1. Potential Clinical Utility and Feasibility of Combined Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Positioning of Miniaturized Pacemaker Through a Single Right Femoral Vein Access
- Author
-
Angelo Auricchio, Giulio Conte, Marco Araco, François Regoli, Maria Luce Caputo, Marco Moccetti, Tiziano Moccetti, University of Zurich, and Regoli, François
- Subjects
Male ,Cardiac Catheterization ,Pacemaker, Artificial ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Septal Occluder Device ,Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional ,Femoral vein ,610 Medicine & health ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,11171 Cardiocentro Ticino ,2705 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Interquartile range ,Internal medicine ,Occlusion ,medicine ,Humans ,Atrial Appendage ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cardiac Surgical Procedures ,Contraindication ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,Miniaturization ,business.industry ,Retrospective cohort study ,Femoral Vein ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Concomitant ,Cardiology ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,Implant ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Echocardiography, Transesophageal ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
This study assessed the clinical utility and feasibility of concomitant of combined left atrial appendage (LAA) closure and positioning of miniaturized pacemaker (Micra TPS). All consecutive patients who underwent VVI-PM implant from November 2015 to October 2016 were considered. VVI-PM implant was conducted either using transvenous approach or by positioning Micra TPS. In selected patients with concomitant contraindication to OAC, Micra TPS was combined with LAA occlusion ("combined approach"), performed in general anesthesia and guided by multimodality imaging; procedural and follow-up data of these specific patients were registered. Sixty patients were treated with VVI-PM implant. Six patients (10.0%) presented OAC contraindication, of which 4 (6.7%) were eligible for the "combined procedure"; 2 of 4 of these patients presented chronic hemodialysis-dependent renal failure. The combined approach was successful in all 4 patients without intra- or periprocedural complications. No adverse events linked to the combined approach occurred during mid-term follow-up (7.5, interquartile range 5.0 to 7.9 months). In conclusion, VVI-PM indication and concomitant contraindication to OAC is not uncommon; in selected patients, combined LAA closure and positioning of Micra TPS may be a feasible therapeutic option.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF