Search

Background Physician rating websites have become an increasingly popular medium for patients to give feedback and to obtain information about physicians. Each physician rating website uses different criteria to evaluate physicians, with the option for patients to provide written reviews. Our goal is to identify factors that patients value when seeking an orthopedic surgeon. Methods The study design was observational. We analyzed 7 common physician rating websites ( RateMDs.com , HealthGrades.com , Vitals.com , WebMD.com , CareDash.com , Wellness.com , and ZocDoc.com ) to evaluate orthopedic surgeon ratings and examine the variables that influence these ratings. Numeric ratings were standardized on a scale from 0-100 (higher number = positive rating). Multilevel mixed-effect Poisson regression models were used where appropriate. Results A total of 11,527 online reviews of orthopedic surgeons in a single metropolitan area were evaluated in April 2019. The average overall rating was positive at 83.66 (±12.33) on our scale. The majority of surgeons amassed ≤20 reviews on each website. Higher ratings were correlated with staff friendliness (P = .010), punctuality (P = .009), and knowledge/expertise (P = .031). Analysis of written reviews showed that resolution of original patient complaints was associated with a high-scoring review. Conclusion This study may impact the ability of orthopedic surgeons to improve patient satisfaction and experience. The online image of orthopedic surgeons is positive in general, with weight placed on timeliness, knowledge, and staff friendliness. Further study is needed to examine whether differences exist in patient-centric domains reviewing orthopedic subspecialties. Future multiple geographic area studies will help elucidate any regional variation in patient-recorded data, as well as the role of any participation bias.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is an alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to determine implant survivorship, analyze patient-reported outcomes measures and to determine patient satisfaction for patients who underwent metal-on-metal hip resurfacing at a large US academic institution by a single surgeon with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.Patients who underwent hip resurfacing from September 2006 through November 2009 were included. Patient demographics and variables were collected from a prospectively maintained institutional database and patients completed an additional questionnaire with patient-reported outcomes measures.A total of 350 patients (389 hips) out of 371 (433 hips) with a minimum 10-year follow-up were successfully contacted (94.3% follow-up). Mean age was 53 years, 258 were male (73%). 377 out of 389 hips (96.9%) did not require additional surgery. Gender was significantly related to implant survivorship (males 99.0%, females 90.9%; P.001). 330 patients (369 hips, 94.8%) were satisfied with their surgery. Males had higher proportion of satisfaction scores (P = .02) and higher modified Harris Hip Score (odds ratio = 2.63 (1.39, 4.98), P = .003). Median modified Harris Hip Score score for non-revised hips was 84.0 [80.0; 86.0] versus those requiring revision, 81.5 [74.0; 83.0], (P = .009).At a minimum 10-year follow-up, hip resurfacing, using an implant with a good track record, demonstrates 99.0% survivorship in male patients with an average age of 52 years. We believe that the continued use of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty in this population is justified by both positive patient reported outcomes and survivorship.

It is important to study the incidence and causes of readmissions in order to understand why they occur and how to reduce them. This study looks at a national sample of patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to identify incidences, trends, causes, and timing of 30-day readmissions.Patients undergoing primary TKA from 2012 to 2016 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified (n = 197,192). Patients with fractures (n = 177), nonelective surgery (n = 2234), bilateral TKA (n = 5483), and cases with unknown readmission status (n = 1047) were excluded, leaving a total of 188,251 cases. Linear regression analysis was used to determine trends over time.The incidence of overall 30-day readmission following primary TKA from 2012 to 2016 was 3.19% (6014/188,251), with significant decreases in readmission rates during this time (β = -0.001, P.001). The top 5 causes of readmission included superficial surgical site infection (SSI; 9.7%), non-SSI infection (9.5%), cardiovascular complications (CV; 9.3%), gastrointestinal complications (8.8%), and venous thromboembolisms (8.8%). The most common cause of readmission during postoperative week 1 was CV complications (12.2%), week 2 was superficial SSI (11.6%), week 3 was deep SSI (11.4%), and week 4 was deep SSI (12.4%).Overall, 30-day readmissions following TKA were found to significantly decline from 2012 to 2016. The most common causes of overall readmission included superficial SSI, non-SSI infection, CV complications, gastrointestinal complications, and venous thromboembolisms. However, the most common causes of readmission changed from week to week postoperatively. This data may help institutions develop policies to prevent unplanned readmissions following TKA.

