Search

Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of routine preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (p-EGD) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Many medical problems that are common in patients with obesity, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernias, have important implications for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. While p-EGD is considered standard of care prior to antireflux surgery, the role of p-EGD in bariatric surgery patients remains controversial.We performed a retrospective chart review of 885 patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery at a university hospital-based bariatric surgery program between March 2011 and February 2022. Clinical history, demographics, and preoperative EGD reports were reviewed for abnormal findings.Of the 885 patients evaluated in this study, one or more abnormal EGD findings were observed in 83.2% of patients. More than half of our patients (54.7%) presented with history of heartburn, reflux, or GERD. EGD findings demonstrated a hernia in 43.1% of patients [(Type I: 40.6%; Type II: 0.5%; Type III: 2.1%)]. 68.0% of patients were biopsied. Among patients who were biopsied, other findings included gastritis (32.4%), esophagitis (8.0%), eosinophilic esophagitis (4.7%), or duodenitis (2.7%). We found ulcers in 6.7% of patients. Pathology was consistent with H. pylori in 9.8% of biopsies taken and consistent with BE in 2.7%. Following routine p-EGD, 11.2% of patients were placed on PPI and 8.3% were recommended to stop NSAIDs.Gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated pathology are common in the bariatric population. Preoperative EGD in patients undergoing bariatric surgery frequently identifies clinically significant UGI pathology. This may have important implications for medical and surgical management. Given the rate of abnormal preoperative endoscopic findings in obese patients, the work-up for bariatric surgery should align with the current recommendations for foregut surgery.

High rates of attrition to post-bariatric surgical care continue to be common, despite recommendations for lifelong follow-up. There is little available work focusing on the etiology of attrition to post-bariatric surgical follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are metrics of patients’ perceptions of their own health and have been used for their predictive value in other specialties. The relationships between PROs and loss to follow-up have not been explored. PRO data from patients who met the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) definition of loss to follow-up at 1-year postoperatively were reviewed and compared to patients who were compliant with 1-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) measures are routinely collected pre- and postoperatively at our institution using a series of validated computer-adaptive tests that assess depression, satisfaction with social roles, pain interference, and physical function. A series of univariate logistic regressions tested whether baseline PROs or change in PROs from baseline to 6-month postoperatively predicted loss to follow-up at 1 year. Neither baseline PROs nor change in depression, satisfaction with social roles, pain interference, or physical function were significant predictors of loss to follow-up. Similarly, patient state of residence, Charlson Comorbidity Index, BMI, and percent excess weight loss were not significant predictors of follow-up attrition. The PROs in this study were not significant predictors of loss to follow-up at 1-year postoperatively. The rate of bariatric procedures continues to increase nationally, so does the potential for late post-surgical complications. Given the potential impact of loss to follow-up on adverse late post-surgical outcomes, there is a need to facilitate long-term post-surgical follow-up and more investigation is needed to identify and intervene on underlying causes of bariatric patient follow-up attrition.

Currently, there is a relative paucity of literature regarding the management of symptomatic congenital diaphragmatic hernia of the foramen of Morgagni in the adult. This study aims to describe our unique surgical technique and outcomes in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of symptomatic Morgagni hernia. This is a retrospective review of adult patients from 2003 to 2020 who underwent a laparoscopic Morgagni hernia repair at our institution. All patients underwent a similar laparoscopic approach, utilizing the surgical principles of reduction of intra-abdominal contents, complete resection of the hernia sac, followed by primary repair of the hernia defect and mesh reinforcement with permanent mesh if the primary repair was subjectively under tension. The study population consisted of 12 consecutive patients with a Morgagni hernia. Patients presented with a variety of symptoms attributed to the hernia, including pain 83% (n = 10), respiratory symptoms and shortness of breath 58% (7), and gastrointestinal obstruction 25% (3). Other complaints included: nausea 33% (4), reflux 50% (6), early satiety 8% (1), palpitations 16% (2), a gurgling sensation in the chest 8% (1), and weight loss 8% (1). Primary repair was possible in all patients following complete reduction of hernia contents including the hernia sac. Mesh reinforcement was used in 5 of 12 patients. Average surgical operative time was 93 (± 37) min. Median length of stay was 1.3 days (range 0.5–5.5 days). At a median follow-up of 10.9 months (IQR 8.0–41.5 months), all symptoms attributed to the hernia had resolved. No recurrences were identified. Adults with symptomatic Morgagni hernia should undergo surgical repair. A laparoscopic approach utilizing the surgical principles of reduction of intra-abdominal contents, complete resection of the hernia sac, followed by primary repair of the hernia defect (when possible), with or without mesh reinforcement can be performed safely and effectively.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard operation for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with severe obesity, but there is variability in surgeon opinion regarding whether small type I hiatal hernias (HH) require routine repair concurrently with RYGB. We sought to examine whether leaving small type I HHs unrepaired during RYGB affected GERD outcomes.Pre-operatively our patients all receive endoscopy, and select patients with reflux symptoms receive esophagram based on attending surgeon practice and preference. We routinely repair paraesophageal hernias (PEH) concurrently with RYGB, but refrain from repairing small type I HH if, intra-operatively, the gastric fat pad and cardia are below the diaphragm with no evidence of retraction into the mediastinum. Records from 268 consecutive patients undergoing primary RYGB between January 2016 and February 2021 who completed pre-operative GERD-HRQL assessments were reviewed for presence of type I HH or PEH. Mann-Whitney U tests examined the pre-operative to post-operative change in GERD-HRQL in patients with type I HH left unrepaired at the time of RYGB (HH group) and patients with no hernia (NH group).Pre-operatively, GERD-HRQL scores were not statistically different between HH group (median = 7, mean = 8.5, n = 100) and NH group (median = 6.5, mean = 7.2, n = 141) (p 0.05). Post-operatively, there was no increase in GERD-HRQL scores patients whose hernias were left unrepaired. Neither group had clinically pathologic post-operative GERD-HRQL scores, with median 6 months scores of 1 for HH group (n = 68) versus 1.5 for NH group (n = 90) (p 0.05), and median 12 months scores of 1.5 for HH group (n = 40) versus 1 for NH group (n = 56) (p 0.05).Repair of small type I HH is not necessary to achieve effective, durable resolution of reflux symptoms with RYGB. Omitting repair reduces operative time, cost, and potential risk without adverse impact on post-operative reflux symptoms.

High rates of attrition to post-bariatric surgical care continue to be common, despite recommendations for lifelong follow-up. There is little available work focusing on the etiology of attrition to post-bariatric surgical follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are metrics of patients' perceptions of their own health and have been used for their predictive value in other specialties. The relationships between PROs and loss to follow-up have not been explored.PRO data from patients who met the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) definition of loss to follow-up at 1-year postoperatively were reviewed and compared to patients who were compliant with 1-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) measures are routinely collected pre- and postoperatively at our institution using a series of validated computer-adaptive tests that assess depression, satisfaction with social roles, pain interference, and physical function. A series of univariate logistic regressions tested whether baseline PROs or change in PROs from baseline to 6-month postoperatively predicted loss to follow-up at 1 year.Neither baseline PROs nor change in depression, satisfaction with social roles, pain interference, or physical function were significant predictors of loss to follow-up. Similarly, patient state of residence, Charlson Comorbidity Index, BMI, and percent excess weight loss were not significant predictors of follow-up attrition.The PROs in this study were not significant predictors of loss to follow-up at 1-year postoperatively. The rate of bariatric procedures continues to increase nationally, so does the potential for late post-surgical complications. Given the potential impact of loss to follow-up on adverse late post-surgical outcomes, there is a need to facilitate long-term post-surgical follow-up and more investigation is needed to identify and intervene on underlying causes of bariatric patient follow-up attrition.

