1. Extrathoracic and transthoracic management of vascular disease of the aortic arch branches: A 16-year experience
- Author
-
Richard D. Schultz, Antonio V. Sterpetti, Farina C, Kathy Davenport, and Richard J. Feldhaus
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Aortic arch ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Arteriosclerosis ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Revascularization ,Postoperative Complications ,Risk Factors ,Blood vessel prosthesis ,Cause of Death ,medicine.artery ,medicine ,Humans ,Common carotid artery ,Stroke ,Vascular Patency ,Subclavian artery ,Aged ,business.industry ,Vascular disease ,Thoracic Surgery ,Blood Vessel Prosthesis ,Female ,Follow-Up Studies ,Length of Stay ,Middle Aged ,Takayasu Arteritis ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Cardiothoracic surgery ,Radiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
To determine factors influencing results of operation for proximal brachiocephalic arterial disease, a 16-year review of 74 consecutive patients was undertaken. A total of 62 subclavian, 14 common carotid, 6 innominate, and 2 vertebral arteries were revascularized during 79 procedures. The approach was transthoracic in 12 operations and extrathoracic in 67. Mean follow-up was 57 +/- 45 months. Two patients (2.5%) died of stroke after extrathoracic revascularization of the common carotid artery. Cumulative 5-year and 10-year freedom from neurological events was 81% and 75%, respectively. The best results were obtained with transthoracic procedures, with revascularization of the subclavian artery rather than the common carotid artery, and in operations performed in patients without associated distal carotid disease. In view of the recent progress in operative techniques and postoperative surgical care, the choice between the transthoracic approach and the extrathoracic approach should not be biased; rather, they should remain equal and viable alternatives based on anatomical and clinical features of the individual patients.
- Published
- 1989
- Full Text
- View/download PDF