Background Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD) is associated with adverse events and financial liability. As institutions continue to adopt CDAD rates as a quality control metric, it is important to identify patients at risk before surgery, including revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). This study was conducted to (1) determine the incidence of CDAD within 30 days of rTKA and (2) identify perioperative risk factors for CDAD following rTKA. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify 6023 rTKA procedures from 2015-2016. Preoperative and perioperative variables, including patient demographics, lab values, comorbidities, operative time, procedure type, presence of postoperative infections, and rates of CDAD were collected. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to detect differences between categorical variables, and t-tests were used to compare continuous variables. A stepwise logistic regression model was used to identify the risk factors for CDAD. Results The rate of CDAD within 30 days of rTKA was found to be 0.4% (24/6024). The CDAD rate following aseptic revision was 0.2% (12/4893), while the incidence of CDAD after septic revision was 1.1% (12/1130). Preoperative functional dependence (odds ratio [OR] = 5.14; P = .002), septic revision (OR = 2.77; P = .026), and cancer (OR = 14.26; P = .016) were statistically significant independent risk factors for CDAD after rTKA. Conclusion The incidence of CDAD after rTKA is approximately 0.4% in the United States. Independent risk factors for CDAD include septic revision, preoperative functional dependence, and cancer. Prevention of CDAD in these higher risk patients must be considered before surgery and antibiotic selection for other infections should be managed judiciously.

Background Highly porous metaphyseal cones have been introduced to restore metaphyseal integrity for improved cement interdigitation to achieve durable fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to review the survivorship, clinical results, and complications of revision TKA using highly porous 3-dimensionally printed titanium metaphyseal cones. Methods This is a review of 62 revision TKAs using metaphyseal tibial cones, with 15 cases utilizing both tibial and femoral cones. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (range 32-84) who had a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 24-34). There were 38 women and 24 men, who had a mean body mass index of 33 (range 18.3-62). Results Revision-free survival of the cones was 90.2%. If infection was excluded, survivorship was 100%. There were no cases of aseptic loosening. The mean Knee Society Score improved from 51 points preoperatively to 80 points at the time of latest follow-up. The mean Knee Society Functional Score improved from 48 points preoperatively to 68 points. A total of 15 of the 62 patients (24%) required additional surgery: 10 (16%) for infection, 3 (5%) for contracture, 1 for patellar subluxation, and 1 for quadriceps tendon rupture. Conclusion Metaphyseal fixation is important for survivorship in revision TKA which can be challenging due to cancellous and structural bone loss encountered at the time of revision. Prosthetic joint infection continues to be the leading cause of failure in revision TKA. The use of highly porous titanium metaphyseal cones produced from 3-dimensionally printed technology used in this study demonstrated excellent short-term results with no cases of aseptic loosening. Further follow-up is required to determine if these results can be durable over a longer period.

Background The purpose of this study is to (1) characterize the most common reasons of medical malpractice litigation against adult reconstruction surgeons and (2) report on the outcomes of these lawsuits. Methods The Westlaw legal research database was queried for cases between 2008 and 2018 related to total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) in the United States. Causes of the lawsuit, patient characteristics, demographics, state/outcome of verdict or settlement, and indemnity payments were noted. Results A total of 148 records (81 females [55%], 67 males [45%]; 83 TKAs [56%], 65 THAs [44%]) were included in the final analysis. For all patients, infection was the leading cause for malpractice litigation (22%) followed by nerve injury (20%). For TKA, infection was the most common cause of lawsuit (33%). In THA cases, nerve injury was the most common reason for lawsuit (38%), followed by leg-length discrepancy (26%). Procedural errors were alleged in 72% of cases, while diagnostic and post-surgical errors were cited in 55% and 32% of cases. A defense verdict occurred in 74% of cases, plaintiff verdict in 21%, and parties settled in 5%. Conclusion Infection and nerve injury were the most common reasons for litigation in TKA and THA, respectively. The most likely outcome of these lawsuits was a jury verdict in favor of the surgeon. Regardless, surgeons should be cognizant of the potential for lawsuit due to these complications and should ensure they inform patients of these potential complications of TJA preoperatively.

