Search

Background: Surgical techniques for adrenalectomy have evolved substantially over the last century. Although minimally invasive approaches are favored for benign disease, open adrenalectomy remains the gold standard for large tumors and those concerning for malignancy. Most reports describe the use of midline, subcostal, or thoracoabdominal incisions for open adrenalectomy. We studied our experience with the Makuuchi incision, designed to optimize exposure and minimize denervation of the abdominal wall., Methods: All open adrenalectomies at the University of Rochester from 2009 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographic characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative complications were investigated. Surgical site infection and hernia rates of Makuuchi incision were compared with non-Makuuchi incision patients and with published standards. The study was approved by the university Institutional Review Board., Results: A total of 41 adrenalectomies were performed via Makuuchi incision. Population statistics included a mean age of 51.7 (19-86) years, a mean body mass index of 29.7 (17.3-45.8), and a mean tumor diameter of 8 cm (3.1-26 cm). Fourteen (34%) required multivisceral resection. Twenty-one (51%) were previous or current smokers, and 9 (22%) had hypercortisolemia. Median duration of stay was 6 days (4-73). Incisional hernia occurred in 5 patients (12%) and surgical site infection in 3 patients (7%), 2 patients had Cushing syndrome and 1 was immunosuppressed. Pain was managed with patient-controlled epidural anesthesia or patient-controlled anesthesia with postoperative day 1 daily morphine equivalents equating to 0.5 mg of hydromorphone q2h. Among 15 non-Makuuchi incision patients, there were 2 hernias (13%), 2 surgical site infections (13%), and 1 case of postoperative pneumonia., Conclusion: The Makuuchi incision is well tolerated and affords outstanding exposure of the adrenals and adjacent viscera. Incisional hernia and surgical site infection rates were favorable compared with published rates for midline or subcostal incisions, despite an obese population with a high incidence of hypercortisolism and immunosuppression., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Colostomy reversal after Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis is a morbid procedure, and studies investigating factors associated with outcomes are lacking. This study identifies patient, surgeon, and hospital-level factors associated with perioperative outcomes after stoma reversal., Methods: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was queried for urgent/emergency Hartmann's procedures for diverticulitis between 2000-2012 in New York State and subsequent colostomy reversal within 1 year of the procedure. Surgeon and hospital volume were categorized into tertiles based on the annual number of colorectal resections performed each year. Bivariate and mixed-effects analyses were used to assess the association between patient, surgeon, and hospital-level factors and perioperative outcomes after colostomy reversal, including a laparoscopic approach; duration of stay; intensive care unit admission; complications; mortality; and 30-day, unscheduled readmission., Results: Among 10,487 patients who underwent Hartmann's procedure and survived to discharge, 63% had the colostomy reversed within 1 year. After controlling for patient, surgeon, and hospital-level factors, high-volume surgeons (≥40 colorectal resections/yr) were independently associated with higher odds of a laparoscopic approach (unadjusted rates: 14% vs 7.6%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = 1.12, 3.00), shorter duration of stay (median: 6 versus 7 days; adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval = 0.81, 0.95), and lower odds of 90-day mortality (unadjusted rates: 0.4% vs 1.0%; adjusted odds ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval = 0.10, 0.88) compared with low-volume surgeons (1-15 colorectal resections/yr)., Conclusion: High-volume surgeons are associated with better perioperative outcomes and lower health care utilization after Hartmann's reversal for diverticulitis. These findings support referral to high-volume surgeons for colostomy reversal., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Centralization of care to "centers of excellence" in Europe has led to improved oncologic outcomes; however, little is known regarding the impact of nonmandated regionalization of rectal cancer care in the United States., Methods: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) was queried for elective abdominoperineal and low anterior resections for rectal cancer from 2000 to 2011 in New York with the use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Surgeon volume and hospital volume were grouped into quartiles, and high-volume surgeons (≥ 10 resections/year) and hospitals (≥ 25 resections/year) were defined as the top quartile of annual caseload of rectal cancer resection and compared with the bottom 3 quartiles during analyses. Bivariate and multilevel regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with restorative procedures, 30-day mortality, and temporal trends in these endpoints., Results: Among 7,798 rectal cancer resections, the overall rate of no-restorative proctectomy and 30-day mortality decreased by 7.7% and 1.2%, respectively, from 2000 to 2011. In addition, there was a linear increase in the proportion of cases performed by both high-volume surgeons and high-volume hospitals and a decrease in the number of surgeons and hospitals performing rectal cancer surgery. High-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals were associated independently with both less nonrestorative proctectomies (odds ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.89) and mortality (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.87) rates. No patterns of significant improvement within the volume strata of the surgeon and hospitals were observed over time., Conclusion: This study suggests that the current trend toward regionalization of rectal cancer care to high-volume surgeons and high-volume centers has led to improved outcomes. These findings have implications regarding the policy of health care delivery in the United States, supporting referral to high-volume centers of excellence., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is currently little information regarding the impact of procedure volume on outcomes after open inguinal hernia repair in the United States. Our hypothesis was that increasing procedure volume is associated with lesser rates of reoperation and resource use., Methods: The database of the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was queried for elective open initial inguinal hernia repairs performed in New York State from 2001 to 2008 via the use of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Surgeon and hospital procedure volumes were grouped into tertiles based on the number of open inguinal hernia repairs performed per year. Bivariate, hierarchical mixed effects Cox proportional-hazards, and negative binomial regression analyses were performed assessing for factors associated with reoperation for recurrence, procedure time, and downstream total charges., Results: Among 151,322 patients who underwent open inguinal hernia repair, the overall rate of reoperation for recurrence within 5 years was 1.7% with a median time to reoperation of 1.9 years. An inverse relationship was seen between surgeon volume and reoperation rate, procedure time, and health care costs (P < .001). After we controlled for surgeon, facility, operative and patient characteristics, low-volume surgeons (<25 repairs/year) had greater rates of reoperation (hazard ratio 1.23,95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.11-1.36), longer procedure times (incidence rate ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.21-1.24), and greater downstream costs (incidence rate ratio 1.13,95% CI 1.10-1.17) than high-volume surgeons (≥25 repairs/year)., Conclusion: Surgeon volume <25 cases per year for open inguinal hernia repair was independently associated with greater rates of reoperation for recurrence, worse operative efficiency, and greater health care costs. Referral to surgeons who perform ≥25 inguinal hernia repairs per year should be considered to decrease reoperation rates and resource use., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: There is strong evidence supporting the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pathologic, stage III colon cancer. This study examines differences in adherence to evidence-based adjuvant chemotherapy guidelines for pathologic, stage III colon cancer cases across hospital and patient subgroups., Methods: Patients with stage III colon cancer were identified from the 2003 to 2011 National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). A logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy across varying hospital and patient characteristics. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and 5-year survival. Risk adjusted observed/expected (O/E) outcome ratios were calculated for each hospital to compare hospital-specific quality of care during the study period., Results: A total of 124,008 patients met the inclusion criteria. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not administered to 34%. The rates of adjuvant chemotherapy have shown little improvement over time (63% in 2003 vs 66% in 2011). The Cox model indicates that patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had better survival (hazard ratio = 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.49). Analysis of risk adjusted O/E ratios indicated no consistent pattern as to which hospitals were performing optimally or subopitmally over time., Conclusion: There has been no meaningful improvement in receipt of chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer. The fact that chemotherapy is not being considered or offered to more than 20% of patients with node-positive colon cancer suggests that there are substantial process failures across many institutions and regions in the United States., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)