Currently, there is a relative paucity of literature regarding the management of symptomatic congenital diaphragmatic hernia of the foramen of Morgagni in the adult. This study aims to describe our unique surgical technique and outcomes in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of symptomatic Morgagni hernia.This is a retrospective review of adult patients from 2003 to 2020 who underwent a laparoscopic Morgagni hernia repair at our institution. All patients underwent a similar laparoscopic approach, utilizing the surgical principles of reduction of intra-abdominal contents, complete resection of the hernia sac, followed by primary repair of the hernia defect and mesh reinforcement with permanent mesh if the primary repair was subjectively under tension.The study population consisted of 12 consecutive patients with a Morgagni hernia. Patients presented with a variety of symptoms attributed to the hernia, including pain 83% (n = 10), respiratory symptoms and shortness of breath 58% (7), and gastrointestinal obstruction 25% (3). Other complaints included: nausea 33% (4), reflux 50% (6), early satiety 8% (1), palpitations 16% (2), a gurgling sensation in the chest 8% (1), and weight loss 8% (1). Primary repair was possible in all patients following complete reduction of hernia contents including the hernia sac. Mesh reinforcement was used in 5 of 12 patients. Average surgical operative time was 93 (± 37) min. Median length of stay was 1.3 days (range 0.5-5.5 days). At a median follow-up of 10.9 months (IQR 8.0-41.5 months), all symptoms attributed to the hernia had resolved. No recurrences were identified.Adults with symptomatic Morgagni hernia should undergo surgical repair. A laparoscopic approach utilizing the surgical principles of reduction of intra-abdominal contents, complete resection of the hernia sac, followed by primary repair of the hernia defect (when possible), with or without mesh reinforcement can be performed safely and effectively.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects two thirds of the American population. Obesity is also a disease that affects two thirds of the population. The pathophysiology of reflux disease is reasonably understood, however, the degree to which obesity affects this disease remains poorly defined. Therefore the approach to GERD in the obese patient requires special attention and its own algorithm. A literature search was conducted to consolidate the current available literature on GERD and its management in the obese. In addition, the authors reviewed the literature and present expert opinion on controversial topics. It is well established that GERD is increased in obesity and the pathophysiology is reviewed. Management options for GERD are discussed, with a focus on the obese population. Management strategies including fundoplication and gastric bypass are discussed. In addition, bariatric surgery in the setting of GERD is also reviewed. Currently this is an extremely controversial topic and this white paper presents a strong review of the literature to help guide the management of this challenging disease in this population. Expert recommendations are given throughout the paper based upon the current available data.

Acute incarceration of paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) requiring urgent or emergent surgery is rare. Patients are often elderly with significant comorbidities and have historically been treated with open abdominal or thoracic incisions. Our study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) in patients with PEH and acute gastric volvulus. We reviewed our prospectively maintained database and identified 269 patients who underwent an initial LPEHR between January 2003 and January 2012. Patients were divided into group A (acute), group B (age- and comorbidity-matched 1:3), and group C (all elective repairs). Group A included those admitted with acute symptoms related to PEH and underwent urgent repair. Patient age, Charlson score, operative time, length of stay (LOS), morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates were compared. Patients who underwent urgent LPEHR had a higher perioperative morbidity rate than the elective and matched groups. The overall mortality rate was low and no statistical difference was found between groups A, B, and C. LOS in group A was longer than groups B and C. The need for ICU admission was also higher in group A. There was no statistical difference in recurrence rates. Historically, patients presenting with acute symptoms related to PEH have required open repair, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The acute group was older and sicker than our elective LPEHR patients and had more adverse events resulting in a longer LOS, even when compared with comorbidity-matched elective patients. However, the LOS remained shorter than that reported for open repair and there was no mortality. The recurrence rates in all groups were low and comparable to elective repairs.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common comorbid condition in morbidly obese gastric bypass candidates. Unfortunately, some patients who ultimately present for bariatric surgery have previously undergone Nissen fundoplication for GERD. Many surgeons consider previous fundoplication to be a relative contraindication to subsequent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) due to increased technical complexity and risk. We sought to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of a cohort of patients who had first undergone fundoplication and ultimately chose to later pursue LRYGB for morbid obesity (revision) to matched control patients. Data were obtained from our prospectively maintained bariatric surgery database. Patients who underwent laparoscopic takedown of a previous fundoplication and conversion to LRYGB were compared to control patients who underwent primary LRYGB. For every revision patient, two control subjects were randomly selected from the database after matching for preoperative body mass index and year of surgery. From July 2002 to April 2011, 14 patients underwent laparoscopic takedown of a previous Nissen fundoplication and then underwent LRYGB. During the same interval, 673 patients underwent LRYGB as a primary procedure for obesity from which 28 were selected as controls. There were no conversions to open laparotomy in any patient. Subjects were similar demographically. Operating time and duration of hospital stay were significantly longer in revision patients. Complications were more frequent in revisions (36% revisions vs. 7% controls, P = 0.03). Excess weight loss 1-year after surgery was excellent in both groups and did not differ (69% revision vs. 69.6% controls, P = 0.93). Although associated with longer operating times, longer duration of hospital stay, and complications, LRYGB after fundoplication is feasible and safe. Long-term weight loss outcomes are similar to those seen following primary LRYGB. Previous fundoplication is not a contraindication to LRYGB.