There is growing evidence that cemented femoral stems have lower complication rates in the elderly due to lower rates of periprosthetic fracture. The main objective of this study was to analyze the survival rate of a hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA) construct utilizing a taper-slip femoral stem implanted through the anterior approach (AA). Secondary outcome measures were the complication rate, the rate of aseptic loosening, coronal plane alignment of the stem, and the grade of the cement mantle.Patients who underwent AA hybrid THA from 2013 to 2020 were included. Indications for a cemented stem were age over 70 or patients with poor bone quality. Descriptive statistics were calculated for patient characteristics. Serial radiographs were reviewed for component alignment and for evidence of implant loosening. The survival of the femoral stem was recorded, with failure defined as femoral stem revision for any reason or radiographic evidence of implant loosening.A total of 473 hybrid THA in 426 patients were identified, with a mean age of 76 years. Mean follow-up was 38 months. Femoral stem survival was 99.2%. There were no cases of aseptic loosening of the femoral component. Mean coronal stem alignment was 0.2 degrees varus, and all were within 5 degrees of neutral. Cement mantle grade was either A or B in 94% of cases.AA hybrid THA is an excellent option in elderly patients, or patients with poor bone quality, with a femoral stem survival rate of 99.2% and a 0% rate of aseptic loosening.

Background As volumes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to rise, it is important to understand their economic impact. No systematic review on cost-effectiveness of THA/TKA has been performed since 2016 despite recent changes in the healthcare environment. The purpose of the study is to provide a contemporary analysis of the cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty and the use of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Methods A systematic review was performed from 2005 to 2020. Online databases (OVID Medline, PubMed, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, Google Scholar, Elton B. Stephens Co) were queried to identify economic analyses that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of THA/TKA. Results In total, 38 studies met the screening criteria. Study designs were primarily Markov models (68%), cohort studies (16%), and randomized trials (8%). Most studies adopted either a societal perspective (45%) or a health system perspective (39%). Analysis revealed that THA/TKA was strongly cost-effective compared to nonsurgical treatment. THA/TKA procedures that were not delayed were more cost-effective than delayed intervention. The majority of studies used QALYs as the primary quality metric (82%); in all these studies there was a significant improvement in QALYs gained. Conclusion Given the high economic impact of arthroplasty, ongoing assessment of cost-effectiveness is needed. Twenty-four percent of studies included in this systematic review were published in the last 4 years of this 15-year study period, highlighting the need for continuous assessment of aggregate data. Future studies should incorporate the cost-effectiveness of THA and TKA with respect to the work-value provided by surgeon providers to support health policy and reimbursement.

Background Patient-reported outcome metrics and reporting are important for demonstrating value associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This review studied the patient-reported outcome utilization trends as reported within the TKA literature over a 15-year period. Methods A PubMed search of all manuscripts related to TKA from January 2005 to December 2019 was performed. Descriptive statistics were used for individual outcome metrics as proportions of total article publications focusing on TKA outcomes. Linear regressions analysis was performed to demonstrate significant changes in utilization rates over time. Results There was a significant overall increase in studies utilizing outcome metrics between 2005 and 2019 (16.1%-45.0%; P Conclusion Although utilization of outcome metrics has significantly increased over the last 15 years in the TKA literature, there still exists considerable heterogeneity of outcome metrics. This lack of consensus may impede comparisons of studies for clinical and research purposes, as well as hinder cross-walk of outcome tools over time. Further study is needed to identify ideal global and joint-specific tools, while balancing issues like ease of use and utility in specific populations such as the young and highly active.

