Search

The inverse Gaussian distribution is a two-parameter continuous probability distribution with positive support, which is used to account for the asymmetry of the positively skewed data that are often seen when modeling environmental phenomena, such as P M 2.5 levels. The coefficient of variation is often used to assess variability within datasets, and the common coefficient of variation of several independent samples can be used to draw inferences between them. Herein, we provide estimation methods for the confidence interval for the common coefficient of variation of multiple inverse Gaussian distributions by using the generalized confidence interval (GCI), the fiducial confidence interval (FCI), the adjusted method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER), and the Bayesian credible interval (BCI) and highest posterior density (HPD) methods using the Jeffreys prior rule. The estimation methods were evaluated based on their coverage probabilities and average lengths, using a Monte Carlo simulation study. The findings indicate the superiority of the GCI over the other methods for nearly all of the scenarios considered. This was confirmed for a real-world scenario involving P M 2.5 data from three provinces in northeastern Thailand that followed inverse Gaussian distributions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to slash/burn agricultural activity and frequent forest fires, P M 2.5 has become a significant air pollution problem in Thailand, especially in the north and north east regions. Since its dispersion differs both spatially and temporally, estimating P M 2.5 concentrations discretely by area, for which the inverse Gaussian distribution is suitable, can provide valuable information. Herein, we provide derivations of the simultaneous confidence interval for the ratios of the coefficients of variation of multiple inverse Gaussian distributions using the generalized confidence interval, the Bayesian interval based on the Jeffreys' rule prior, the fiducial interval, and the method of variance estimates recovery. The efficacies of these methods were compared by considering the coverage probability and average length obtained from simulation results of daily P M 2.5 datasets. The findings indicate that in most instances, the fiducial method with the highest posterior density demonstrated a superior performance. However, in certain scenarios, the Bayesian approach using the Jeffreys' rule prior for the highest posterior density yielded favorable results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Weibull distribution is a continuous probability distribution that finds wide application in various fields for analyzing real-world data. Specifically, wind speed data often adhere to the Weibull distribution. In our study, our aim is to compare the mean wind speed datasets from different areas in Thailand. To achieve this, we proposed simultaneous confidence intervals for all pairwise differences between the means of Weibull distributions. The generalized confidence interval (GCI), method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER), and a Bayesian approach, utilizing both gamma and uniform prior distributions, are proposed to construct simultaneous confidence intervals. Through simulations, we find that the Bayesian highest posterior density (HPD) interval using a gamma prior distribution demonstrates satisfactory performance, while the GCI proves to be a viable alternative. Finally, we applied these proposed approaches to real wind speed data in northeastern and southern Thailand to illustrate their effectiveness and practicality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The log-normal distribution (skewed distribution or asymmetry distribution) is used to describe random variables comprising positive real values. It is well known that the logarithm values of these are normally distributed (symmetry distribution). Positively right-skewed data applicable to the log-normal distribution are frequently observed in the fields of environmental studies, biology, and medicine. The number of zero observations follows a binomial distribution. However, problems can arise in the analysis of data containing zero observations along with log-normally distributed data, for which the delta-lognormal distribution is often referred to for using the analysis of the data. In statistics, the percentile provides the relative standing of a numerical data point when compared to all of the others in a distribution with reference to the observations at or below it. In this study, estimates for the confidence interval for the ratio of the percentiles of two delta-lognormal distributions are constructed using fiducial generalized confidence interval approaches based on the fiducial quantity and the optimal generalized fiducial quantity, the Bayesian approach, and the parametric bootstrap method. As assessed by Monte Carlo simulations using the RStudio programming in terms of the coverage probability and the average length, the Bayesian approach performed quite well by providing adequate coverage probabilities along with the shortest average lengths in all of the scenarios tested. Daily rainfall data contain both zero and positive values. The daily rainfall data can usually be fitted to the delta-lognormal distribution. Their application to rainfall data is also provided to illustrate their efficacies with real data. The efficacy of the approach is used to compare two rainfall dispersion populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, we propose estimates for the confidence interval for the common mean of several zero-inflated gamma (ZIG) distributions based on the fiducial generalized confidence interval (GCI) and Bayesian and highest posterior density (HPD) methods based on the Jeffreys rule or uniform prior. Their performances in terms of their coverage probabilities and expected lengths are compared via a Monte Carlo simulation study. For almost all of the scenarios considered, the simulation results show that the fiducial GCI performed better than the Bayesian and HPD methods. Daily rainfall data from Chiang Mai Province, Thailand that contains several zero entries and follows a ZIG distribution is used to test the efficacies of the methods in real-world situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Weibull distribution, one of the most significant distributions with applications in numerous fields, is associated with numerous distributions such as generalized gamma distribution, exponential distribution, and Rayleigh distribution, which are asymmetric. Nevertheless, it shares a close relationship with a normal distribution where a process of transformation allows them to become symmetric. The Weibull distribution is commonly used to study the failure of components and phenomena. It has been applied to a variety of scenarios, including failure time, claims amount, unemployment duration, survival time, and especially