1. An eye-tracking based robotic scrub nurse: proof of concept
- Author
-
Rudrik Thakkar, Alexandros Kogkas, Ara Darzi, Josephine Holt, Ahmed Ezzat, George P. Mylonas, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust- BRC Funding, and National Institute of Health Research
- Subjects
Robotic scrub nurse ,medicine.medical_specialty ,TEAMS ,Swine ,OPERATING-ROOM ,COMMUNICATION ,Assistive robotic devices ,Motion (physics) ,Task (project management) ,INTERRUPTIONS ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Robotic Surgical Procedures ,Task Performance and Analysis ,medicine ,Animals ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Eye-Tracking Technology ,Surgical team ,Science & Technology ,Gaze interactions ,business.industry ,1103 Clinical Sciences ,Robotics ,Gaze ,Smart operating room ,Test (assessment) ,New Technology ,Proof of concept ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Eye tracking ,Surgery ,Laparoscopy ,Metric (unit) ,Eye-tracking ,business ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Abstract
Background Within surgery, assistive robotic devices (ARD) have reported improved patient outcomes. ARD can offer the surgical team a “third hand” to perform wider tasks and more degrees of motion in comparison with conventional laparoscopy. We test an eye-tracking based robotic scrub nurse (RSN) in a simulated operating room based on a novel real-time framework for theatre-wide 3D gaze localization in a mobile fashion. Methods Surgeons performed segmental resection of pig colon and handsewn end-to-end anastomosis while wearing eye-tracking glasses (ETG) assisted by distributed RGB-D motion sensors. To select instruments, surgeons (ST) fixed their gaze on a screen, initiating the RSN to pick up and transfer the item. Comparison was made between the task with the assistance of a human scrub nurse (HSNt) versus the task with the assistance of robotic and human scrub nurse (R&HSNt). Task load (NASA-TLX), technology acceptance (Van der Laan’s), metric data on performance and team communication were measured. Results Overall, 10 ST participated. NASA-TLX feedback for ST on HSNt vs R&HSNt usage revealed no significant difference in mental, physical or temporal demands and no change in task performance. ST reported significantly higher frustration score with R&HSNt. Van der Laan’s scores showed positive usefulness and satisfaction scores in using the RSN. No significant difference in operating time was observed. Conclusions We report initial findings of our eye-tracking based RSN. This enables mobile, unrestricted hands-free human–robot interaction intra-operatively. Importantly, this platform is deemed non-inferior to HSNt and accepted by ST and HSN test users.
- Published
- 2021