1. Usefulness of Screening Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Aortic Abnormalities After Repair of Coarctation of the Aorta
- Author
-
Curt J. Daniels, Bethany Boettner, Mira Trivedi, and Shane F. Tsai
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Coarctation of the aorta ,Aorta, Thoracic ,Aortic Coarctation ,Young Adult ,Aortic aneurysm ,Imaging, Three-Dimensional ,Postoperative Complications ,Aneurysm ,medicine.artery ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,cardiovascular diseases ,Child ,Retrospective Studies ,Aorta ,Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Vascular disease ,Reproducibility of Results ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,musculoskeletal system ,medicine.disease ,Descending aorta ,Circulatory system ,cardiovascular system ,Cardiology ,Female ,Radiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Vascular Surgical Procedures ,Magnetic Resonance Angiography ,Follow-Up Studies ,circulatory and respiratory physiology - Abstract
Guidelines recommend screening cardiovascular magnetic resonance (Sc-CMR) imaging for all patients after coarctation of the aorta repair, although there are limited data verifying its clinical utility. Therefore, we sought to assess the value of Sc-CMR in detecting aortic complications and at-risk abnormalities after coarctation of the aorta repair and to identify significant risk factors. We reviewed 76 patients (mean age 31 ± 10 years), including 40 with symptomatically indicated CMR (Sx-CMR) and 36 with Sc-CMR studies. CMR angiograms were evaluated for aortic abnormalities. Recoarctation was defined as residual narrowing/descending aorta at the diaphragm ≤0.5 (at risk ≤0.75), ascending aorta aneurysm as maximum ascending cross-sectional area/height ≥10 (at risk ≥5), and descending aorta aneurysm as maximum descending diameter/descending aorta at the diaphragm ≥1.5 (at risk ≥1.25). Aortic complications or abnormalities were found in 45 patients (59%). No patient met criteria for recoarctation (at risk 10 Sx-CMR vs 5 Sc-CMR). Significant risk factors included heart failure symptoms and female gender (p0.05). One patient (Sc-CMR) had ascending aneurysm (at risk 17 Sx-CMR vs 8 Sc-CMR). Time from repair was a significant predictor (p0.05). There were 10 patients (6 Sx-CMR vs 4 Sc-CMR) with descending aneurysm (at risk 8 Sx-CMR vs 7 Sc-CMR). Cardiovascular symptoms, hypertension, and echocardiogram were not predictive. In conclusion,50% of patients undergoing Sc-CMR had aortic abnormalities, which was not significantly different from those undergoing Sx-CMR. In particular, Sc-CMR identified descending aorta aneurysms that were not predicted by clinical parameters or echocardiogram.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF