Search

Severe asthma accounts for almost half the cost associated with asthma. Severe asthma is driven by heterogeneous molecular mechanisms. Conventional clinical trial design often lacks the power and efficiency to target subgroups with specific pathobiological mechanisms. Furthermore, the validation and approval of new asthma therapies is a lengthy process. Alarge proportion of that time is taken by clinical trials to validate asthma interventions. The National Institutes of Health Precision Medicine in Severe and/or Exacerbation Prone Asthma (PrecISE) program was established with the goal of designing and executing a trial that uses adaptive design techniques to rapidly evaluate novel interventions in biomarker-defined subgroups of severe asthma, while seeking to refine these biomarker subgroups, and to identify early markers of response to therapy. The novel trial design is an adaptive platform trial conducted under a single master protocol that incorporates precision medicine components. Furthermore, it includes innovative applications of futility analysis, cross-over design with use of shared placebo groups, and early futility analysis to permit more rapid identification of effective interventions. The development and rationale behind the study design are described. The interventions chosen for the initial investigation and the criteria used to identify these interventions are enumerated. The biomarker-based adaptive design and analytic scheme are detailed as well as special considerations involved in the final trial design.

Combination of IL-6 (non-Type 2 asthma) and FeNO or blood eosinophil count (Type 2 asthma) identified asthma endotypes related to asthma severity, exacerbations, and responsiveness to corticosteroids and potential for response to anti-Type 2 and anti-IL-6 treatment.

Background Tools for quantification of asthma severity are limited. Objective We sought to develop a continuous measure of asthma severity, the Asthma Severity Scoring System (ASSESS), for adolescents and adults, incorporating domains of asthma control, lung function, medications, and exacerbations. Methods Baseline and 36-month longitudinal data from participants in phase 3 of the Severe Asthma Research Program (NCT01606826) were used. Scale properties, responsiveness, and a minimally important difference were determined. External replication was performed in participants enrolled in the Severe Asthma Research Program phase 1/2. The utility of ASSESS for detecting treatment response was explored in participants undergoing corticosteroid responsiveness testing with intramuscular triamcinolone and participants receiving biologics. Results ASSESS scores ranged from 0 to 20 (8.78 ± 3.9; greater scores reflect worse severity) and differed among 5 phenotypic groups. Measurement properties were acceptable. ASSESS was responsive to changes in quality of life with a minimally important difference of 2, with good specificity for outcomes of asthma improvement and worsening but poor sensitivity. Replication analyses yielded similar results, with a 2-point decrease (improvement) associated with improvements in quality of life. Participants with a 2-point or greater decrease (improvement) in ASSESS scores also had greater improvement in lung function and asthma control after triamcinolone, but these differences were limited to phenotypic clusters 3, 4, and 5. Participants treated with biologics also had a 2-point or greater decrease (improvement) in ASSESS scores overall. Conclusions The ASSESS tool is an objective measure that might be useful in epidemiologic and clinical research studies for quantification of treatment response in individual patients and phenotypic groups. However, validation studies are warranted.

Background Airway type 2 inflammation is usually corticosteroid sensitive, but the role of type 2 inflammation as a mechanism of asthma in patients receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) is uncertain. Objective We sought to determine whether airway type 2 inflammation persists in patients treated with ICSs and to evaluate the clinical features of patients with steroid-resistant airway type 2 inflammation. Methods We used quantitative PCR to generate a composite metric of type 2 cytokine gene expression (type 2 gene mean [T2GM]) in induced sputum cells from healthy control subjects, patients with severe asthma receiving ICSs (n = 174), and patients with nonsevere asthma receiving ICSs (n = 85). We explored relationships between asthma outcomes and T2GM values and the utility of noninvasive biomarkers of airway T2GM. Results Sputum cell T2GM values in asthmatic patients were significantly increased and remained high after treatment with intramuscular triamcinolone. We used the median T2GM value as a cutoff to classify steroid-treated type 2–low and steroid-resistant type 2–high (srT2-high) subgroups. Compared with patients with steroid-treated type 2–low asthma, those with srT2-high asthma were older and had more severe asthma. Blood eosinophil cell counts predicted srT2-high asthma when body mass index was less than 40 kg/m 2 but not when it was 40 kg/m 2 or greater, whereas blood IgE levels strongly predicted srT2-high asthma when age was less than 34 years but not when it was 34 years or greater. Conclusion Despite ICS therapy, many asthmatic patients have persistent airway type 2 inflammation (srT2-high asthma), and these patients are older and have more severe disease. Body weight and age modify the performance of blood-based biomarkers of airway type 2 inflammation.

Background Previously, we found that mast cell tryptases and carboxypeptidase A3 (CPA3) are differentially expressed in the airway epithelium in asthmatic subjects. We also found that asthmatic subjects can be divided into 2 subgroups ("T H 2 high" and "T H 2 low" asthma) based on epithelial cell gene signatures for the activity of T H 2 cytokines. Objectives We sought to characterize intraepithelial mast cells (IEMCs) in asthma. Methods We performed gene expression profiling in epithelial brushings and stereology-based quantification of mast cell numbers in endobronchial biopsy specimens from healthy control and asthmatic subjects before and after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). We also performed gene expression and protein quantification studies in cultured airway epithelial cells and mast cells. Results By means of unsupervised clustering, mast cell gene expression in the airway epithelium related closely to the expression of IL-13 signature genes. The levels of expression of mast cell genes correlate positively with lung function improvements with ICSs. IEMC density was 2-fold higher than normal in subjects with T H 2-high asthma compared with that seen in subjects with T H 2-low asthma or healthy control subjects ( P = .015 for both comparisons), and these cells were characterized by expression of tryptases and CPA3 but not chymase. IL-13 induced expression of stem cell factor in cultured airway epithelial cells, and mast cells exposed to conditioned media from IL-13–activated epithelial cells showed downregulation of chymase but no change in tryptase or CPA3 expression. Conclusion IEMC numbers are increased in subjects with T H 2-high asthma, have an unusual protease phenotype (tryptase and CPA3 high and chymase low), and predict responsiveness to ICSs. IL-13–stimulated production of stem cell factor by epithelial cells potentially explains mast cell accumulation in T H 2-high asthmatic epithelium.

Background: Chitinolytic enzymes play important roles in the pathophysiology of allergic airway responses in mouse models of asthma. Acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) and chitotriosidase (CHIT1) have chitinolytic activity, but relatively little is known about their expression in human asthma. Objective: We sought to determine the expression and activity of AMCase and CHIT1 in healthy subjects, subjects with asthma, and habitual smokers, taking account of the null 24-bp duplication in the CHIT1 gene. Methods: We measured chitinase activity in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid at multiple pHs by using a synthetic chitin substrate. We also determined AMCase and CHIT1 gene expression in epithelial brushings and BAL fluid macrophages by means of real time RT-PCR. Paired DNA samples were genotyped for the CHIT1 duplication. Results: In all subgroups the pH profile of chitinase activity in BAL fluid matched that of CHIT1, but not AMCase, and chitinase activity was absent in subjects genetically deficient in active CHIT1. Although AMCase protein was detectable in lavage fluid, AMCase transcripts in macrophages were consistent with an isoform lacking enzymatic activity. Median chitinase activity in BAL fluid tended to be lower than normal in asthmatic subjects but was increased 7-fold in habitual smokers, where CHIT1 gene expression in macrophages was increased. Conclusions: Chitinase activity in the lung is the result of CHIT1 activity. Although AMCase protein is detectable in the lung, our data indicate that it is inactive. Chitinase activity is not increased in subjects with asthma and in fact tends to be decreased. The high levels of chitinase activity in habitual smokers result from upregulation of CHIT1 gene expression, especially in macrophages. Q Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;122:944-50.)

Omalizumab is an mAb that binds free IgE and ultimately reduces the density of IgE-loaded receptors on IgE effector cells. Because IgE effector cells, such as mast cells and basophils, are a source of proinflammatory chemokines, cytokines, and proteases, it is not surprising that omalizumab has anti-inflammatory effects, most notably large effects in reducing airway eosinophilia. What has been surprising is the nature of the clinical effects of omalizumab. Rates of exacerbation in omalizumab-treated patients are approximately half those in placebo-treated patients. This important clinical effect has occurred despite the fact that omalizumab does not improve nonspecific bronchial hyperesponsiveness and does not have large effects on airflow. The unsuspected dissociations among asthma outcomes uncovered during clinical trials of omalizumab remind us that mysteries remain for how inflammation, remodeling, and airway function are linked in asthma.

Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are effective in preventing deterioration in asthma control, at least half of subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma will remain stable when these agents are discontinued.We sought to determine whether noninvasive markers of inflammation predict which individuals maintain asthma control after discontinuation of ICSs.We analyzed data obtained from 164 subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma who participated in a 16-week trial comparing the effects of continued ICS use with the effects of a switch to salmeterol or placebo.In comparison with continued ICS use, a switch to salmeterol or placebo was associated with increased rates of asthma deterioration over 16 weeks (9.3% vs 24.1% and 37.5%, respectively; P = .04 and P.001, respectively). We found that neither exhaled nitric oxide nor methacholine PC 20 , when measured at randomization or 2 weeks after randomization, were significant predictors of subsequent asthma control in subjects who discontinued ICSs. However, both induced sputum eosinophil counts measured 2 weeks after a switch from ICS to placebo and changes in sputum eosinophil counts from before cessation of ICSs to after a switch to placebo predicted subsequent asthma deterioration (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.771 [ P.001] and 0.825 [ P.001], respectively).On the basis of a model treatment strategy, we estimate that allocating subjects to ICS therapy on the basis of changes in sputum eosinophil counts after a trial discontinuation could allow 48% of subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma to discontinue ICS therapy without an increased risk of asthma deterioration over a period of at least 14 weeks.

To determine whether induced sputum samples might provide a useful means for evaluating the effects of therapy on airway mucosal inflammation, we examined induced sputum samples obtained before and after 6 days of treatment with prednisone (0.5 mg/kg/day) or placebo in a randomized, double-blind study of 24 asthmatic subjects. Induced sputum was analyzed for total and differential cell counts and for concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein, albumin, and mucin-like glycoprotein. We found that the mean (+/- SEM) percentage of eosinophils in sputum samples from the prednisone-treated group fell from 14.1% +/- 5.0% at baseline to 1.8% +/- 0.8% after treatment, a decrease significantly greater than in the placebo-treated group (from 10.3% +/- 4.9% to 11.1% +/- 4.0%; p = 0.002). The absolute number of eosinophils also decreased significantly more in the prednisone-treated group than in the placebo-treated group (p = 0.04). In addition, eosinophil cationic protein levels in induced sputum fell more in the prednisone-treated group than in the placebo-treated group (from 324 +/- 131 ng/ml to 144 +/- 84 ng/ml vs 173 +/- 50 ng/ml to 188 +/- 47 ng/ml; p = 0.002). Furthermore, prednisone treatment was associated with a significant increase in peak expiratory flow, an effect that was significantly correlated with the decrease in eosinophil percentage in induced sputum (rs = 0.64, p = 0.04). Prednisone treatment was not associated with any significant change in the concentrations of albumin or mucin-like glycoprotein. We conclude that analysis of induced sputum is a useful noninvasive method for studying the effects of asthma therapy on airway eosinophilic inflammation.

To determine whether analysis of the constituents of induced sputum permits detection of changes provoked by aerosolized antigen challenge, we performed sputum induction (20-minute inhalation of aerosolized 3% saline solution) before and after aerosolized allergen challenge in eight subjects with asthma. Total cell counts and cell differentials of nonsquamous cells in induced sputum samples were determined after the samples were homogenized in dithiothreitol. Centrifugation of the entire homogenized sputum sample yielded supernatant that could be analyzed for biochemical constituents. We found that the median percentage of eosinophils and neutrophils in induced sputum samples was significantly higher 4 hours after allergen challenge neutrophils in induced sputum samples was significantly higher 4 hours after allergen challenge than at baseline (12% vs 0.5%, p < 0.05; 30.5% vs 7.5%, p < 0.05) and remained high 24 hours after challenge. Median levels of eosinophil cationic protein and histamine in induced sputum supernatants were significantly higher 4 hours after challenge than at baseline (151.3 vs 39.8 ng/ml, p < 0.05; 19.4 vs 8.8 micrograms, p < 0.05) and remained significantly higher 24 hours after challenge. Tryptase was detectable in sputum from seven of the subjects, and in these subjects, we found a trend toward an increase in median tryptase levels 4 hours after allergen challenge (4.4 vs 2.2 U/L, p = 0.09). We conclude that analysis of induced sputum after aerosolized allergen challenge reveals changes in inflammatory cells and markers similar to those reported in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and that sputum induction is a useful noninvasive method for studying allergic airway inflammation in asthma.