Background In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, US hospitals have canceled elective surgeries. This decline in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) revenue may place financial strain on hospitals. Our goal was to quantify the impact of COVID-19 on the public interest in elective TJA. Methods The Google Search Volume Index (GSVI) identified the terms “knee replacement,” “hip replacement,” and “orthopedic surgeon” as the most common to describe TJA. The term “elective surgery cancellation” was also analyzed. Weekly GSVI data were extracted between 04-01-2015 and 04-04-2020. Time series analysis was conducted and state GSVI values were compared with COVID-19 prevalence and unemployment claims. Results The relative public interest in elective TJA has sharply declined since the WHO declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Between 03-01-2020 and 03-29-2020, the popularity of searches for “knee replacement”, “hip replacement,” and “orthopedic surgeon” dropped by 62.1%, 52.1%, and 44.3%, respectively. A concurrent spike was observed for the term “elective surgery cancellation.” California, New Hampshire, Maine, and Nevada showed a low relative rate for TJA searches, and the highest increase in unemployment claims. Conclusion The onset of COVID-19 correlates with declining relative popularity of searches related to elective TJA. Higher volume of COVID-19 cases in certain states may correspond with lower relative search popularity, although this correlation remains unclear. These results portend the possibility of a decline in elective TJA case volume, further straining hospitals. Further research is required to inform stakeholders how best to proceed and determine any sustained effects from the current diminished relative interest in TJA. Level of Evidence Level III.

BACKGROUND With the recent reevaluation of surgeon reimbursement for total hip arthroplasty (THA) by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, there is increasing need for information regarding trends in operative time. While single-institutional analyses exist, there is a lack of large-scale, nationally representative, multi-institutional data. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to (1) evaluate past/present operative time trends for THA and (2) investigate factors influencing operative times from a 10-year, large multi-institutional database. METHODS All primary THAs conducted between 2008 and 2018 were queried using Current Procedural Terminology code 27130 from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, yielding 157,574 patients. Operative time, demographics, and comorbidity data were collected and analyzed. Multivariable linear models were created, and trend analyses were used where appropriate. RESULTS Median operative time was 87 minutes. Operative time was stable across included study years, with all calculated values within 5 minutes of the median (range, 86-92 minutes). Operative time was statistically stable over the last 3 years (P = .121). Age, body mass index, resident involvement, modified Charlson comorbidity index, and preoperative laboratory values influenced operative time (P < .001). Length of stay, readmission, superficial wound infection, and sepsis decreased over the study period. Nonelective procedures were statistically longer than elective (P < .0001). CONCLUSION While numerous factors influence the duration of THA, this study found that THA operative time has remained stable in recent years. Therefore, revaluation for THA based on intraservice time is not supported. Future analyses should continue to analyze factors that influence operative time in order to ensure patient safety and maintain positive outcomes.

Introduction Changes in reimbursement in total knee arthroplasty by CMS has been tied to a perceived decrease in the total surgical time required to perform these operations. However, little information is available to CMS or the AMA about recorded surgical times for TKA across the United States and the variables that drive these values. Such objective data would be a useful reference for policy makers interested in evaluating physician reimbursement, particularly if paired to contemporary data on the clinical results associated with observed trends in surgical times. Therefore, the purpose of our study, using a large national database, was to evaluate 1) changes in operative time over time and 2) factors associated with variations in operative time. Methods The NSQIP database was queried to identify all primary TKAs conducted between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2017. We included all TKAs conducted within our study period that had operative time data available. Multivariable linear models were created to assess factors that influence operative time over the study period. Outcome trends across years were assessed using either linear models or Cochran-Armitage test for trend analyses. Results After applying pre-determined exclusion criteria, a total of 140,890 TKAs were included in our final analysis (61.9% female, mean age (±SD): 49.83 ± 9.52 years). The mean operative time across the study period was found to be 92.60 minutes. Examining quarterly values, operative time stayed within 5 minutes of this mean (range: 89.80 to 97.51 minutes). Multivariable analysis identified various factors including age, sex, functional status, anesthesia type, body mass index, operative year, transfusion requirements, and preoperative laboratory findings as being significant influencers of operative time (p Discussion With a recent call for an additional TKA procedural code valuation by CMS, current information regarding factors influencing operative time and clinical outcome trends related to TKA procedures remains essential. Our analysis indicates that, while there are numerous factors that influence procedure duration, operative times have remained stable. This information should be heavily considered in regard to physician reimbursement, since providers are maintaining operative times and work effort while mitigating factors that influence outcomes in the peri-operative period.

