage; however, little literature exists with regard to outcome of PJI caused by gram-negative organisms. We identified 277 patients with 282 culture-positive PJI receiving surgical treatment. Thirty-one joints were treated for gram-negative PJI. The gram-negative group was then compared with the gram-positive and polymicrobial PJI. A single debridement and retention of prosthesis were successful in 70% (7/10) of isolated gram negative compared with 33.3% (13/39) of methicillin-sensitive gram positive, 48.9% (23/47) of methicillin-resistant gram positive, and 57.1% (4/7) of polymicrobial. Of those patients undergoing a planned 2-stage exchange, a successful reimplantation was performed in 52% (12/23) of gram-negative, 51% (52/103) of methicillin-resistant gram-positive, 69% (65/94) of methicillin-sensitive gram-positive, and 0% (0/8) of polymicrobial PJI cases. These results indicate that PJI due to gram-negative pathogens, although less common, is difficult to treat and is associated with limited success.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of increased inflammatory laboratory markers in patients with periprosthetic fractures. We also studied the likelihood of the elevation of these values in predicting deep prosthetic joint infection. From 2000 to 2006, 204 patients with periprosthetic hip fractures were treated at our institution. Patients had white blood cell, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein obtained on initial evaluation; these were then compared with subsequent hip aspiration, surgical pathology, and deep cultures obtained at the time of revision surgery. A true infection was diagnosed in 11.6%. White blood cell count was increased in 16.2%, erythrocyte sedimentation rate increased in 33.3%, and C-reactive protein increased in 50.5%. The positive elaborate predictive value for these markers for infection was poor (18%, 21%, and 29%, respectively). These findings suggest that increased inflammatory laboratory values in patients with periprosthetic fracture are not good indicators for deep periprosthetic infection and do not necessarily warrant additional evaluations before definitive surgical treatment.

To study the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus carriage and the impact of preoperatively treating carriers in prosthetic joint infection (PJI), a prospective randomized trial was organized. From January 2010 to December 2012, 1028 of 1305 total joint arthroplasties performed were screened, and selected carriers underwent preoperative decolonization. We observed a 22.2% (228/1028) S aureus colonization rate and only 0.8% methicillin-resistant S aureus. Prosthetic joint infection rate was higher, albeit not significantly, in S aureus carriers than among noncarriers-3.9% (9/228) vs 2.0% (16/800). Treated and untreated carriers showed no significant differences-3.4% (3/89) vs 4.3% (6/139). Most of the 14 S aureus PJI occurred in noncarriers suggesting a lack of causal relation between nasal and PJI S aureus. No clear benefit in screening/decolonizing carriers before total joint arthroplasty could be demonstrated.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has moved into the first place as the cause of failure following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recent studies have shown that PJI results in higher mortality in patients than many cancers. The economic burden of treating PJI is likely to exceed $1 billion this year in the US. Thus, it is paramount that all efforts are invested to prevent this dreaded complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This article summarizes some of the most effective and proven strategies for prevention of PJI. It is hoped that the article will be of benefit to the readers of the journal.

The relevance of wound complications in association with acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is well known. However, whether a successfully treated superficial infection can result in a chronic deep infection remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, treatment and late complications of superficial wound infections following TKA. In a 3000 TKA prospective cohort, 45 superficial infections were diagnosed and treated successfully with antibiotic therapy along with or without surgical debridement. None of the cases developed deep chronic PJI at 70 months of follow-up. Three cases were in need of a TKA exchange due to aseptic loosening. A successfully treated superficial wound infection does not result in a chronic deep TKA infection.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with a higher mortality, morbidity and economic costs. Although it is well known that the presence of urinary tract infection (UTI) is associated with PJI, few investigations evaluated the preoperative asymptomatic leukocyturia (ASL) and the possible relationship with early PJI. We reviewed the records of 739 patients performed primary joint arthroplasty. A total of 131 patients had preoperative ASL (17.7%) and 7 of 739 patients (0.9%) had early PJI. Preoperative ASL was not confirmed as a risk factor for early PJI on the multivariate regression analysis with an adjusted OR of 1.04 (P>0.05). Therefore, it should not be considered as a reason for postponement of total joint arthroplasty.