Search

Objectives To describe plasma residual HIV viraemia, cellular HIV reservoir size, blood plasma drug concentrations and their male genital tract penetration during the maintenance dual therapy dolutegravir + lamivudine. Patients and methods ANRS167 LAMIDOL enrolled 104 virologically suppressed patients to switch to dolutegravir + lamivudine. In this pharmacovirological substudy, ultrasensitive plasma viral load (USpVL) and plasma drug concentrations were measured at Day 0 (D0), Week 24 (W24) and W48 of dolutegravir + lamivudine, and HIV-DNA was measured at W−8 and W48. Semen samples were collected at D0 and W24 from 18 participants. Total and unbound blood and seminal plasma drug concentrations were measured using UPLC–MS/MS. Results Median HIV-DNA was 2.5 log10 copies/106 PBMC (IQR = 2.2–3.0, n = 100) at W−8 and 2.4 log10 copies/106 PBMC (IQR = 2.1–2.9, n = 100) at W48 (P = 0.17). The proportion of patients with undetected USpVL was 38% (n = 98), 43% (n = 98) and 49% (n = 97) at D0, W24 and W48, respectively (P = 0.08). Total and unbound plasma dolutegravir concentrations were stable between timepoints (P = 0.13) and all total plasma dolutegravir concentrations except one were adequate. Median free fraction of dolutegravir in plasma was 0.21%. Median blood plasma and seminal plasma concentrations of total dolutegravir at 24 h were 1812 ng/mL and 206 ng/mL, respectively. Median seminal plasma/blood plasma total concentration ratios were 11.6% and 2478% for dolutegravir and lamivudine, respectively. HIV-RNA (365 to 475 copies/mL) was detected in seminal plasma of one patient at D0 (5.9%) and of two patients at W24 (11.8%). Conclusions These findings add further important information regarding the effectiveness of dolutegravir + lamivudine maintenance dual therapy in terms of plasma residual viraemia, cellular reservoir size and drug penetration in the male genital tract.

International audience; OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the dolutegravir+lamivudine combination in virologically suppressed patients living with HIV.METHODS:The ANRS 167 LAMIDOL trial was an open-label, single arm, multicentre trial assessing once-daily dolutegravir (50 mg)+lamivudine (300 mg) in virologically suppressed HIV-1 patients on first-line triple-drug regimens. The main criteria for inclusion in the trial were plasma viral load (pVL) ≤50 copies/mL for ≥2 years, CD4 nadir >200 cells/mm3 and WT HIV prior to treatment initiation. From week -8 (W-8) to day 0 (D0) (Phase 1), the current third agent was switched to dolutegravir. From D0 to W48 (Phase 2), patients received once-daily dolutegravir+lamivudine, except if intolerant or if pVL >50 copies/mL during Phase 1. Virological failure was defined as pVL >50 copies/mL in two consecutive samples. The study was designed to show that the strategy had an efficacy of ≥80%, assuming a 90% success rate with a type I error of 5% and a power of 90%.RESULTS:In total, 104 of 110 patients enrolled in Phase 1 were included in Phase 2. These 104 patients were 86% male, 72% MSM and 87% CDC stage A. Their characteristics were (median): age 45 years, CD4 nadir 339 cells/mm3, baseline CD4 743 cells/mm3 and duration of viral suppression 4.5 years. The overall success rate at W48 was 97% (95% CI: 94%-100%), meeting the design expectation/assumption. Three therapeutic failures occurred: one virological failure at W4, one lost to follow-up at W32 and one interruption of therapeutic strategy at W40 after a blip (pVL 59 copies/mL but control pVL

OBJECTIVES Quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli (QREC) primarily emerge in commensal bacteria under selective pressure. The aim of this work was to investigate the characteristics of QREC from the faecal microbiota after quinolone exposure, as they remain largely unknown. METHODS Forty-eight healthy volunteers received ciprofloxacin from day 1 to day 14. QREC were detected in stools from 14 subjects at day 42. QREC were compared in terms of genetic background, metabolic properties, stress resistance and intestinal colonization abilities with quinolone-susceptible E. coli (QSEC) from the same 14 individuals and from 29 volunteers who remained QREC-free. RESULTS QREC always belonged to a single clone for a given volunteer and to restricted phylogenetic groups. QREC carried significantly more iron capture systems than QSEC. Maximum growth rates in minimal medium with gluconate, general stress regulator RpoS activity assessed by iodine staining and resistance to oxidative and acid stresses were significantly higher for QREC than for QSEC. In a mouse colonization model, QREC efficiently colonized the intestine microbiota despite the presence of QSEC competitors. At day 42, QREC and QSEC faecal counts from the 14 volunteers were comparable except in three subjects where only QREC could be detected. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that QREC do not have a fitness cost, probably as a result of genetic co-selection, but are highly adapted to a commensal lifestyle. They may not be eliminated easily from the faecal microbiota from healthy subjects once selected.