Search

Objective: To determine the rate of surgical complications, unplanned readmission, and functional status after open hypopharyngeal surgery for dysphagia with early return to oral diet and hospital discharge. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open hypopharyngeal surgery for management of dysphagia from March 2013 to June 2018 at a single academic institution. A clear liquid diet is restarted the day of surgery and is advanced to a soft diet on postoperative day one. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and unplanned readmission. Results: Ninety patients met eligibility criteria; 62 patients underwent open cricopharyngeal myotomy, 13 underwent Zenker’s diverticulectomy, 15 had a Zenker’s diverticulopexy. Mean inpatient length of stay was 2.0 ± 2.0 days (range 0-11 days); 57 patients (63.3%) were discharged on the same day as surgery or on postoperative day one. Seven patients (7.8%) had postoperative complications; the most common complication was esophageal leak (n = 6). Six patients (6.7%) had unplanned readmissions within 30 days. Mean time to unplanned readmission was 12 days (range 2-19 days). Open diverticulectomy was associated with an increased risk of unplanned readmission with an OR = 7.63 (95% CI 1.29, 45.45, P = .025). At last follow-up, 70% of patients had an increased functional oral intake by at least one scale score (FOIS) after surgery (mean follow-up 0.8 ± 1.1 years, range 0.02-5.1 years). Conclusion: An early diet and discharge may be safe for patients undergoing open surgery without a mechanical or suture closure of their esophageal mucosa, whereas in those undergoing diverticulectomy, NPO status and a radiological check before resuming drinking and eating are advised. Level of Evidence: 4

Objective: To evaluate treatment outcomes of upper airway stimulation (UAS) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients based on patient age, gender, and preoperative disease severity. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing UAS from 2014 to 2018 at a tertiary care center. Data collected included demographic information, implantation records, and pre- and postoperative polysomnography (PSG) results. Profound OSA was defined as AHI >65 and age ≥65 was considered advanced age. The primary outcome measured was initial treatment response, defined as a post-operative AHI 50% reduction from baseline. Results: 145 patients underwent UAS at our institution including 98 males and 47 females with a mean age of 61.7 ± 11.5 years, mean BMI of 29.1 ± 3.9 kg/m2, and mean preoperative AHI of 34.1 ± 18.2 events/hour. After surgery, patients had a significantly lower mean AHI of 8.6 ± 15.0 events/hour (Conclusion: Although the overall OSA population showed significant postoperative AHI reduction with UAS, patients age ≥65 years were less likely to have an initial response to treatment, when compared to their younger counterparts. A larger proportion of elderly patients and patients with profound OSA had residual moderate disease (AHI > 15) after UAS. Level of Evidence: 4

Objective: To understand differences in patient demographics, insurance-related treatment delays, and average waiting times for Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Retrospective chart review of all Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) from 2015 to 2018 at a single academic center. Primary outcomes were insurance-related procedure cancellation rate and time from drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery in Medicare versus private insurance patients. Results: In our cohort 207 underwent DISE and were recommended treatment with UAS. Forty-four patients with Medicare and 30 patients with private insurance underwent UAS procedure. Patients with Medicare undergoing UAS were older (67.4 ± 11.1 years) than patients with private insurance (54.9 ± 8.1 years). Medicare patients had a shorter mean wait time of 121.9 ± 75.8 days (range, 15-331 days) from the time of UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery when compared to patients with private insurance (201.3 ± 102.2 days; range, 33-477 days). Three patients with Medicare (6.4%) and 8 patients with private insurance (21.1%) were ultimately denied UAS. Conclusion: Medicare patients undergoing UAS have shorter waiting periods, fewer insurance-related treatment delays and may experience fewer procedure cancellations when compared to patients with private insurance. The investigational status of UAS by private insurance companies delays care for patients with OSA. Level of Evidence: 4