Search

Purpose: This study aims to determine the financial toxicity (FT) level in cancer patients, identify the risk factors associated with this level, and reveal the effect of this level on patient outcomes (health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment non-adherence). Methods: The data of 316 cancer patients, who were receiving inpatient treatment in an oncology hospital affiliated to a public university in Ankara, Turkey, were ≥ 18 years old, and were receiving chemotherapy for at least 3 months, were evaluated. The data were collected through a face-to-face interview. FT was measured with the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) Measure (v2), HRQoL was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Scale (v4), and treatment adherence was measured using a questionnaire created by conducting a literature review. Results: Patients were found to experience FT above the moderate level (mean ± SD, 21.85 ± 12.02; median value, 24.0). Younger age, being married, low education level, low monthly household income, and receiving social/economic support for treatment were revealed to be the determinants of high FT. Moreover, as the FT score decreased (as the FT level felt increased), the HRQoL was observed to decrease, and treatment non-adherence increased. Conclusion: The results indicate that FT problem is also valid for cancer patients in Turkey despite the system of general health insurance. The FT was found to result from socio-economic characteristics rather than the disease and treatment-related characteristics. The significant associations revealed between FT and patient outcomes emphasize the importance of reducing the FT in cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify a cut-off score for the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) to predict a clinical implication of a high level of financial toxicity (FT). Methods: A total of 640 cancer patients were recruited from three regional hospitals in Hong Kong. They completed a questionnaire comprising the COST measure and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) instrument. The cut-off score for the COST that predicts the lowest quartile of the FACT-G total score was identified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The sample was then stratified by this cut-off score, and characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact, chi-squared or independent sample t-test. Results: The mean scores were 20.1 ± 8.8 for the COST and 71.6 ± 15.5 for the FACT-G. The ROC analysis suggested that the cut-off of 17.5 yielded an acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Characteristics of patients with a higher level of FT included being younger, having a monthly household income of < 10,000 HKD (approximately 1290 USD), being more likely not employed, having stage IV cancer and receiving targeted and/or immunotherapy. In terms of financial support, a higher proportion of these patients had discussed financial issues with health care professionals and had received financial assistance. In addition, fewer of them were covered by private health insurance. Conclusion: Our findings suggest a cut-off for the COST that can be used to screen for FT in clinical settings. In addition, while a considerable proportion of high-FT patients received targeted therapy, they often received financial assistance. There is a gap between financial hardship and assistance that warrants attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]