Search

Background. Assessing the workload of surgeons requires technology to continuously monitor surgeons’ behaviors without interfering with their performance. We investigated the feasibility of using eye-tracking to reveal surgeons’ response to increasing task difficulty. Methods. A controlled study was conducted in a simulated operating room, where 14 subjects were required to perform a laparoscopic procedure that includes 9 subtasks. The subtasks could be divided into 3 types with different levels of task difficulty, calculated by the index of task difficulty (ID) proposed by Fitts in 1954. Pupillary responses of subjects in performing the procedure were recorded using Tobii eye-tracking equipment. Peak pupil dilation and movement time were compared between subtasks with different IDs as well as between fast moving and slow aiming phases within each subtask. Results. When the task difficulty was increased, task completion time increased. Meanwhile, the subjects’ peak pupil size also increased. As the entire procedure was performed continuously, we found that pupil responses were not only affected by the ID in the current subtask but also influenced by subtasks before and after. Discussion. Decomposing a surgical procedure into meaningful subtasks and examining the surgeon’s pupil response to each subtask enables us to identify the challenging steps within a continuous surgical procedure. Psychomotor evidence on surgeon’s performance may lead to an innovation for designing a task-specific training curriculum.

Recording eye motions in surgical environments is challenging. This study describes the authors’ experiences with performing eye-tracking for improving surgery training, both in the laboratory and in the operating room (OR). Three different eye-trackers were used, each with different capabilities and requirements. For monitoring eye gaze shifts over the room scene in a simulated OR, a head-mounted system was used. The number of surgeons’ eye glances on the monitor displaying patient vital signs was successfully captured by this system. The resolution of the head-mounted eye-tracker was not sufficient to obtain the gaze coordinates in detail on the surgical display monitor. The authors then selected a high-resolution eye-tracker built in to a 17-inch computer monitor that is capable of recording gaze differences with resolution of 1° of visual angle. This system enables one to investigate surgeons’ eye–hand coordination on the surgical monitor in the laboratory environment. However, the limited effective tracking distance restricts the use of this system in the dynamic environment in the real OR. Another eye-tracker system was found with equally high level of resolution but with more flexibility on the tracking distance, as the eye-tracker camera was detached from the monitor. With this system, the surgeon’s gaze during 11 laparoscopic procedures in the OR was recorded successfully. There were many logistical challenges with unobtrusively integrating the eye-tracking equipment into the regular OR workflow and data processing issues in the form of image compatibility and data validation. The experiences and solutions to these challenges are discussed.

Introduction. Trajectories of surgical instruments in laparoscopic surgery contain rich information about surgeons’ performance. In a simulation environment, instrument trajectories can be taken by motion sensors attached to the instruments. This method is not accepted by surgeons working in the operating room due to safety concerns. In this study, a novel approach of acquiring instrument trajectories from surgical videos is reported. Methods. A total of 12 surgical videos were obtained for this study. The videos were captured during simulated laparoscopic procedures where subjects were required to pick up and transport an object over 3 different targets using a laparoscopic grasper. An algorithm was developed to allow the computer to identify the tip of the grasper on each frame of video, and then compute the trajectories of grasper movement. Results. The newly developed algorithm successfully identified tool trajectories from all 12 surgical videos. To validate the accuracy of this algorithm, the location of the tooltip in these videos were also manually labeled. The rate of accurate matching between these 2 methods was 98.4% of all video frames. Discussion. Identifying tool movement from surgical videos creates an effective way to track instrument trajectories. This builds up the foundation for assessing psychomotor performance of surgeons in the operating room without jeopardizing patient safety.