Search

Background: Approximately 300 cases of leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava (IVC) have been reported in the literature to date. In this study, we combined the experience from 2 institutions to provide additional clinical outcomes data. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis from 1984 to 2009 that included 17 patients treated between the 2 institutions. Clinicopathologic data, surgical and adjuvant therapy, and survival outcomes were obtained. Results: The median age of patients in the study was 48 years. The tumor location was infrarenal in 8 patients, juxtarenal in 6, and suprahepatic in 2 patients; 7 patients had high-grade tumors. All patients underwent complete resection; the IVC was repaired primarily in 5 patients, ligated in 5, and reconstructed with a prosthetic tube graft in 7 patients. There was no perioperative mortality; 6 patients had complications. Median follow-up was 49 months; median survival had not been reached when this paper was written. The 5-year overall and disease -free survival were 56% and 37%, respectively. Of the 17 patients, 10 experienced disease recurrence and underwent numerous treatment modalities for these recurrences. Conclusion: Aggressive resection of primary leiomyosarcoma of the IVC can be performed safely and result in long-term survival, irrespective of IVC management. Despite high recurrence rates, no consensus yet exists regarding adjuvant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Health care systems provide care to increasingly complex and elderly patients. Colorectal surgery is a prime example, with high volumes of major procedures, significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and unplanned readmissions. This situation is exacerbated by an exponential rise in costs that threatens the stability of health care systems. Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) have been proposed as a means to reduce morbidity and improve effectiveness of care. We have reviewed the evidence supporting the implementation of ERP in clinical practice. Methods: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for randomized, controlled trials comparing ERP with traditional care in colorectal surgery. Systematic reviews and papers on ERP based on data published in major surgical and anesthesiology journals were critically reviewed by international contributors, experienced in the development and implementation of ERP. Results: A random-effect Bayesian meta-analysis was performed, including 6 randomized, controlled trials totalizing 452 patients. For patients adhering to ERP, length of stay decreased by 2.5 days (95% credible interval [CrI] −3.92 to −1.11), whereas 30-day morbidity was halved (relative risk, 0.52; 95% CrI, 0.36–0.73) and readmission was not increased (relative risk, 0.59; 95% CrI, 0.14–1.43) when compared with patients undergoing traditional care. Conclusion: Adherence to ERP achieves a reproducible improvement in the quality of care by enabling standardization of health care processes. Thus, while accelerating recovery and safely reducing hospital stay, ERPs optimize utilization of health care resources. ERPs can and should be routinely used in care after colorectal and other major gastrointestinal procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Minimally invasive liver surgery is a rapidly advancing field with demonstrated applicability to living donation. In this paper, we compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted donor right hepatectomy (LADRH) to open donor right hepatectomy (ODRH). Methods: We performed a retrospective, comparative analysis of 33 LADRH to the most recent 33 ODRH performed at our institution, evaluating donor complications, costs, and recipient outcomes. Results: Donor demographics including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and vascular and biliary anomalies were comparable. Donor complication rates were equivalent for LADRH and ODRH. Donor operative times were shorter for LADRH (LADRH 265 minutes, ODRH 316; P < .001) even after adjusting for BMI. Blood loss and length of stay were comparable. Additionally, total hospitalization costs were equivalent (LADRH $1.11, ODRH $1.00; P = .19). Higher operative supply costs for LADRH were balanced by higher time-based operative costs for ODRH resulting in no significant differences in total operative costs. Finally, there were no differences in graft size, recipient patient or graft survival, or recipient vascular or biliary complications. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that LADRH compares favorably with ODRH with equivalent safety, resource utilization, and effectiveness. We believe that LADRH provides potential physical and psychological benefits without an adverse effect on outcomes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Since Allen O. Whipple published his seminal paper in 1935, the procedure that bears his name has been performed widely throughout the world and is now a common operation in major medical centers. The goal of this study was to investigate the evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Methods: We sought to identify all pancreatoduodenectomies performed at the MGH since 1935. Cases were obtained from a computerized database, hospital medical records, and the MGH historical archive. Demographics, diagnosis, intraoperative variables and short-term surgical outcomes were recorded. Results: The first pancreatoduodenectomy at the MGH was carried out in 1941; since then, 2,050 Whipple procedures have been performed. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was the most frequent indication (36%). Pylorus preservation has been the most important variation in technique, accounting for 45% of Whipple procedures in the 1980s; observation of frequent delayed gastric emptying after this procedure led to decline in its use. Pancreatic fistula was the most frequent complication (13%). Operative blood replacement and reoperation rates have decreased markedly over time; the most frequent indication for reoperation was intra-abdominal bleeding. Mortality has decreased from 45% to 0.8%, with sepsis and hypovolemic shock being the most frequent causes of death. Mean duration of hospital stay has decreased from >30 to 9.5 days, along with an increasing readmission rate (currently 19%). Conclusion: The Whipple procedure in the 21st century is a well-established operation. Improvements in operative technique and perioperative care have contributed in making it a safe operation that continues evolving. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]