Background The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) continues to be a subject of extensive debate. This is in part due to the lack of a single “gold standard” test, and the marked heterogeneity in the design of studies evaluating the accuracy of different diagnostic modalities. The goal of this review is to critically analyze the evidence cited by the proceedings of the 2013 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) on PJI with regards to the diagnosis of PJI. Methods References from the Proceedings of the ICM on PJI related to PJI minor criteria were retrieved and manually reviewed. A total of 25 studies were analyzed using a Validated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Results A large number of studies were determined to have a high risk of bias for flow and timing domains due to the large numbers of exclusions. Studies of synovial white blood cells count and polymorphonuclear neutrophils percentage suffered from threshold optimization and lack of internal validity. Furthermore, due to the lack of homogeneity across studies, index test and reference standard domains showed high risk of bias for white blood cell/polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage and the utility histological analysis, respectively. Leukocyte esterase testing lacked standardization with regard to the strip reagent used, and the exclusion of bloody samples limited sample sizes. Conclusion The 2013 ICM minor criteria were based on studies with a low quality of evidence. As the committee continues to adjust these guidelines, they should encourage future studies with sound clinical design, patient selection, and testing procedures.

It has been established by previous studies that longer operative times can lead to higher rates of complications and poorer outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, these studies were heterogeneous, examined limited complications, and have not provided a clear time after which complications increase. The aims of this study were to (1) assess whether longer operative time increases risk of complications within 30 days of THA, (2) investigate the relationship between operative time and various complications after THA, and (3) identify possible operative times beyond which complication rates increase.The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried to identify 89,802 procedures that were included in the final analysis. The effect of operative time on complications within 30 days was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models. Spline regression models were created to investigate the relationship between operative time and complications.Longer operative times were associated with higher risk of readmissions (P.001), reoperations (P.001), surgical site infection (P.001), wound dehiscence (P.001), renal or systemic complications (P.001), and blood transfusion (P.001). A linear relationship was observed between operative time and readmission, reoperation, surgical site infection, and transfusions with increased rate of these complications when the operative time exceeded 75 to 80 minutes. Venous thromboembolic complications had a U-shaped relationship with operative time with the trough around 90 to 100 minutes.While our findings cannot establish a clear cause and effect relation, they do suggest strong correlation between increased operative time and perioperative complications. Additionally, this study suggests an optimal time of approximately 80 minutes, as a goal for surgeons, that may be associated with less risk of complications following THA.

Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are commonly used for the diagnosis of persistence of infection after the first stage of 2-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). As both ESR and CRP are markers of systemic inflammation, the utility of these tests to monitor infection clearance in patients with inflammatory arthritis is unclear.From 2001 to 2016, 44 two-stage revision total hip or knee arthroplasties in patients with an inflammatory arthritis diagnosed by a rheumatologist were identified. Persistence of infection at the time of planned second stage was defined as satisfying the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI (14 infected, 30 noninfected). ESR and CRP values were compared between the stages using nonparametric tests. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to obtain the diagnostic parameters.ESR and CRP decreased between the stages in the noninfected group (ESR: mean decrease = 31.6 mm/h [19.2-44.0], P.001; CRP: mean decrease = 5.2 mg/dL [2.1-8.2], P.001), but remained elevated in the infected group (ESR: mean decrease = 7.7 [-23.1 to 36.6], P = .572; CRP: mean decrease = 1.5 [-2.2 to 5.1], P = .258). Optimal thresholds for persistent infection were 29.5 mm/h and 2.8 mg/dL, respectively, for ESR and CRP. The sensitivity and specificity at the optimal thresholds were 64% and 77% for ESR, and 64% and 90% for CRP.ESR and CRP responded to the treatment of PJI in patients with inflammatory arthritis and had reasonably high specificities with moderate sensitivities. ESR and CRP appear to be useful tools in diagnosing persistent infection even in patients with inflammatory arthritis.