Search

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) have a substantial risk of subsequent coronary events within 1 year. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence, long-term outcomes, and adherence to oral antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS and nonobstructive CAD compared with patients with ACS and obstructive CAD who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Nonobstructive CAD was defined as an angiographic finding of50% diameter stenosis in any major epicardial artery. These patients were further stratified into 2 groups: those with normal coronary arteries (0% angiographic stenosis) and those with mild CAD (0% to 50% angiographic stenosis). Major adverse cardiac events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, ACS leading to hospitalization, and nonfatal stroke, were recorded and compared with a historical control group of patients with ACS and obstructive CAD who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Of 2,438 consecutive patients with ACS undergoing coronary angiography, 318 (13%) had nonobstructive CAD. Of the 318 with nonobstructive CAD, 160 had normal coronary arteries and 158 had mild CAD. Patients with obstructive CAD had experienced greater rates of major adverse cardiac events at 26 ± 16 months (16.6% vs 9.1%, p = 0.001), driven by a greater rate of myocardial infarction compared with those without (5.3% vs 0%, p0.001). However, the rate of death, ACS leading to hospitalization, and stroke was similar. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, no difference was found in the risk of major adverse cardiac events across the groups. Only 50% of patients with nonobstructive CAD were prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy. In conclusion, patients with ACS and nonobstructive CAD remain at high risk of long-term recurrent ischemic events.

Conflicting data have been reported on the effects of low-osmolar and iso-osmolar contrast media on contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). In particular, no clinical trial has yet focused on the effect of contemporary contrast media on CI-AKI, epicardial flow, and microcirculatory function in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Following Coronary Revascularization by Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction (CONTRAST-AMI) trial is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, noninferiority study aiming to evaluate the effects of the low-osmolar contrast medium iopromide compared to the iso-osmolar agent iodixanol on CI-AKI and tissue-level perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Four hundred seventy-five consecutive, unselected patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to iopromide (n = 239) or iodixanol (n = 236). All patients received high-dose N-acetylcysteine and hydration. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with serum creatinine (sCr) increases ≥25% from baseline to 72 hours. Secondary end points were Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion grade, increase in sCr ≥50%, increase in sCr ≥0.5 or ≥1 mg/dl, and 1-month major adverse cardiac events. The primary end point occurred in 10% of the iopromide group and in 13% of the iodixanol group (95% confidence interval -9% to 3%, p for noninferiority = 0.0002). A TIMI myocardial perfusion grade of 0 or 1 was present in 14% of patients in the 2 groups. No differences between the 2 groups were found in any of the secondary analyses of sCr increase. No significant difference in 1-month major adverse cardiac events was found (8% vs 6%, p = 0.37). In conclusion, in a population of unselected patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention, iopromide was not inferior to iodixanol in the occurrence of CI-AKI; no significant differences were found in terms of tissue-level reperfusion and major adverse cardiac events between the 2 contrast agents.

Bivalirudin is widely used as an anticoagulant during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, an increase in acute stent thrombosis rates has been found in the HORIZONS-AMI trial. A prolonged infusion after PCI has been shown to be a safe and effective tool in patients undergoing urgent or elective PCI in the PROBI VIRI study. We examined the effects of prolonged drug infusion after primary PCI. From databases of 5 high-volume centers we compared a group of patients treated with a 4-hour prolonged infusion after PCI to 2 groups treated with a peri-PCI infusion and heparin plus abciximab. The primary study end point was >70% ST-segment resolution within 90 minutes after PCI; secondary end points were partial (>50%) ST-segment resolution within 90 minutes and intrahospital major and minor bleedings on the Acuity scale. The study population consisted of 264 patients undergoing primary PCI who were pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel. The 3 study groups did not differ significantly by baseline characteristics. The primary end point was achieved in 69.8%, 48.8%, and 69.6% of patients in the prolonged bivalirudin, bivalirudin, and heparin/abciximab groups, respectively (p = 0.048 for prolonged vs standard infusion, p = 0.98 for prolonged infusion vs abciximab). Major bleedings and other secondary study end points were not significantly different among study groups. In conclusion, a strategy of prolonged bivalirudin infusion after primary PCI seems equivalent to a strategy with heparin plus abciximab, with an improvement in standard infusion in obtaining early microvascular reperfusion.

Incomplete struts coverage is a predictor of late stent thrombosis after implantation of the drug-eluting stents (DES) in atherosclerotic lesions. The process of struts coverage in DES implanted for bare-metal stent (BMS) restenosis has never been described. Thirty-two patients with stable coronary artery disease were consecutively selected, 11 with BMS restenosis (group A) and 21 with de novo atherosclerotic lesions (group B). All patients underwent everolimus-eluting stent implantation; coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography were performed at 6 months follow-up. Percentage difference in struts coverage between the 2 groups was the primary end point. A total of 85,773 struts (17,891 in group A and 67,882 in group B) were analyzed: compared with group B, the percentage of uncovered stent struts was significantly lower in group A (2.6% vs 4.8%; p

Modern antithrombotic strategies for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) must take into account the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. Bivalirudin decreases the risk of hemorrhagic complications after PCI; however, concerns have been raised about its efficacy in preventing ischemic complications. We evaluated the effectiveness of a prolonged intra- and postprocedural bivalirudin infusion versus a standard regimen in preventing PCI-related myocardial damage. One hundred seventy-eight consecutive patients with stable or unstable angina and complex coronary anatomy were enrolled in this single-center, randomized, single-blinded study. Patients were randomized to bolus plus bivalirudin infusion during PCI (n = 90) or bolus plus bivalirudin infusion during and after PCI (4 hours, n = 88). The primary end point was incidence of periprocedural myocardial damage (creatine kinase-MB increaseor=3 times upper limit of normal). Secondary end points were 30-day and 6-month major adverse cardiovascular events (death, new Q-wave myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) and in-hospital bleeding (major/minor). The 2 groups did not differ significantly in baseline and procedural characteristics. The primary end point of the study was significantly less frequent in the prolonged infusion group (6.8% vs 16.7%, p = 0.041). No significant differences for secondary end points were observed. In conclusion, in patients undergoing complex PCI, a prolonged bivalirudin infusion after PCI compared to an intraprocedural-only regimen significantly decreased the incidence of periprocedural myocardial damage.