Search

Advanced solid phase extraction (SPE) fibrous sorbents including polyethylene, polypropylene poly (hydroxybutyrate), and polyamide 6 nanofibers, polycaprolactone microfibers/nanofibers, polycaprolactone microfibers/polyvinylidene difluoride nanofibers, and poly (hydroxybutyrate) microfibers/polypropylene microfibers composites, as well as commercial molecularly imprinted polymers and restricted access media sorbent were compared in terms of bisphenols extraction from milk and their clean-up efficiency. Three on-line SPE-HPLC methods were completely validated for the extraction and detection of bisphenols A, AF, C, A diglycidyl ether, and F diglycidyl ether in bovine milk. Polycaprolactone composite nanofibers compared favorably to restricted access media, enabled excellent clean-up of bisphenols from the proteinaceous matrix, and yielded recoveries 98.0-124.5% and 93.0-115.0%, respectively, with RSD less than 10%. Total analysis time including on-line SPE step lasted only 12 min, which represents a significant reduction in time compared with previously reported as well as official European Union and AOAC methods defined for the determination of bisphenols in various matrices.

Effect of physicochemical properties including dissociation constant (pKa) and partition coefficient (log P) of the compounds on their extraction efficiency in sample preparation using fibrous polymer sorbents has been demonstrated. Poly-e-caprolactone as meltblown/electrospun composite fibers, and polypropylene, polyethylene, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), poly(lactic acid), and polyamide 6 in the meltblown fiber format were used as sorbents in solid-phase extraction. In addition, the polycaprolactone fibers were coated with dopamine, dopamine combined with heparin, and tannin, respectively, to modify their extraction properties. These fibers that were not yet used for extractions and the unique combination of sorbents and analytes significantly extends the scope of nanofibrous extraction. The extraction efficiency was determined using model pharmaceuticals including acetylsalicylic acid, moxonidine, metoprolol, propranolol, propafenone, diltiazem, atorvastatin, and amiodarone. These model compounds displayed the widest differences in both pKa and log P values. The extraction efficiency of some of the fibers reached 96.64%. Coating of polycaprolactone fibers with dopamine significantly improved extraction efficiency of slightly retained metoprolol while moxonidine was not retained on any sorbent. The fibrous sorbents were also tested for extraction of pharmaceuticals in bovine serum albumin and human serum, respectively, to demonstrate their capability to extract them from a complex protein-containing matrix. The clean-up efficiency of our fibers was compared with that of a commercial restricted access media (RAM) C-18 alkyl-diol silica column. Our technique is in accordance with the requirements of modern sample preparation techniques.

Nylon 6 nanofibers were tested for their ability to serve as a sorbent for solid phase extraction (SPE). The regular nanostructure providing a great sorption area and amidic functionality should lead to the assumption that nylon 6 nanofibers could be used as a novel sorbent with great potential for sample pre-treatment. However, due to the substantial differences between classical particle sorbents used for solid phase extraction and nanofibers, it is necessary to evaluate this novel approach. This article describes three types of laboratory fabricated nylon 6 nanofibers with different surface density (5.04gm-2, 3.90gm-2 and 0.75gm-2) and corresponding surface areas for solid phase extraction of several groups of compounds with different structural and physicochemical properties (parabens, steroids, flavonoids and pesticides). The nanofibers were created by needleless electrospinning. Extraction columns were manually packed in classic 1- or 3-mL plastic syringe cartridges with 26-30mg of nanofibers and the column bed was sealed with polypropylene frits. The SPE procedure followed a typical five-step protocol and the collected eluates were analyzed by HPLC with UV detection. Extraction recovery was used as a parameter to evaluate the behavior of the analytes within the SPE process. Under this set condition, the recovery of the SPE process ranged from 23.1% to 125.8%. SPE showed good repeatability (0.58-11.87% RSD) and inter-day reproducibility (3.86-9.79% RSD). The achieved results were compared with SPE using a classic particle sorbent column. Good mechanical and chemical stability of nanofibers was proved. Scanning electron microscope was used for the evaluation of morphological changes in nanostructure. Nylon 6 nanofibers proved being a cost-effective sorbent for repeated use in SPE. Nylon 6 nanofibers have great potential in miniaturized SPE enabling users to overcome troubles with high back-pressure.

On-line SPE HPLC method using nanofibrous sorbents for the extraction and determination of resveratrol in wine was developed and validated. Different types of nanofibrous and microfibrous polymers were tested and compared with commercial monolithic C18 sorbent. Polyamide and polyacrylonitrile nanofibers and composite materials composed of respective polycaprolactone and poly(vinylidene difluoride) nanofibers at microfibrous scaffold were included among tested materials. Two different polycaprolactone-based materials were prepared and their effect on the extraction properties studied. Alternatively, dopamine-coated polycaprolactone fibers were also used. Poly(vinylidene difluoride) nanofibers/polycaprolactone microfibers composite was found as the most effective sorbent and utilized for the method validation. Resveratrol in red wine was determined using our validated on-line SPE HPLC method.

Effective process, including a cartridge packing polypropylene fiber sorbent modified by following on-line polydopamine coating, for on-line solid phase extraction in 2D UHPLC system has been developed. Hydrophobic surface of mechanically stable polypropylene fibers was hydrophilized using an automated and reproducible in situ coating process to enable good wettability and effective extraction of polar compounds. Polymerization mixture consisting dopamine and TRIS buffer was circulated through the cartridge containing polypropylene fibers using a peristaltic pump to achieve polymerization. This process was optimized in terms of dopamine amount in the polymerization mixture, its flow rate, and polymerization time. Best results were obtained with 25 mL polymerization mixture containing 20 mg dopamine circulated through the cartridge at a flow rate of 2.07 mL min−1 for 60 min. Prepared cartridges were evaluated via measurement of the recovery and reproducibility using chlorogenic acid as a model compound. Overall reproducibility of our multistep process including eight cartridges in 2D UHPLC system, each measured in triplicate, was 3.61% (n = 24).

A novel application of the three-dimensional printing technology for the automation of solid phase extraction procedures in a low-pressure sequential injection analysis system is presented. A 3D printed device was used as a housing for nanofiber membranes in solid phase extraction. The applicability of the device is demonstrated with the extraction of substances of various physical-chemical properties. Pharmaceuticals including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antihistaminics, and steroidal structures, as well as emerging pollutants such as bisphenols and pesticide metsulfuron methyl were used as model analytes to study the extraction performance of the nanofibers. Six different nanofiber types comprising polyamide, polyethylene, polyvinylidene fluoride, polycaprolactone combined with polyvinylidene fluoride, and polyacrylonitrile, produced by electrospinning were tested in solid phase extraction. The suitability of specific nanofibers for particular analytes is demonstrated.

Polyamide 6 nanofiber polymers were used as modern sorbents for on-line solid phase extraction (SPE) coupled with liquid chromatography. The on-line SPE system was tested for the determination of bisphenol A in river water samples. Polyamide nanofibers were prepared using needleless electrospinning, inserted into a mini-column cartridge (5 × 4.6 mm) and coupled with HPLC. The effect of column packing and the amount of polyamide 6 on extraction efficiency was tested and the packing process was optimized. The proposed method was performed using a 50-µL sample injection followed by an on-line nanofibrous extraction procedure. The influence of the washing mobile phase on the retention of bisphenol A during the extraction procedure was evaluated. Ascentis® Express C18 (10 cm × 4.6 mm) core-shell column was used as an analytical column. Fluorescence detection wavelengths (λex = 225 nm and λem = 320 nm) were used for identification and quantification of Bisphenol A in river waters. The linearity was tested in the range from 2 to 500 µg L−1 (using nine calibration points). The limits of detection and quantification were 0.6 and 2 µg L−1, respectively. The developed method was successfully used for the determination of bisphenol A in various samples of river waters in the Czech Republic (The Ohře, Labe, Nisa, Upa, and Opava Rivers).