wind speed data. A suitable area for installing a wind turbine requires a wind speed that is both sufficiently high and consistent, and so comparing the variation in wind speed in two areas is eminently desirable. In this paper, methods to estimate the confidence interval for the ratio of the coefficients of variation of two Weibull distributions are proposed and applied to compare the variation in wind speed in two areas. The methods are the generalized confidence interval (GCI), the method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER), and Bayesian methods based on the gamma and uniform priors. The Bayesian methods comprise the equal-tailed confidence interval and the highest posterior density (HPD) interval. The effectiveness of the methods was evaluated in terms of their coverage probabilities and expected lengths and also empirically applied to wind speed datasets from two different areas in Thailand. The results indicate that the HPD interval based on the uniform prior outperformed the others in most of the scenarios tested and so it is suggested for estimating the confidence interval for the ratio of the coefficients of variation of two Weibull distributions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In situations where several positive random variables cannot be described using symmetrical distributions, a positively asymmetric distribution which has garnered much attention for studying them is the Birnbaum-Saunders (BS) distribution. This distribution was originally proposed to study fatigue over time in materials and has become widely employed for reliability and fatigue studies. In statistics, the coefficient of variation (CV) is employed to measure relative variation. Furthermore, comparing the CVs of several samples from BS distributions is an important approach to assess the variation among them. Herein, we propose estimation methods for the simultaneous confidence intervals (SCIs) for all pairwise differences between the CVs of multiple BS distributions based on the percentile bootstrap, the generalized confidence interval (GCI), the method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER) based on the asymptotic confidence interval (ACI) and GCI, Bayesian credible interval, and the highest posterior density (HPD) interval. The coverage probabilities and average lengths of the proposed methods were examined via a simulation study to determine their performance. The results demonstrate that GCI and the MOVER based on the GCI method provided satisfactory performances in almost every case studied. Particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μ m (PM2.5) concentration datasets from three areas in northern Thailand were used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution, also known as the fatigue life distribution, is right-skewed and used to model the failure times of industrial components. It has received much attention due to its attractive properties and its relationship to the normal distribution (which is symmetric). Furthermore, the coefficient of variation (CV) is commonly used to analyze variation within a dataset. In some situations, the independent samples are collected from different instruments or laboratories. Consequently, it is of importance to make inference for the common CV. To this end, confidence intervals based on the generalized confidence interval (GCI), method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER), large-sample (LS), Bayesian credible interval (BayCrI), and highest posterior density interval (HPDI) methods are proposed herein to estimate the common CV of several BS distributions. Their performances in terms of their coverage probabilities and average lengths were investigated by using Monte Carlo simulation. The simulation results indicate that the HPDI-based confidence interval outperformed the others in all of the investigated scenarios. Finally, the efficacies of the proposed confidence intervals are illustrated by applying them to real datasets of PM10 (particulate matter ≤ 10 μm) concentrations from three pollution monitoring stations in Chiang Mai, Thailand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fatigue in a material occurs when it is subjected to fluctuating stress and strain, which usually results in failure due to the accumulated damage. In statistics, asymmetric distribution, which is commonly used for describing the fatigue life of materials, is the Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution. This distribution can be transform to the normal distribution, which is symmetrical. Furthermore, variance is used to examine the dispersion of the fatigue life data. However, comparing the variances of two independent samples that follow BS distributions has not previously been reported. To accomplish this, we propose methods for providing the confidence interval for the ratio of variances of two independent BS distributions based on the generalized fiducial confidence interval (GFCI), a Bayesian credible interval (BCI), and the highest posterior density (HPD) intervals based on a prior distribution with partial information (HPD-PI) and a proper prior with known hyperparameters (HPD-KH). A Monte Carlo simulation study was carried out to examine the efficacies of the methods in terms of their coverage probabilities and average lengths. The simulation results indicate that the HPD-PI performed satisfactorily for all sample sizes investigated. To illustrate the efficacies of the proposed methods with real data, they were also applied to study the confidence interval for the ratio of the variances of two 6061-T6 aluminum coupon fatigue-life datasets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution, which is asymmetric with non-negative support, can be transformed to a normal distribution, which is symmetric. Therefore, the BS distribution is useful for describing data comprising values greater than zero. The coefficient of variation (CV), which is an important descriptive statistic for explaining variation within a dataset, has not previously been used for statistical inference on a BS distribution. The aim of this study is to present four methods for constructing confidence intervals for the CV, and the difference between the CVs of BS distributions. The proposed methods are based on the generalized confidence interval (GCI), a bootstrapped confidence interval (BCI), a Bayesian credible interval (BayCI), and the highest posterior density (HPD) interval. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate their performances in terms of coverage probability and average length. The results indicate that the HPD interval was the best-performing method overall. PM 2.5 concentration data for Chiang Mai, Thailand, collected in March and April 2019, were used to illustrate the efficacies of the proposed methods, the results of which were in good agreement with the simulation study findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]