Search

Background Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is known, in general, to improve renal function in patients with obesity and chronic kidney disease (CKD), its effect on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stratified by the stage of CKD is less clear. Objectives We aimed to evaluate the impact of sleeve gastrectomy on renal function in a stratified cohort of patients with CKD. Setting University Hospital. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 1932 patients who met National Institutes of Health’s guidelines for metabolic surgery and underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed by 1 of 3 surgeons. One hundred sixty-four patients with CKD stages 1 through 4 were identified. Results Mean follow-up period was 1.57 ± 1.0 years. Mean age was 56.4 ± 9.9 years with a preoperative body mass index of 47 ± 9 kg/m2, which decreased to 38.9 ± 8.7 kg/m2 at most recent follow-up (P Conclusion Renal function, as measured by eGFR, in patients with stages 1 and 4 CKD did not improve after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; in contrast, eGFR in patients with CKD stages 2 and 3 significantly improved. Early surgical referral and intervention may be important in achieving the greatest improvement in eGFR and possibly delaying or reversing progression to end-stage renal disease.

Morbid obesity serves as a barrier to kidney transplantation (KT) due to potential suboptimal posttransplant outcomes. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has previously been shown to improve transplant eligibility through weight loss.We aimed to examine the role LSG plays in improving patient outcomes postrenal transplantation, including possible impact on new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT).University Hospital.A single-center analysis was performed identifying all patients who underwent KT after LSG from 2011 to 2017 (n = 41). Exclusion criteria included type I diabetes and previous pancreas transplantation. NODAT was defined as a new insulin requirement after KT. Delayed graft function was defined as need for dialysis within the first week after KT. Mean posttransplant follow-up period was 22 months.Forty-one patients underwent KT after LSG after median time of 16 months. Median age of postLSG patients undergoing KT was 56.0 years at time of KT. Average body mass index decreased by 9 from the time of LSG to KT, and no patients regained weight at 1-year follow-up. After LSG, the number of patients with hypertension (85.4% versus 48.5%) and the number of antihypertensive medications used decreased significantly (1.6 versus .6) at time of KT (P.001 each). At 1-year follow-up, the improvement in hypertension persisted (51.2% versus 48.5%, P = nonsignificant). The average insulin regimen decreased from 33.0 ± 51.6 to 11.7 ± 21.5 units at KT (P.001). This improvement also persisted at 1-year follow-up (11.9 versus 11.7 units, P = nonsignificant). Zero patients suffered NODAT over the follow-up period (versus institutional rate of NODAT at 15.8%). One patient developed delayed graft function (2.4%, versus institutional rate of 13.3%). After 1 year postKT, there was 1 graft loss (2.4%) and no mortality.This is the largest reported series of KT after planned LSG in morbidly obese patients. Our results confirm excellent posttransplant outcomes among patients who otherwise would have been denied KT eligibility.