Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare different methods of evaluating the version of a metallic acetabular cup from plain radiographs and to compare them regarding their accuracy, inter- and intra-observer reliability. Methods: Conventional anterior-posterior radiographs were taken of a phantom-model at different defined ante- and retroversion angles of the acetabular cup. The version angles of the acetabular cup were derived according to four different established methods from the radiographs by five independent examiners. Results: We were able to determine the radiographic version with the greatest accuracy according to a modified technique of Pettersson et al. Furthermore, we found the highest intra- and inter-observer reliability using this technique. Conclusions: A modified technique of Pettersson et al. broadens the spectrum of applicability for the radiographic evaluation of the version angle of metal-backed acetabular cups in comparison to the originally introduced method. In clinical practice, however, the significance of deriving the cup position from standard radiographs should not be over-estimated and therefore a computed tomography should be performed in certain critical cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty (THA) regarding its inclination and version angles are influential parameters concerning the postoperative range of motion and dislocation stability. Standard anterior-posterior X-rays remain an important diagnostic instrument to observe the postoperative outcome and to secure quality control after THA, where an optimal positioning of the patient is recommended when taking these X-rays. The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine the effect of pelvic tilting regarding the positioning calculation of the acetabular cup from standard radiographs using a modified method according to Pettersson et al. (Acta Radiol Diagn, 23:259–263, ). In our model experiment, we were able to show that pelvic tilting to either side causes a considerable difference between the radiographic and calculated version angles following approximately linear functions. However, pelvic tilting to either side, leads, regarding the calculation of the inclination, to an average deviation between radiographic and calculated inclination angles less than 2°. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]