Search

Background: There is little objective data to support the conventional wisdom of waiting 4 to 6 weeks after stroke to improve surgical outcome of subsequent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We have aggressively pursued CEA in patients after recent stroke; in this study we report our results., Methods: We performed 215 CEA procedures in 200 patients who presented with an indication of stroke within 6 months of CEA. Cervical block anesthesia was used 193 cases. The rest were performed with the patient under general anesthesia., Results: Perioperative stroke rate was 1.4% (3/215), and operative mortality was 2% (4/200) (stroke mortality = 3.4%). There were four early occlusions. Shunts were used in 13.9%, patch closure in 8.4%, and eversion endarterectomy in 48% of cases. There was no correlation between timing of surgery, extent of infarct on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, and postoperative neurologic complications with the occurrence of postoperative stroke (p = NS). During the same period, 1,922 patients underwent CEA for indications other than stroke, with a perioperative stroke rate and mortality rate of 1.1%., Conclusions: Selected patients presenting with a history of stroke and significant carotid artery disease can safely undergo early CEA with a mortality and morbidity comparable to patients undergoing CEA for other indications.

Background: Preservation of neurological function with a low incidence of restenosis is a measure of the long-term durability of carotid endarterectomy. Routine and selective patch angioplasty of the internal carotid artery have both been used to reduce the incidence of restenosis. The European literature has had many reports of lower restenosis rates in patients undergoing eversion carotid endarterectomy. We evaluated our experience with the eversion carotid endarterectomy procedure over a 2-year period to identify any advantage of this technique., Methods: Between August 1993 and August 1995, 376 patients underwent 449 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) using the eversion technique (described below). During the same period, 307 patients underwent 353 CEAs by standard endarterectomy. Demographics were similar in both groups. Fifty-two patients in the eversion group underwent combined open cardiac procedures and carotid endarterectomy. There were 47 such patients in the standard group. Duplex examination was performed after surgery at regular intervals to identify any recurrent stenosis., Results: Operative mortality was 4 of 376 (1.1%) and 6 of 307 (2%) in the eversion and standard groups, respectively. Shunts were used in 15 of 449 patients in the eversion group and 24 of 353 patients in the standard group. Cervical block anesthesia was used in 669 of 687 (97%) of patients undergoing CEA without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There were four permanent neurologic deficits in the eversion group and seven in the standard group, for respective stroke rates of 0.9% and 2%, and there were three transient neurologic deficits in the eversion group and nine in the standard group. There was one (0.2%) restenosis in the eversion group; there were four (1.1%) in the standard group by follow-up duplex scan., Conclusions: These data demonstrate that eversion carotid endarterectomy can be performed with low stroke and mortality rates in the treatment of extracranial carotid occlusive disease. The incidence of restenosis was lower and approached significance in eversion endarterectomy when compared to standard carotid endarterectomy in the short-term follow-up in this series.

Background: Arterial reconstructions performed for limb salvage have increasingly used distal perimalleolar and pedal arteries as outflow tracts. However, a paucity of reports comparing the patency and limb salvage rates of these outflow tracts has been published. In this report we examine our experience with distal peroneal artery reconstructions for limb salvage., Methods: During the past 14 years 159 bypasses were performed to the distal peroneal artery (within 5 cm of the malleolus), 157 of which were performed by the medial approach and two by the lateral approach., Results: Sixty-three percent of the patients were male, 65% were diabetics, and 43% were smokers; the average age was 72.6 years. Sixty-five percent of the bypasses were performed with the in situ technique. Thirty-one percent of the bypasses were performed with translocated or spliced vein technique, and seven (4%) were performed with prosthetic technique. Secondary patency rates for distal peroneal artery bypass grafts at 1 and 5 years were 86% and 75%. The limb salvage rate for distal peroneal artery bypasses was 87% at 5 years. Four hemodynamic failures occurred in this group. Wound complications requiring revision were seen in one patient with a distal peroneal bypass (0.6%). These results do not differ from our results with other perimalleolar vessels., Conclusions: Arterial reconstruction to the distal peroneal artery has acceptable patency and limb salvage rates. These bypasses are as effective and durable as other perimalleolar bypasses.

Limb salvage in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is complicated by the diffuse, obstructive, calcific arteriopathy that makes anastomotic technique especially critical. Furthermore, decreased resistance to infection and impaired wound healing produced by host-factor deficiencies such as diabetes mellitus, hypoalbuminemia, uremia, and immunosuppression produce additional obstacles to successful limb salvage. This report summarizes our experience with distal arterial bypass procedures in these patients. A total of 32 bypass procedures were performed for limb salvage in 24 patients (17 diabetic) during a period of 5 years. The operative mortality rate was 6%. During the same period, 635 infrainguinal bypass procedures were performed by the in situ technique in patients without ESRD. Primary bypass patency was comparable in both groups at 24 months (92% vs 90%). In the group with ESRD, overall limb salvage was 83% at 2 years. Life-table analysis of bypass patency and limb salvage was thought not to be appropriate in the population with ESRD beyond 2 years because of the increased mortality rate (38%; 9/24) during this interval. It is important that limb salvage was achieved in diabetic patients with ESRD in the presence of extensive foot gangrene or ischemic ulceration. Revascularization should be considered strongly for limb salvage in all patients in this difficult population.